Re: The biggest cinematic FAIL of all time?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:08 pm
njb902 wrote:Rabble rabble rabble rabble change bad rabble rabble rabble rabble!
Yeah, pretty much.
Duke of Luns wrote:The armor just looks so plain and boring, like some sort of parody superhero.
And the original didn't look totally goofy at all...
Duke of Luns wrote:It doesn't look like a man who's become a machine, it looks almost form fitting, not nearly bulky enough.
Looks about as bulky as Iron Man to me. Aside from which, look at Adam Jensen. If you don't know who that is, then let me explain: he's not wearing armor, those are his actual arms. Cyborg armor really depends on how much of him is still human.
Duke of Luns wrote:However, the "on the set pics" do have some nice detailing if you look close...but the black just makes it all blend together. The helmet also looks a little off(visor's too big?), but not too bad. However, still kinda bland. It really needs color.
The second pic, the one Burn posted, is a...I actually don't know what color that is. Like a very dark...teal, almost? It's hard to say. I do like the visor sort of blending in to the rest of the helmet in the first pic, though.
That said, black armor...I don't want to say black armor is "in" becuase it's always been "in." No one complained about Darth Vader until he took the armor off...
Duke of Luns wrote:Still though, the design of the suit could be overlooked if the end product is good, and there's no way to even contemplate that until a trailer is shown.
Gary Oldman, Samuel L Jackson, Michael Keaton, and Jackie Earl Haley are on the cast list. So there's that.