Submit News Contact Us Translate Sign in Join

imperial navy vs star fleet

Got a crazy idea of a fantasy battle? Want to know if Unicron would defeat the Death Star? Debate your favorite fantasy battles here!

imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby shortwave » Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:03 am

Motto: "eagls may soar but weasels dont get sucked in to jet engens"
Weapon: Sub-Machine Gun
mission of peace vs mission of conquest
User avatar
shortwave
Fuzor
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:33 am
Location: my own hell
Strength: 2
Intelligence: 3
Speed: 7
Endurance: 5
Rank: 1
Courage: Infinity
Firepower: 3
Skill: 1

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby JetOptimus23 » Fri Nov 26, 2010 9:26 am

Motto: "I hecked up"
Weapon: Dirge Gun
I'm going to go with The Empire here. Let's face it, the enterprise wouldn't hold up against a Star Destroyer for long. And a whole fleet of Star Destroyers...
PROFESSIONAL ARMADA APOLOGIST

Currently on a quest to collect as many Unicron Trilogy toys as possible...maybe even complete the collection...
Image
User avatar
JetOptimus23
Godmaster
Posts: 1742
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:30 am
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas
Strength: 1
Intelligence: 7
Speed: 1
Endurance: 1
Rank: 1
Courage: 1
Firepower: 1
Skill: 1

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Jesterhead » Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:58 pm

Motto: "We'll die just as we lived: In midnight clad. Ave dominus nox."
Weapon: Gyro-Inhibitor Shell Launcher
JetOptimus23 wrote:I'm going to go with The Empire here. Let's face it, the enterprise wouldn't hold up against a Star Destroyer for long. And a whole fleet of Star Destroyers...


I think the Enterprise D would give any I-class Star Destroyer a sound whooping.

Though I think the Empire would take it. Due to their use of fast fighters. No way phaser banks and photon torpedoes could could nail a swarm of TIE fighters. Star Trek battles are mostly capital ship slug-fests.
Image
User avatar
Jesterhead
Gestalt Team Leader
Posts: 951
News Credits: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:00 am
Location: C:\Windows\System32
Watch Jesterhead on YouTube
Strength: 4
Intelligence: 7
Speed: 9
Endurance: 6
Rank: 9
Courage: 1
Firepower: 8
Skill: 5

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby MightyMagnus78 » Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:28 pm

Motto: ""Consistency is victory.""
Weapon: Shoulder Mounted Rocket Launcher
Just like WW2, I've always imagined Star Fleet ships would be the equivalent of a battleship, while a Star Destroyer is more like an aircraft carrier, able to deploy smaller fighters against the enemy. Star Destroyer's would have to be significantly larger than their Star Trek counterparts, also giving them an advantage.

So, my money is on the carrier!
Image
User avatar
MightyMagnus78
Brainmaster
Posts: 1460
News Credits: 1
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:35 pm
Location: Cannock, Staffordshire, England
Strength: 9
Intelligence: 9
Speed: 6
Endurance: 8
Rank: 8
Courage: 9
Firepower: 6
Skill: 8

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:00 pm

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
Yeah, I'm going with the Empire here. I dunno about Star Trek ships, but it only takes a bombardment from three Star Destroyers to completely wreck the face of a planet.
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby RK_Striker_JK_5 » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:11 pm

Motto: ""I am a warrior. Let the battle be joined.""
Weapon: Electron Gun
Shadowman wrote:Yeah, I'm going with the Empire here. I dunno about Star Trek ships, but it only takes a bombardment from three Star Destroyers to completely wreck the face of a planet.


And TOS had General Order 24, involving the complete destruction of a planet's surface. ;)

Anyway... stalemate. the Imperial Navy has no true map of viable hyperspace routes through the Milky Way and the anomalies of the week would quickly befuddle and/or kill them.

Meanwhile, the GFFA is simply too large and spread out for Starfleet to make any true headway. And now, I am out. because such a topic can only lead to flame wars. :HEADHURTS: ;)^
Not caring about scale since 1984. Just like Hasbro.

