Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

by **Cyberion** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:30 am

Ok,

But apparently you're in the minority on that opinion, judging by the ticket sales for DOTM. For everyone who agrees with you, there are many many people who've seen it and do not agree. Now, had the majority of people who saw the movie hated it but the so-called Transformer fan boy crowd loved it, we'd be looking at different ticket sales figures. Apparently the move was designed for a more mainstream audience and it managed to achieve doing that in a rather big way.

News Credits: 1 · by **Spleenzorio** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:41 am

Dr. Heavy B wrote:suck it roger ebert, all your hate cant stop the people

Taken from Wikipedia:

Roger Ebert gave the film one out of four stars, calling it "a visually ugly film with an incoherent plot, wooden characters and inane dialog. It provided me with one of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies.

Visually ugly film? Wow. Maybe they shouldn't let people who don't have full control of their face critic (critique?) movies :-?

News Credits: 37 · by **SlyTF1** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:45 am

Spleenzorio wrote:
Dr. Heavy B wrote:suck it roger ebert, all your hate cant stop the people

Taken from Wikipedia:

Roger Ebert gave the film one out of four stars, calling it "a visually ugly film with an incoherent plot, wooden characters and inane dialog. It provided me with one of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies.

Visually ugly film? Wow. Maybe they shouldn't let people who don't have full control of their face critic movies

He's blind. Visually ugly? He must be one of the people who thought Avatar looked realistic. The characters weren't totally wooden, but the plot kind of was incoherent...too bad that's not enough to take this movie off my list of favorite movie of all time.

News Credits: 1 · by **Spleenzorio** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:14 pm

SlyTF1 wrote:
Spleenzorio wrote:
Dr. Heavy B wrote:suck it roger ebert, all your hate cant stop the people

Taken from Wikipedia:

Roger Ebert gave the film one out of four stars, calling it "a visually ugly film with an incoherent plot, wooden characters and inane dialog. It provided me with one of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies.

Visually ugly film? Wow. Maybe they shouldn't let people who don't have full control of their face critic movies

He's blind. Visually ugly? He must be one of the people who thought Avatar looked realistic. The characters weren't totally wooden, but the plot kind of was incoherent...too bad that's not enough to take this movie off my list of favorite movie of all time.

Exactly. You can't argue with the amount of success the film is making, the numbers are right there. I love all 3 movies as a whole, even if all my favorite ones died in the end

by **Cyberion** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:32 pm

Ebert needs to be put out to pasture anyway. He's dead wrong on this film. Thankfully, film goers don't base the movies they choose to see on the opinions of hack/critics like Ebert.

by **Evil_the_Nub** » Mon Jul 25, 2011 4:11 pm

Cyberion wrote:Ebert needs to be put out to pasture anyway. He's dead wrong on this film. Thankfully, film goers don't base the movies they choose to see on the opinions of hack/critics like Ebert.

For real, what really puzzles me is is spite of his complaints of the Transformers movies he liked Cloverfield. That movie is the poster child of ugly visuals and incoherent plots.