Rated X wrote:I honestly believe the Bay contract for TF 4,5, and 6 is what killed TF Prime.
They stopped making episodes because they wanted to. The ending that we got is the ending they wanted all along. This isn't like what happened with Animated season 4 getting axed. There was never going to be more story to TF: Prime beyond the resurrection of Cybertron. The fact that we're getting an epilogue movie as a bonus is nothing short of a stroke of good fortune.
Rated X wrote:I have no proof, but Im not buying into the official explanations that we indeed got the original script as it was intended.
Why? What reasons could they possibly have for lying about how the business works when so many other shows that ended without cancellation have done the exact same thing?
Rated X wrote:No way are they gonna name a whole series after a term that was only used loosly for a couple episodes (Beast Hunters)
It wasn't its own series. It was season 3 of Transformers: Prime, with a subtitle forced upon it by Hasbro's wanting to promote a new sales gimmick, just like Armada's "The Unicron Battles", Energon's "The Powerlinx Battles", Cybertron's "Primus Unleashed", and more.
Rated X wrote:Predaking was supposed to have an army and it was very suspect that they were killed off before they became relevant. Yet so many beasts were made in the toy line. And Im not buying the old "CG is too expensive" excuse people have suggested about Lazerback, Ripclaw, Grimwing, etc.
Do you have any experience in the field of CGI development? Or have you researched any history of CG television shows? If so, you would know good and well and that CGI
is an expensive thing.
Look at past fully CG TF shows. Beast Wars had a TON of toy characters, yet only had no more than 5 to 7 regular characters per faction each season. Same with Beast Machines. 4 to 7 Maximals, 3 to 4 Vehicons at at a time, and the only armies were duplicates of existing models.
Energon and Cybertron could get away with bigger casts because A) those shows were only half-CG, and B) their CG was utter crud by comparison to the fully CG shows.
Rated X wrote:Only having one Beast (Predaking) just doesnt seem to go along with any logical reason to call the series Beast Hunters.
Hence why the name led to many being fooled by its misleading nature.
Rated X wrote:I honestly believe when they came up with the name, the idea was that the Autobots would be hunting actual Beasts most of the season, not bones for a couple episodes.
More like the toy company wanted to do something that was forced upon the cartoon that already had its ending set in stone, and this is far from the first time the toy makers forced a major change upon the fiction
to sell toys.
Rated X wrote:I think Hasbro just told Peter Cullen, we got something more important for you to work on. Keep the check we gave you, and heres a bigger check. For those of you who believe Hasbro, more power to you. But in the real world, corporations improvise when a decision needs to be made. Then put out a carefully written statement that makes them look good but might not be the real truth.
And yet, even when ROTF was being made, that didn't put a halt to Animated's production.
This whole idea that the movies somehow dictate whether a cartoon should or shouldn't continue just reeks of paranoia.
Stinkin'
Rescue Bots is still gonna keep going with its cartoon despite TF4 taking center stage. Wouldn't one think that something as minor as
that show would get the boot before TF: Prime? I mean, if the movies did have some control over TF cartoons' airing, wouldn't Rescue Bots be the easiest target for TF4 to shut down?