My reviews of Transformers G1, one episode at a time. Stop by for a spell!
RK_Striker_JK_5
City Commander
Posts: 3380
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:48 pm
Location: New Hampshire
Strength: 4
Intelligence: 9
Speed: 6
Endurance: 10
Rank: 2
Courage: 9
Firepower: 4
Skill: 6

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:50 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Shadowman wrote:Yeah, I'm going with the Empire here. I dunno about Star Trek ships, but it only takes a bombardment from three Star Destroyers to completely wreck the face of a planet.


And its been said [ never seen ] that Kirks first Enterprise could do the same in a matter of minutes.

That being said, I really cant give an answer here,.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby ebilly99 » Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:19 am

Watch this, star trek would pwn any destroyer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFCBwob65Nw
ebilly99
Vehicon
Posts: 371
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 7:50 pm

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:22 am

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
ebilly99 wrote:Watch this, star trek would pwn any destroyer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFCBwob65Nw


Funny.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Cyberstrike » Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:17 am

Motto: "I don't lose, I CONQUER!"
Weapon: Electro-Sword
Depends really on which Starfleet we're talking about.

The 22rd Century Starfleet (from Star Trek: Enterprise) would most likely been the weakest of the Starfleets due their weaker technology and they would have the least combat experience of any of them.

They would still give the Imperial Navy a run for their money but the the Imperial Navy would win.


In the 23rd Century (from Star Trek: The Original Series and movies 1-6 and 11) I would go with Starfleet winning but just barely namely because of Captain Kirk would out think the Imperial Navy.

23rd Century Starfleet would win but just barely


In the 24th Century (from ]Star Trek: The Next Generation, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek: Voyager and movies 7-10) Starfleet would mop the floor with the Imperial Navy, they would have more ships, the most combat experience (the Cardassian War, and Dominion War, the fights with the Borg and Romulans) than Kirk and Archer ever did, the best technology from the Borg, and the future, and quite honestly their ships are more movable, faster, and they have better weapon systems.

24th Century Starfleet would kick the crap out the Imperial Navy.


Final verdict: Starfleet.
Image
The X-WCW is the best e-fed in the world today!
Cyberstrike
Gestalt
Posts: 2544
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 2:33 pm
Location: Indiana
Watch Cyberstrike on YouTube
Strength: 10+
Intelligence: 9
Speed: Infinity
Endurance: Infinity
Rank: 10+
Courage: 10+
Firepower: 8
Skill: 5

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Rodimus Prime » Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:25 am

Motto: "...and hell followed with him."
Weapon: Twin Photon Blasters
I'm considering only the OT of Star Wars and TOS of Star Trek here.

The ships would probably keep annihilating each other, but if Vader's ship is involved, it would most likely tip the scales, due to being one big ass ship with powerful weapons, as well as Vader himself, most likely. Remember, he could probably choke out every Star Fleet officer even if he has to do it one by one. Or does he have to be within a certain range?

If Vader and/or the Emperor are not involved, it would just be a firefight, and it would most likely be impossible to tell who would win.
............Image
User avatar
Rodimus Prime
God Of Transformers
Posts: 15626
News Credits: 17
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 8:31 pm
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Psycho Warrior » Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:16 pm

Motto: "Treachery keeps everyone on their toes."
Weapon: Corrosive Slime Shooter
Jesterhead wrote:
JetOptimus23 wrote:I'm going to go with The Empire here. Let's face it, the enterprise wouldn't hold up against a Star Destroyer for long. And a whole fleet of Star Destroyers...


I think the Enterprise D would give any I-class Star Destroyer a sound whooping.

Though I think the Empire would take it. Due to their use of fast fighters. No way phaser banks and photon torpedoes could could nail a swarm of TIE fighters. Star Trek battles are mostly capital ship slug-fests.

