Toy Fair 2016 - Transformers Titans Return Fort Max Emissary and Cerebros Official Images #HasbroToyFair #TFNY
Sunday, February 14th, 2016 12:43PM CST
Categories: Toy News, Event NewsPosted by: Va'al Views: 62,515
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Also, as fellow Seibertronian Cyberpath notifies us, the official Hasbro Transformers Facebook page has shared an image of the upcoming Leader class Soundwave - just chilling with some old tapes. Mirrored below for your viewing convenience, of course!
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by steals_your_goats on February 14th, 2016 @ 12:46pm CST
Lunatic Prime wrote:steals_your_goats wrote:Lunatic Prime wrote:steals_your_goats wrote:So since things have settled down a bit I think I'll post the most recent transmissions rumors.
1. There will be a Voyager Megatron and g2 laser prime released in 2017 that WILL NOT be part of titans return but WILL be headmasters. So this pretty much confirms that titans return will probably only be 4 waves long
2. There will be a new legends class bumblebee released and he will look similar to his devastation game model.
2. We already got one looking like that, but I could imagine a remold of Wheely.
Which one? The only recent legends class bee I can think of is the fall of Cybertron styled one.
That one is Deluxe Class.
The Classics Bumblebee http://www.seibertron.com/transformers-toys/gallery/classics/bumblebee/927/1/ and his repaints http://www.seibertron.com/transformers-toys/gallery/classics/bumblebee/1624/1/, http://www.seibertron.com/transformers-toys/gallery/reveal-the-shield/bumblebee/2278/1/ look like that game model from Devastation. They are also Deluxe class but I don't think it would be necessary to make another one in Legends class.
A remold of Wheely might be nice.
I was referring to this bee
I think bumblebee works in legends scale and since the one I mentioned is crap I think we could do with another try at a decent one.
Posted by DedicatedGhostArt on February 14th, 2016 @ 12:58pm CST
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 1:19pm CST
alex1986lunatic wrote:Lunatic Prime wrote:alex1986lunatic wrote:Chromedome is definitely a heavy retool of Deadend
Yeah, the arms and the back kibble (front of the car) are definitely the same (transformation). But the rest is very different, so really heavy retool. Or they just borrowed that transformation scheme like they did with CW Brawl's legs from Rook's.
The head/chest piece is also the same. As are the the crotch, thighs, knees and the panels closing around at the lower legs
However, this mold has separate feet.
I think the deluxes are the highlight of the line so far. The voyagers look a bit funny...Leaders are ok. Fort Max is spectacular due to its size. We'll see how it turns out in hand
For one, there's literally no identical parts shared between Dead End and Chromedome:william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:To clarify something from earlier, Chromedome is not a retool of the CW Dead End mold. He is his own unique mold but may have some similar engineering to the Dead End mold, much like how Energon Starscream was engineered similar to G2 Smokescreen.
What is your source? His arms and transformation (with the front end of the car on his back) really make it seem like he is based on the same design as Dead End. There was a decade between G2 smokescreen and energon Starscream while in this case, the Dead End mold is still being used for this year's releases.
There's also the notion that the Dead End mold cannot house a Titan Master figure within it no matter how much of its internals are gutted out to make room for it to fit, and which doing so would in turn eradicate a sizeable amount of the figure's robot mode structuring.
And Chromedome has flip-out feet that the Dead End mold doesn't have room for due to the way that mold transforms. That visible gap in each of Dead End's feet is for the figure's arms to go into in vehicle mode. Put some flip-out feet in those gaps and the arms have no more room to be properly tucked away in vehicle mode.
The most similarities the two molds have are similar altmode kibble protrusions on the shoulders (which themselves are shaped quite differently between the two molds), similar forward-positioned elbow joints, similar joints in general (which are found on many figures), and similar transformation schemes.
As for the G2 Smokescreen/Energon Starscream analogy, while Starscream came out in 2004, the Smokescreen mold was re-released circa 2003/2004 as RiD 2001 Smokejumper, and was again re-released in 2004 in Japan as RobotMasters Smokesniper. And their transformation would again be used for the Generations FOC Seeker mold in 2012-2014.
Posted by ZeroWolf on February 14th, 2016 @ 1:31pm CST
Also thanks for the info hellscreamer
Posted by Gunmetal on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:09pm CST
Looking at the two, there's just too many similarities for Chromedome to have not started from Dead End (or Streetwise), but probably not past the CAD stage. It looks like every singe piece is different, even the wheels and fists, to say nothing of the parts and joints needed for the new feet, canopy, and torso modifications.Sabrblade wrote:alex1986lunatic wrote:Lunatic Prime wrote:alex1986lunatic wrote:Chromedome is definitely a heavy retool of Deadend
Yeah, the arms and the back kibble (front of the car) are definitely the same (transformation). But the rest is very different, so really heavy retool. Or they just borrowed that transformation scheme like they did with CW Brawl's legs from Rook's.
