RAR wrote:Huge gaps is starting to annoy me especially since the legs on Weaponizer Optimus Prime that seem to be more gaps than legs to me sometimes. Devastator just reminded me how much I'm not a fan of that.
SillySpringer wrote:RAR wrote:Huge gaps is starting to annoy me especially since the legs on Weaponizer Optimus Prime that seem to be more gaps than legs to me sometimes. Devastator just reminded me how much I'm not a fan of that.
I don't care THAT much about the hollow, as long as it's not in a terrible spot. I'm still saving up for UW Devastator, I am at about $120.00 now!
LegendaryAntiHero wrote:SillySpringer wrote:RAR wrote:Huge gaps is starting to annoy me especially since the legs on Weaponizer Optimus Prime that seem to be more gaps than legs to me sometimes. Devastator just reminded me how much I'm not a fan of that.
I don't care THAT much about the hollow, as long as it's not in a terrible spot. I'm still saving up for UW Devastator, I am at about $120.00 now!
me neither. If I was worried about flaws like that, I wouldn't be collecting robotic action figures
joeprime276 wrote:I know I'm probably in the minority but I absolutely hate overly complex transformations. I think they should be as easy as possible as long as the two modes look good. I also hate back kibble.
phantom1592 wrote:I would settle for a Voyager?? Megatron.
Regardless Megatron and Optimus should be comparable size... and if they both ended up as torso bots I wouldn't shed a tear on that matter.
Still have a hard time understanding the rationale behind making Megatron a leader and Cyclonus a torso... I think part reuse went awry there...
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glarryg, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Omegatron., Razorbeast88, Sabrblade