Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:30 am**

I just came across a character (no names will be mentioned) that had their strength past 11.

So this is a reminder to all.

This particular bug is to NOT be exploited. Anyone caught doing so will be dealt with accordingly.

If you see any characters with ANY stats past 10 notify a Moderator IMMEDIATELY VIA PM. Do NOT create a thread about it.

And do NOT ask how it's done.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:52 am**

Was the character at least named Spinal Tap?

But yeah, Burnsy if I see any shenanigans I'll let ya know.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:01 am**

Loki God Of Mischief wrote:Was the character at least named Spinal Tap?

Nope.

But given that I found a second character from the same team, i'm a tad pissed off right now ...

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:25 am**

And here I was thinking already covered this topic when N_V made a thread specifically asking whether it was legal to exploit said glitch not too long ago #-o

edit
now that I check, it was December last year. Who said I have no track of time?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:38 am**

What gets me is anyone with the ability to stock up any skill to 11 has to have been playing a decent amount of time to know that using that exploit is considered an illegal move.

#-o

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:40 am**

yet we have armor rank of 11
go figure

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:45 am**

steve2275 wrote:yet we have armor rank of 11
go figure

Correct me If I'm wrong but isn't the Force Field listed as 11 not for the requirement, but because it could only be issued by winning the opportunity in tourney's?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:25 am**

Editor wrote:
steve2275 wrote:yet we have armor rank of 11
go figure

Correct me If I'm wrong but isn't the Force Field listed as 11 not for the requirement, but because it could only be issued by winning the opportunity in tourney's?

this is why i dont post very much

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:05 pm**

Editor wrote:
steve2275 wrote:yet we have armor rank of 11
go figure

Correct me If I'm wrong but isn't the Force Field listed as 11 not for the requirement, but because it could only be issued by winning the opportunity in tourney's?

I think that was a left over from "The Fallen" NPC.

Posted: **Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:47 am**

Loki God Of Mischief wrote:Was the character at least named Spinal Tap?

This made my morning. :lol:

Posted: **Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:18 am**

Me, Grimlock! wrote:
Loki God Of Mischief wrote:Was the character at least named Spinal Tap?

This made my morning.

It's what I do. :grin:

Posted: **Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:45 am**

Burn wrote:
Editor wrote:
steve2275 wrote:yet we have armor rank of 11
go figure

Correct me If I'm wrong but isn't the Force Field listed as 11 not for the requirement, but because it could only be issued by winning the opportunity in tourney's?

I think that was a left over from "The Fallen" NPC.

Boy was that guy a bitch to fight.

Posted: **Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:21 am**

i miss that mission

Posted: **Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:06 am**

If someone wants to spend over 2 million xp on a single stat point forgoing a dozen others is it really that big of a deal?

Posted: **Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:11 am**

The Legend wrote:If someone wants to spend over 2 million xp on a single stat point forgoing a dozen others is it really that big of a deal?

apparantly. the main point is rules are rules, and they are meant to be followed. also some people (like me) have to spend 2 million for any stat (unless we want to dump into stats we dont need like int or skill), so cranking your top stat to 11, or 12, or 13 isnt that bad of an option.

its outside of the games set parameters and we should all respect that

Posted: **Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:28 am**

Name_Violation wrote:
The Legend wrote:If someone wants to spend over 2 million xp on a single stat point forgoing a dozen others is it really that big of a deal?

apparantly. the main point is rules are rules, and they are meant to be followed. also some people (like me) have to spend 2 million for any stat (unless we want to dump into stats we dont need like int or skill), so cranking your top stat to 11, or 12, or 13 isnt that bad of an option.

its outside of the games set parameters and we should all respect that

It's my understanding that the game mechanics are only coded to work with stats up to 10, and that stats of 11 tend to **** the game up big time.

Posted: **Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:58 pm**

Pretty much my understanding to. That kiddies is what made minicons bad to, course i think there was a cat by the name of Murderplex who solved that issue.

Posted: **Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:31 pm**

omg...Burn is a moderator...what has HMW come to

Posted: **Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:35 pm**

RoS goes away and sprokitz returns. Interesting ...

Posted: **Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:37 pm**

yeah, very interesting

...whoever RoS is.

Just wait til I get my first upgrade...at my current rate that'll be by 2014.

Posted: **Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:10 pm**

sprockitz wrote:yeah, very interesting ...whoever RoS is.

Just wait til I get my first upgrade...at my current rate that'll be by 2014.

That's nothing. I'd be lucky if I have one of my guys upgraded to level 1 before Sarah Palin becomes president.

Posted: **Fri Jul 29, 2011 2:40 pm**

Super Megatron wrote:
sprockitz wrote:yeah, very interesting ...whoever RoS is.

Just wait til I get my first upgrade...at my current rate that'll be by 2014.

That's nothing. I'd be lucky if I have one of my guys upgraded to level 1 before Sarah Palin becomes president.

I might break into the top 900 bots soon.

Posted: **Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:38 pm**

What I was annoyed to see was a con (no names mentioned) with every stat a infinity! i think thats an exploit of the infinity option.

Posted: **Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:42 pm**

Care to pm a link to said character?

Because I don't think such things are possible.

Posted: **Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:55 pm**

Sorry bro. didnt catch the name. :sad:

Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Stats going past 10

Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10

Re: Stats going past 10