The head/chest piece is also the same. As are the the crotch, thighs, knees and the panels closing around at the lower legs
However, this mold has separate feet.
I think the deluxes are the highlight of the line so far. The voyagers look a bit funny...Leaders are ok. Fort Max is spectacular due to its size. We'll see how it turns out in handFor one, there's literally no identical parts shared between Dead End and Chromedome:william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:To clarify something from earlier, Chromedome is not a retool of the CW Dead End mold. He is his own unique mold but may have some similar engineering to the Dead End mold, much like how Energon Starscream was engineered similar to G2 Smokescreen.
What is your source? His arms and transformation (with the front end of the car on his back) really make it seem like he is based on the same design as Dead End. There was a decade between G2 smokescreen and energon Starscream while in this case, the Dead End mold is still being used for this year's releases.
http://static.seibertron.com/images/toy ... tans19.jpg
http://static.seibertron.com/images/toy ... C%2016.jpg
http://www.seibertron.com/images/events ... n-012a.jpg
http://static.seibertron.com/images/toy ... tans22.jpg
http://static.seibertron.com/images/toy ... C%2017.jpg
http://www.seibertron.com/images/events ... n-047a.jpg
There's also the notion that the Dead End mold cannot house a Titan Master figure within it no matter how much of its internals are gutted out to make room for it to fit, and which doing so would in turn eradicate a sizeable amount of the figure's robot mode structuring.
And Chromedome has flip-out feet that the Dead End mold doesn't have room for due to the way that mold transforms. That visible gap in each of Dead End's feet is for the figure's arms to go into in vehicle mode. Put some flip-out feet in those gaps and the arms have no more room to be properly tucked away in vehicle mode.
The most similarities the two molds have are similar altmode kibble protrusions on the shoulders (which themselves are shaped quite differently between the two molds), similar forward-positioned elbow joints, similar joints in general (which are found on many figures), and similar transformation schemes.
As for the G2 Smokescreen/Energon Starscream analogy, while Starscream came out in 2004, the Smokescreen mold was re-released circa 2003/2004 as RiD 2001 Smokejumper, and was again re-released in 2004 in Japan as RobotMasters Smokesniper. And their transformation would again be used for the Generations FOC Seeker mold in 2012-2014.
Do we call this a retool? Do we come up with a new term (e.g. "total retool")? Is it all just semantics anyway? After all, from Springer/Sandstorm to now, we've seen a spectrum that throws the 3-step "New mold-retool-redeco" model out the window.
Whatever we call it, I'm not complaining. This process of engineering one guy into another absolutely fascinates me.
BTW, I have to ask, if you can take a combiner limb and make it a headmaster, what are the odds that you can use Mindwipe, Skullcruncher, and a potential Weirdwolf to design Cutthroat, Rippersnapper, and Sinnertwin?
Posted by Deathsaurus1 on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:12pm CST
Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Deathsaurus1 wrote:What size class is titan wars Galvatron?
I hope he's leader class.
Voyager
Really
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:20pm CST
Like I said, it's basically the same case that G2 Smokescreen, Energon Starscream, and FOC Starscream were. Different molds using similar engineering to get the same basic transformation across the board.Randomus wrote:Looking at the two, there's just too many similarities for Chromedome to have not started from Dead End (or Streetwise), but probably not past the CAD stage. It looks like every singe piece is different, even the wheels and fists, to say nothing of the parts and joints needed for the new feet, canopy, and torso modifications.
Do we call this a retool? Do we come up with a new term (e.g. "total retool")? Is it all just semantics anyway? After all, from Springer/Sandstorm to now, we've seen a spectrum that throws the 3-step "New mold-retool-redeco" model out the window.
Other cases like this would be:
- The G1 Bumblebee, G1 Cliffjumper, and G1 Bumper molds
- The G1 Runabout and G1 Runamuck molds
- The Alternators Smokescreen and Alternators Meister molds
- The Energon Sledge/Bonecrusher and Cybertron Hardtop molds
- The Prime Cyberverse Legion Knock Out and Prime Beast Hunters Cyberverse Legion Smokescreen molds
- The DOTM Deluxe Roadbuster and AOE Deluxe Lockdown molds
Posted by Lunatic Prime on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:21pm CST
Deathsaurus1 wrote:Decepticon Sunstorm wrote:Deathsaurus1 wrote:What size class is titan wars Galvatron?
I hope he's leader class.
Voyager
Really
Why did you hope he's Leader class? Did you want him to have a base mode or is it just the scale?