I have to agree with you there. TIEs may not have a huge armament but there's a ton of them and a single ship to single ship fight turns into one vs squadrons plus enemy capital ship
Image
The Happy Locust wrote:Effort is not power, knowledge is not power, even money is not power. True power is not caring that you f*ck up all the time.
User avatar
Psycho Warrior
God Of Transformers
Posts: 36800
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 8:54 pm
Location: Antarctica, enjoying summer.
Strength: 5
Intelligence: 7
Speed: 6
Endurance: 8
Rank: 2
Courage: 5
Firepower: 6
Skill: 9

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Praxus Prime » Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:44 pm

Motto: "Guitars aren't just good for playing music; they can also be used to beat people's brains out!"
Weapon: Semi-Automatic Rifle
I'm gonna go with the Empire. They didn't control most of the galaxy for nothing.
Image
User avatar
Praxus Prime
Brainmaster
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:20 pm
Location: East Ridge, TN
Watch Praxus Prime on YouTube
Strength: 4
Intelligence: 6
Speed: 5
Endurance: 5
Rank: 7
Courage: 5
Firepower: 7
Skill: 6

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:03 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Praxus Prime wrote:I'm gonna go with the Empire. They didn't control most of the galaxy for nothing.


From what I understand they didnt control most of their galaxy.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:43 pm

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Praxus Prime wrote:I'm gonna go with the Empire. They didn't control most of the galaxy for nothing.


From what I understand they didnt control most of their galaxy.


Depends on what you mean by "Most." They had 70,000,000 planets under their belt at their peak. There are around 200,000,000,000 stars had planets that could support life. And while that's actually a really low percentage, realize that Felicia, Korriban, and Tatooine can all technically support life, and I think few people here would want to buy a house on any of those planets.

Still, whatever planets they didn't take were probably crappy or useless anyway. Everything else they got through deception, intimidation, or force. How many planets has Star Fleet taken by force?
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:48 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Shadowman wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Praxus Prime wrote:I'm gonna go with the Empire. They didn't control most of the galaxy for nothing.


From what I understand they didnt control most of their galaxy.


Depends on what you mean by "Most." They had 70,000,000 planets under their belt at their peak. There are around 200,000,000,000 stars had planets that could support life. And while that's actually a really low percentage, realize that Felicia, Korriban, and Tatooine can all technically support life, and I think few people here would want to buy a house on any of those planets.[/quopte]

There are also large areas of unclaimed space in the SW universe.

How many planets has Star Fleet taken by force?


The fact that star fleet doesnt operate that way doesn't mean it couldn't if it wanted too.

Just look at the Terran empire of the mirror universe.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Thu Dec 23, 2010 8:13 pm

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:The fact that star fleet doesnt operate that way doesn't mean it couldn't if it wanted too.


And like I said, the Empire could have taken the rest of known space if they wanted to. It's just, why waste the effort trying to conquer Tatooine?

And no, I really doubt Star Fleet could have taken 70,000,000 planets by force. They don't have nearly enough resources.
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:19 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Shadowman wrote:And like I said, the Empire could have taken the rest of known space if they wanted to. It's just, why waste the effort trying to conquer Tatooine?


Thats an assumption based on little facts.

Meaning, theres no reason to assume the un-claimed areas of space are anything like Tatooine.
And no, I really doubt Star Fleet could have taken 70,000,000 planets by force. They don't have nearly enough resources.


I dont think I suggested a number of planets as a comparison.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:38 pm

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:And like I said, the Empire could have taken the rest of known space if they wanted to. It's just, why waste the effort trying to conquer Tatooine?


Thats an assumption based on little facts.

Meaning, theres no reason to assume the un-claimed areas of space are anything like Tatooine.


It was an example. The Unknown Regions aren't all composed of copies of Aleraan either.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
And no, I really doubt Star Fleet could have taken 70,000,000 planets by force. They don't have nearly enough resources.


I dont think I suggested a number of planets as a comparison.


I know I was.
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:47 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Shadowman wrote:
It was an example. The Unknown Regions aren't all composed of copies of Aleraan either.


Examples are based on some verifiable facts.



I know I was.



Well I'll say this.

Based on what is undeniable canon, meaning whats seen in the SW films and not the books,comics and other sources, the Galactic empire was in power for about 20-25 years.

The Mirror Universes Terran empire ruled for over 150 years.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:10 pm

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
It was an example. The Unknown Regions aren't all composed of copies of Aleraan either.


Examples are based on some verifiable facts.


Uh, yeah, they are. Thanks for explaining that to me.

Just so we're on the same wavelength here, what I meant was some planets aren't worth taking, thus they wouldn't be counted in the number of planets the Empire has.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:

I know I was.



Well I'll say this.

Based on what is undeniable canon, meaning whats seen in the SW films and not the books,comics and other sources, the Galactic empire was in power for about 20-25 years.

