Re: Marvel movie sequel updates: Trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man 2!
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:42 pm
So this is what The Sentinels will look like.
Seibertron.com - The Ultimate Transformers Fansite
https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/
https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=88797
Rodimus Prime wrote:So this is what The Sentinels will look like.
Shadowman wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:So this is what The Sentinels will look like.
Kind of ballsy to make them look like a broken image link. I don't think the redesign will go over well with the fandom.
Rodimus Prime wrote:Shadowman wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:So this is what The Sentinels will look like.
Kind of ballsy to make them look like a broken image link. I don't think the redesign will go over well with the fandom.
I can see it fine...
Rodimus Prime wrote:Now I can't see it either....what did you do??? Just use Burn's link...
I thought the same thing................but look at what they are doing with Quicksilver and his sister.Shadowman wrote:The film rights are owned by Sony, though. Daredevil's rights were owned by Fox, but the rights went back to Marvel so Fox could keep X-Men and Fantastic Four. If Marvel wants what is basically a Daredevil character to be used on a Spider-Man movie, it would mean giving up the rights again, and right now, everyone is desperately trying to hold on to what they've got.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I thought the same thing................but look at what they are doing with Quicksilver and his sister.Shadowman wrote:The film rights are owned by Sony, though. Daredevil's rights were owned by Fox, but the rights went back to Marvel so Fox could keep X-Men and Fantastic Four. If Marvel wants what is basically a Daredevil character to be used on a Spider-Man movie, it would mean giving up the rights again, and right now, everyone is desperately trying to hold on to what they've got.
Renne wrote:the problem ("problem") with quicksilver and scarlet witch (she has a name okay)
........is that they're known as being avengers, but they're also known as being mutants and magnetos kids.
which is how both marvel and fox manage to get away with using them.
marvel can use them as they have the avengers franchise, but they're not allowed to make any mention to them being mutants or to magneto (general consensus is that coming out of the infinity event in the MCU they're going to be inhumans and not mutants, since making there be a whole bunch of new spontaneous supes via the terrigen mists is probably how marvel is getting around not being able to use kids spontaneously developing powers via mutancy).
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Kingpin is as known for being a Daredevil as he is for being one of Spidies villains.,.....So if it can be done with the twins, why not the big guy?
Renne wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Kingpin is as known for being a Daredevil as he is for being one of Spidies villains.,.....So if it can be done with the twins, why not the big guy?
i guess that depends on if the rogues gallery goes with the rights as well which is not something i know about. also i'm not a spidey fan so i didn't realise the kingpin was one of his to start with... i pretty much only ever hear of him in terms of coming up against daredevil.
Renne wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:I thought the same thing................but look at what they are doing with Quicksilver and his sister.Shadowman wrote:The film rights are owned by Sony, though. Daredevil's rights were owned by Fox, but the rights went back to Marvel so Fox could keep X-Men and Fantastic Four. If Marvel wants what is basically a Daredevil character to be used on a Spider-Man movie, it would mean giving up the rights again, and right now, everyone is desperately trying to hold on to what they've got.
the problem ("problem") with quicksilver and scarlet witch (she has a name okay) is that they're known as being avengers, but they're also known as being mutants and magnetos kids.
which is how both marvel and fox manage to get away with using them.
marvel can use them as they have the avengers franchise, but they're not allowed to make any mention to them being mutants or to magneto (general consensus is that coming out of the infinity event in the MCU they're going to be inhumans and not mutants, since making there be a whole bunch of new spontaneous supes via the terrigen mists is probably how marvel is getting around not being able to use kids spontaneously developing powers via mutancy).
fox own the rights to mutants (hence all the x-characters except for namor who is owned by universal (?????)) which means they can use them AND mention that they're mutants - whether or not they're decided to be inhumans in the MCU - and their relationship to magneto, but they're not allowed to make any reference to the avengers.
Shadowman wrote:Actually the thing is that Quicksilver is confirmed to be in both Age of Ultron and Days of Future Past, despite everything we know up until now suggesting that can't happen. He's going to be the first character to have been in both an X-Men movie and an Avengers movie.
Renne wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Kingpin is as known for being a Daredevil as he is for being one of Spidies villains.,.....So if it can be done with the twins, why not the big guy?
i guess that depends on if the rogues gallery goes with the rights as well which is not something i know about. also i'm not a spidey fan so i didn't realise the kingpin was one of his to start with... i pretty much only ever hear of him in terms of coming up against daredevil.
eta; wait so is what you're saying that he's been claimed as a spidey villain?? MADNESS.
Shadowman wrote:
Actually the thing is that Quicksilver is confirmed to be in both Age of Ultron and Days of Future Past, despite everything we know up until now suggesting that can't happen. He's going to be the first character to have been in both an X-Men movie and an Avengers movie.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Shadowman wrote:
Actually the thing is that Quicksilver is confirmed to be in both Age of Ultron and Days of Future Past, despite everything we know up until now suggesting that can't happen. He's going to be the first character to have been in both an X-Men movie and an Avengers movie.
I think what we will see with Avengers "Quicksilver" is what we saw with the IronPatriot.
Meaning that we get a guy with the code name but not the alter ego.
Shadowman wrote:So, a speedster named Quicksilver...but it's not Pietro Maximoff? That makes sense. Kind of a huge cop-out, but it makes sense.
agreed.And to be honest, Iron Patriot was kind of pointless as well. They could have kept him as War Machine and nothing would have changed except cutting out a running gag.