Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

News Credits: 33 · by **Genocide G2.0** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:39 am

Classic? MP? .

These look excellent if these are classics that's another hasbro figure pushed out hasbro scourge is a bit stumpy for my taste.

News Credits: 461 · by **mooncake623** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:45 am

wow... looks nice. not sure why that Gatling gun is needed. never seen him use that before.

News Credits: 402 · by **Mkall** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 8:26 am

I don't see the need to replace my Scourge/Sweep Armada with these guys

by **Rated X** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 8:51 am

I need to see the alt mode first. This looks very much like a shell former. But seeing as were finally getting a better Galvatron, why not ? Bring on a Cyclonus too with a better alt mode. Less Hasbro in my opinion is a good thing. Screw the damn flying wing, the kids can have it.

News Credits: 14 · by **robotmel** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:09 am

Ah, is this the same resin kit/custom that was offered by Eagle a couple of years back?
If so, the 'original' kit is still available via ToyModa.com!
http://www.toymoda.com/goods.php?id=296

I cant view the pics Autobot Genecide posted earlier as Im at work and it blanks the pictures out depending on where they are being hosted from!

News Credits: 1 · by **rpetras** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:33 pm

It is not the Toymoda kit.

I like them, but would I replace my Titanium scourge & sweeps ... maybe. :-?

Website · by **RK_Striker_JK_5** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:16 pm

Well, this is pretty useless.

by **Yotsuyasan** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:48 pm

I am more then happy with my Classics Scourge & Sweeps, and cannot help but wonder once again at a third party that is redoing a character who has already been done well enough, rather then tackling a figure who has been done exceptionally poorly or not at all.

But yeah, I'll keep these guys:

I do wonder, though, as I look at the picture the original poster presented... Do those even transform? I don't see any obvious signs of the process. Are we sure they are not just robot mode only figures? (If they do transform, and do so into something that looks good, I will admit I'll be mildly impressed.)

Rated X wrote:Less Hasbro in my opinion is a good thing.

Never mind... so not getting into this again...

by **Rated X** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:02 pm

Yotsuyasan wrote:I am more then happy with my Classics Scourge & Sweeps, and cannot help but wonder once again at a third party that is redoing a character who has already been done well enough, rather then tackling a figure who has been done exceptionally poorly or not at all.

But yeah, I'll keep these guys:

I do wonder, though, as I look at the picture the original poster presented... Do those even transform? I don't see any obvious signs of the process. Are we sure they are not just robot mode only figures? (If they do transform, and do so into something that looks good, I will admit I'll be mildly impressed.)

Rated X wrote:Less Hasbro in my opinion is a good thing.

Never mind... so not getting into this again...

Yet you still chose to quote me and hit submit ? Not looking for an arguement either, just saying... :-?

Anytime I can get a figure that doesnt have to meet silly child safety standards Im happy. When I can get a figure that has a more G1 alt mode because it doesnt have to appeal to todays five year olds, Im even happier. So yes, sometimes a little less Hasbro can be a good thing for me personally.

News Credits: 1 · by **Gauntlet101010** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:35 pm

It's true that this doesn't look like it transforms. But you never know, Whoever's making this could surprise us.

News Credits: 767 · by **Dead Metal** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:46 pm

Sorry to pop your bubble but this is BS. The pic was taken from here
http://wizardofosmond.deviantart.com/gallery/

Thanks to Daimchoc from who's FB page I stole this from.

News Credits: 33 · by **Genocide G2.0** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:19 pm

Hmm that's a shame the image was floating all over FB today they'll be a few disappointed face's that includes mine :-(

, nice catch on Yotsuyasans behalf with not transforming and this would explain why. Maybe one day eh?. cheers DM.

by **Rated X** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:46 pm

Oh well...

At least were getting a better Galvatron...

by **Rated X** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:48 pm

Oh well...

At least were getting a better Galvatron...

News Credits: 119 · by **daimchoc** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:19 pm

That pic was pulled from this gallery: http://wizardofosmond.deviantart.com/gallery/... So, right now we don't really know if this is actually going to be produced by a 3rd party

News Credits: 1 · by **Gauntlet101010** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:51 pm

Oh, well. I have no problem with Generations Scourge.

News Credits: 10 · by **Agamemnon** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:44 pm

Titanium all the way, baby! :KREMZEEK:

News Credits: 1 · by **Gauntlet101010** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:01 pm

Agamemnon wrote:Titanium all the way, baby!

I actually do like the Titanium version. It's a shame it has almost no usable articulation.

News Credits: 112 · by **megatronus** » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:40 pm

Glad these aren't real!

I have an United Scourge (as Scourge) and 4 Generations Scourges (as Sweeps) and just bought 4 more, to battle my Junkion army (mostly Junkheaps and Wreck-gars I got en-masse when they were at T.J. Maxx/Marshalls, with some Maiden Japan and Lucky Rogers kits thrown in for fun).

Wouldn't want to upset the delicate balance that is my 1986 movie display

News Credits: 4 · by **Tsutsukakushi** » Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:12 pm

I was hoping this would be real,as it looked awesome. It looks like this custom borrowed a few parts from Classics Cyclonus. The Titanium & Classics toys are too small,We need bigger versions.