Posted by Stuartmaximus on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:26pm CST
Posted by Ultra Markus on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:30pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:Of course it is. But that doesn't make it the only important one.Ultra Markus wrote:sorry you guys feel that way but G1 is where it all began and is a big part of the franchiseFeeling tired or bored by something isn't the same thing as hating.Ultra Markus wrote:besides you G1 hatersSure, cuz those toys are all worth drooling over.Ultra Markus wrote:have robots in disguise and rescuebots to drool over
i never said they were the most important
you get tired of something long enough you will start to hate it
your liking the two new toy lines is your opinion and thats cool as long as kids buy into it
and make hasbro money thats fine with me
Posted by ZeroWolf on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:31pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:seems kinda half @$$ed! the toyfair! granted that we got a lot of goodies on display! but it could've been ever better had Alpha Trion, Astrotrain, Brainstorm ect been there!
All good things to those who wait
Posted by DedicatedGhostArt on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:31pm CST
ZeroWolf wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:seems kinda half @$$ed! the toyfair! granted that we got a lot of goodies on display! but it could've been ever better had Alpha Trion, Astrotrain, Brainstorm ect been there!
All good things to those who wait
Haha so true. At least we got Fort Max!!!
Posted by Ironhidensh on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:35pm CST
Posted by kurthy on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:51pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:Like I said, it's basically the same case that G2 Smokescreen, Energon Starscream, and FOC Starscream were. Different molds using similar engineering to get the same basic transformation across the board.Randomus wrote:Looking at the two, there's just too many similarities for Chromedome to have not started from Dead End (or Streetwise), but probably not past the CAD stage. It looks like every singe piece is different, even the wheels and fists, to say nothing of the parts and joints needed for the new feet, canopy, and torso modifications.
Do we call this a retool? Do we come up with a new term (e.g. "total retool")? Is it all just semantics anyway? After all, from Springer/Sandstorm to now, we've seen a spectrum that throws the 3-step "New mold-retool-redeco" model out the window.
Other cases like this would be:
- The G1 Bumblebee, G1 Cliffjumper, and G1 Bumper molds
- The G1 Runabout and G1 Runamuck molds,
- The Alternators Smokescreen and Alternators Meister molds
- The Energon Sledge/Bonecrusher and Cybertron Hardtop molds
- The Prime Cyberverse Legion Knock Out and Prime Beast Hunters Cyberverse Legion Smokescreen molds
- The DOTM Deluxe Roadbuster and AOE Deluxe Lockdown molds
I think you guys are trying to say the same. I think they use the exact same transformation scheme but only one or two parts are the same.
1. The knees to the waist are the same.
2. The combiner peg takes up a lot of space so having a hollow space there but having a solid connection between the shoulders would probably increase mold stability. The dead end mold is almost completely hollow from the stomach to the back/canopy.
3. The chromedome mold has the door panel stop at the wrist rather than halfway down the forearm. This means that the feet can take the space where the lower forearms would go.
4. With no more need for a combiner peg or a head, there is more than enough room for the master to fit in vehicle mode under the canopy.
By my count there are 17 shared parts (4 are wheels). Crotch, hips, knees, clavicles, and the parts connecting the front end to the back.
Posted by Autobot N on February 14th, 2016 @ 3:02pm CST
Posted by Deadput on February 14th, 2016 @ 3:40pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:seems kinda half @$$ed! the toyfair! granted that we got a lot of goodies on display! but it could've been ever better had Alpha Trion, Astrotrain, Brainstorm ect been there!
They gotta save the rest for later toy events in the year you know like how every other year has been.
Posted by VioMeTriX on February 14th, 2016 @ 4:29pm CST
Posted by william-james88 on February 14th, 2016 @ 4:57pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:seems kinda half @$$ed! the toyfair! granted that we got a lot of goodies on display! but it could've been ever better had Alpha Trion, Astrotrain, Brainstorm ect been there!
You need to keep some Q4 stuff for Botcon, especially with this being the last one.
Crosscheck wrote: I also love that Cerebros transforms into a tower like the G1 toy.
He does? Where was that shown at this toy fair, you have a pic of his tower mode?
Crosscheck wrote: It also looks like he interacts with the leader class figures to make an even bigger city mode. I should be able to have a pretty good sized Autobot City for Devastator to rampage through when this is all said and done.
We are still not sure of this. The box shows that the leader bases connect to his space ship mode, not his city mode:
Sabrblade wrote:For one, there's literally no identical parts shared between Dead End and Chromedome.william-james88 wrote:What is your source? His arms and transformation (with the front end of the car on his back) really make it seem like he is based on the same design as Dead End. There was a decade between G2 smokescreen and energon Starscream while in this case, the Dead End mold is still being used for this year's releases.
(snip)
The most similarities the two molds have are similar altmode kibble protrusions on the shoulders (which themselves are shaped quite differently between the two molds), similar forward-positioned elbow joints, similar joints in general (which are found on many figures), and similar transformation schemes.