The Mirror Universes Terran empire ruled for over 150 years.


And the Galactic Empire never dissolved. By the time of the Yuuzhan Vong War, the Imperial Remnant still had thousands of planets under its control.

Still asking this, how many planet did the Terran Empire control?
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:26 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Shadowman wrote:Uh, yeah, they are. Thanks for explaining that to me.

Just so we're on the same wavelength here, what I meant was some planets aren't worth taking, thus they wouldn't be counted in the number of planets the Empire has.


Kool, the point I was trying to make is that we dont know how big the un-claimed areas are or if a bigger force is controling them.

And the Galactic Empire never dissolved. By the time of the Yuuzhan Vong War, the Imperial Remnant still had thousands of planets under its control.


Remember, I said "Based on what is undeniable canon, meaning whats seen in the SW films and not the books,comics and other sources"


The Yuuzhan Vong War was a series of books in which the story is set after "Return of the Jedi.There fore its status as canon is questionable.

Lucas him self likes to pick and chose what he will accept as solid canon, and changes his mind on a whim.

Return of the Jedi hevilly implies that the Empire fell at the end of the film.
Still asking this, how many planet did the Terran Empire control?


You didnt ask before.

Not counting colonies, about 120 worlds if I'm right.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:30 pm

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Kool, the point I was trying to make is that we dont know how big the un-claimed areas are or if a bigger force is controling them.

Uh, yeah, actually we do. (That map is incomplete, it doesn't and probably CAN'T list evert planet in the series)

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Remember, I said "Based on what is undeniable canon, meaning whats seen in the SW films and not the books,comics and other sources"


All right, well now I can immediately disregard everything you say on the matter. Expanded Universe ALWAYS comes into play in Star Wars discussions, you can't say "expanded universe doesn't count" in regards to anything Star Wars.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:The Yuuzhan Vong War was a series of books in which the story is set after "Return of the Jedi.There fore its status as canon is questionable.


No it isn't. It's canon until George Lucas says otherwise and he hasn't said otherwise.

It canon until contradicted by a higher form of canon. The books, I think, are the third tier, which is still pretty high up.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Not counting colonies, about 120 worlds if I'm right.


And I can say with absolute certainty that the Empire controlled many times that.
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:39 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Shadowman wrote:Uh, yeah, actually we do. (That map is incomplete, it doesn't and probably CAN'T list evert planet in the series)


kool, never saw that before.

Where is it from and how official is it?

All right, well now I can immediately disregard everything you say on the matter. Expanded Universe ALWAYS comes into play in Star Wars discussions, you can't say "expanded universe doesn't count" in regards to anything Star Wars.


The hell I cant.

Like I said, Lucas picks and choses what he will accept as solid, and he changes his mind when he wants.
No it isn't. It's canon until George Lucas says otherwise and he hasn't said otherwise.


I argue the opposite.

If it can be dropped at a whim theres no point in investing any value to it canon wise.

And I can say with absolute certainty that the Empire controlled many times that


For far less a time, as can be derived by solid canon materials.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 7014
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:01 am

Re: imperial navy vs star fleet

Postby Shadowman » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:04 am

Motto: "May God have mercy on my enemies, because I sure as hell won't."
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:The hell I cant.


True: You can't. Saves me a helluva lot of time, too. None of your points matter if you refuse to take the EU into consideration.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:For far less a time, as can be derived by solid canon materials.


The Empire formed 19BBY...and never actually ended, and they never had less than a thousand worlds in their grasp. And that was AFTER they lost the Galactic Civil War.
Sidekick= Saiya_Maximal
Steam Nickname: Big Chief Devil Hawk Fireball
Image
Shadowman's awesome site for cool people.
Shadowman's awesome comic for cool people.
"Falling is really just flying downward and out of control."
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
User avatar
Shadowman
God Of Transformers
Posts: 28917
News Credits: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 4:54 pm
Location: Look! A distraction!

Next

Return to Fantasy Battles

Transformers Podcast: Twincast / Podcast #103 - Road Trip
Twincast / Podcast #103:
"Road Trip"
MP3 · iTunes · RSS · View · Discuss · Ask
Posted: Sunday, October 19th, 2014