Prime Riblet wrote:Blast Cannon wrote:Sabrblade wrote:The same could be said about the likes of Leonard Nimoy, Tony Todd, Hugo Weaving, John stinkin' Goodman(!), etc. Still can't believe we got John Goodman in Transformers.Blast Cannon wrote:Sabrblade wrote:As poor quality as it is (and it certainly is), it keeps raking in the big bucks regardless, which could very well be another nice paycheck in their pockets.Blast Cannon wrote:Seriously though, the movie franchise is a high profile nonsensical joke. Sure Pacino and Nelson have had their share of stinkers but they'd be stupid to go into a product that is already known for being poor quality.
They're hardly impoverished and in need of a quick buck are they? It'd be a real surprise if a big name attached themselves to the franchise now, imo. I was taken aback when I read Mark Wahlberg has signed up!
Then again, also still can't believe with got Tim Curry and Mark Hamill in Transformers (even if in one of the cartoons rather than the movies).
Arguably they all got involved before the franchise turned into obvious ****.
So, since John Goodman was just in AoE, are you saying the franchise turning to obvious **** is still in the future? Or is it happening currently? Please explain as I am merely a piece of meat.
As a piece of meat you wouldn't understand the quantum physics. There are no meat based analogies that would make sense outside of the discovery of a new meat that tasted like **** but was packaged really attractively, coupled with an intelligent and aggressive advertising campaign. This future meat would also need a disgruntled but compliant online fanbase.
See? I bet you're stumped.