Okay you limey fruitcake, I shouldn't be wasting too much words on a person like you but here go's, I guess it's just too much fun winning the internetz.
1. You say the ps3 is the winner of the console wars based on a demonstration of a hyped game.
You score 5 stupid points.
2. You then continue by saying that "It beat the Wii in innovation because you can make your own levels to share with everyone else".
Game not Console. Your making a completely flawed comparison here, comparing the innovation of a game to that of a console.
"From what I have seen the 360 is the winner cause Gears of war is awesome looking and better then the ps3" <-- makes about as much sense as your logic.
3. Since you tried to attack me on sentence structure and spelling ill just return the favor.
"it beats Microsoft because the Sony network thingy is free where Xbox Live cost money, the graphics even on youtube looks like something out of toy story, and it has the potential to have tons of down loadable content."
The graphics of what look like that of Toy story? XBL? The menu? Ps3? 360? Your mom? And this stuff about the 'network thingy' having the potential of tons of content. Guess what, XBL already HAS tons of downloadable content, I guess that means the 360 wins eh? Damn your last statement is such a mess, it just doesn't make sense.
Also, it's downloadable (one word buddy).
4. "Can't this is exclusive.".
Here i'll give you a simple explaination as to why you missed the point. We'll do this step by step and i'll hold your hand in the progress so you won't get lost.
"It beat the Wii with innovation and Microsoft with Graphics/power."
This is what you claimed. Now 'It' can mean two things in this context. 1. The PS3 or 2. Little Big World. Since you didn't made it clear what 'it' is we'll just go through both options.
1. The PS3: Yes the console has some slightely more powerful components build in when compared to the 360. It has however yet to prove it is capable of showing graphics that can blow the 360 away.
2. Little Big World: This is only laughable since it hardly showed jaw dropping visuals.
Now I replied to your post with "The 360 could easily run a game of this graphic level and if the wii could, then no doubt this game could be adepted to have funky wii controls."
Meaning that if the game was ported to the 360, the 360 wouldn't have any trouble running the game. So the "ps3 beats the 360 in power" argument wouldn't be proven with this game. Whenever the game is an exclusive or not is totally irrelevant! Hench you missed the point of the post. But with explaination given above this problem is now corrected right?
Now the "It beat the Wii with innovation"
part is just a laughable offense and i'll only reply with this simple picture that says it all.
As for my stance in the current console war (pathetic as it might be), I am indeed a 360 owner. A fanboy I am not, I have plenty complains about the 360. It's just that the 360 is the better option when you compare it with the PS3. The wii is a whole different story, I don't like it much but no doubt it's a great party machine.
I also ordered a Ps2 yesterday for fighting games like melty blood and street fighter third strike. But most of all I am a PC gamer, since it's just that much better.