Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Shadowman wrote:

SentinelA confirmed as troll.

A really really really REALLY Bad troll, too.

So um, on topic. About the suit, Notice that one hand is bare, while the other isn't. Why would you do that intentionally?

BeastProwl wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

SentinelA confirmed as troll.

A really really really REALLY Bad troll, too.

So um, on topic. About the suit, Notice that one hand is bare, while the other isn't. Why would you do that intentionally?

It's probably going to be CGI'd over.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Biggest of all time? No. Not even close.

Battlefield Earth

Yep, that was a pretty bad movie. Still not as bad as most Uwe Boll movies - the worst I've seen was House of the dead...

Waterworld
Lost in Space

Funny, but I find those two pretty good popcorn-movies, and they are worth more in my eyes than 90% of anything that was made in the last three-four years.

Shadowman wrote:

BeastProwl wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

SentinelA confirmed as troll.

A really really really REALLY Bad troll, too.

So um, on topic. About the suit, Notice that one hand is bare, while the other isn't. Why would you do that intentionally?

It's probably going to be CGI'd over.

That was what I was thinking, but you still have to wonder, why go with such a skinny, stealthy look? Why no add a little bit of bulk? It's not that I dont like it, I just think it would look better bulked up a little bit.

Probably because skinny is easier to move around in, any actor who's had to wear a suit of armor for a movie can tell you that.

Shadowman wrote:Probably because skinny is easier to move around in, any actor who's had to wear a suit of armor for a movie can tell you that.

They should have made him an action figure then

There. Topics are merged. Let this be a lesson to name your threads correctly or you end up annoying the Mods who have to come along and clean up after you. We have enough spambots making messes, we don't need sentients doing the same either.

And quit labeling people trolls. Some of you are just as bad or even worse.

Burn wrote:And quit labeling people trolls. Some of you are just as bad or even worse.

Someone starts criticizing Obama in a thread about a redesign for Robocop, as a way of saying the new movie will be bad. What could that be other than trolling?

Shadowman wrote:

Burn wrote:And quit labeling people trolls. Some of you are just as bad or even worse.

Someone starts criticizing Obama in a thread about a redesign for Robocop, as a way of saying the new movie will be bad. What could that be other than trolling?

Regardless of whether they did or didn't (yes i'm well aware what was posted) it still does NOT give YOU the right to go around giving someone what is essentially a derogatory label, even if said party did turn around and admit to being such.

For all intents and purposes SentinelA SHOULD be given a warning, as per the rules. But if we dished out warnings every time someone danced on the wrong side of the line most of us would probably be banned.

For now, this thread is back on topic. If people have a problem with my Moderating then feel free to pm me and discuss it with me.

Rodimus Prime wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Duke of Luns wrote:Technically you're right, but come on, ED-209 was a tool used by a villian, and was Robocop's doppleganger of sorts. Plus it was an effects heavy creation that really messed up Robocop in one scene. So if not a villian, perhaps antagonist. Here's hoping whatever new antagonist Robocop faces is as imaginitive and memorable as ED-209.

I know for a fact ED-209 is going to be in this.

Yeah, I've seen shots of it and it also looks like crap compared to the original. Not intimidating at all. It better have some kick ass weaponry.

You mean the one on that promo OCP webpage? I read on another site that it's just a very early concept design that has since been changed to a much better looking one. Haven't seen any of those new designs, though.