Thats not a source that just your opinion based on what you qualify as a retool. Here's what I qualify as a retool, them using the same base mold, which they totally do. Everything about this toy is based on the same precise cuts and parts to make him work like Dead End. What kills me is that forearm design , with the same curvature and design with just a difference in mold detailing. But deep down it's the same shit. We'll have the proof when its in hand and we'll see everything is the same size and proportion (unlike every example you propose which is more inspiration/coincidence). This is the same shit as the one steps and Dark Crumplezone. Using different detailing on what is the same base mold, basing itself on the exact same design.
Transformers Cybertron Dark Crumplezone (Arm Bullet) Gallery
This, PMOP, Fort Max, Chromia, Dark Crumplezone, CW Streetwise and First Aid, its all retools to me. As far as I see it, they could have started from scratch to give Chromedome his own mold, but they based it all off Dead End's, to the exact angles of curvature for inner design.
Posted by Deadput on February 14th, 2016 @ 4:58pm CST
VioMeTriX wrote:the headmaster gimmick is neat and all, but it is funny as the actual head robots are exactly the same as the ones from the 80's. in this day and age I think we could've gotten a little more articulation.
Only thing I can think of that they could of done was make the legs separate and not combined.
These headmasters are smaller then the original ones from the 80's so less likely to get articulation.
Plus is you give them to much articulation your going to end up with a crappy head.
Posted by Emerje on February 14th, 2016 @ 4:58pm CST
william-james88 wrote:We are saying pretty much the same thing about the Fort Max sword, mainly that the version that comes with the sword will be limited in number compared to the version that doesnt come with the sowrd.
Nope, that's not what I'm saying at all. Going by the fact sheet, which has been accurate so far, the mass retail version that'll be available to everyone will come with the exclusive sword, whatever other version Hasbro makes, be it for SDCC or whatever, wont have the sword. Exclusive isn't the same as limited.
Of course we've seen a number of changes from "Titan Wars" to Toy Fair 2016 so they may have dropped that. No weapons at all except for on his knees would really suck.
BTW, I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Titans Return being bumped from a summer release to fall. With CW on its last wave I wonder how they intend to fill the gap? I know some people were expecting TR to start hitting shelves as early as April or May based on the summer release, but with fall it could be more like August. Most of the first wave of TR figures on display look to be finished with no hand painting so I guess it's just a matter of waiting for supply to build?
Stuartmaximus wrote:seems kinda half @$$ed! the toyfair! granted that we got a lot of goodies on display! but it could've been ever better had Alpha Trion, Astrotrain, Brainstorm ect been there!
Toy Fair is more about showing off concepts to other professionals in the industry and products that are basically ready for the shelves. It's completely closed to the public, the only outsiders allowed in are the media. Notice the lack of glass display cases? It's not about revealing fan favorite characters to get a big reaction, they save that for BotCon in the spring, SDCC in the summer, and NYCC in the fall. Therefore Toy Fair in recent years has been about showing things we knew for sure were in the works while the other conventions are for showing things we've only heard rumor of and some surprises.
Emerje
Posted by ZeroWolf on February 14th, 2016 @ 5:10pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:seems kinda half @$$ed! the toyfair! granted that we got a lot of goodies on display! but it could've been ever better had Alpha Trion, Astrotrain, Brainstorm ect been there!
You need to keep some Q4 stuff for Botcon, especially with this being the last one.Crosscheck wrote: I also love that Cerebros transforms into a tower like the G1 toy.
He does? Where was that shown at this toy fair, you have a pic of his tower mode?Crosscheck wrote: It also looks like he interacts with the leader class figures to make an even bigger city mode. I should be able to have a pretty good sized Autobot City for Devastator to rampage through when this is all said and done.
We are still not sure of this. The box shows that the leader bases connect to his space ship mode, not his city mode:Sabrblade wrote:For one, there's literally no identical parts shared between Dead End and Chromedome.william-james88 wrote:What is your source? His arms and transformation (with the front end of the car on his back) really make it seem like he is based on the same design as Dead End. There was a decade between G2 smokescreen and energon Starscream while in this case, the Dead End mold is still being used for this year's releases.
(snip)
The most similarities the two molds have are similar altmode kibble protrusions on the shoulders (which themselves are shaped quite differently between the two molds), similar forward-positioned elbow joints, similar joints in general (which are found on many figures), and similar transformation schemes.
Thats not a source that just your opinion based on what you qualify as a retool. Here's what I qualify as a retool, them using the same base mold, which they totally do. Everything about this toy is based on the same precise cuts and parts to make him work like Dead End. What kills me is that forearm design , with the same curvature and design with just a difference in mold detailing. But deep down it's the same SHIZZLESNIT. We'll have the proof when its in hand and we'll see everything is the same size and proportion (unlike every example you propose which is more inspiration/coincidence). This is the same SHIZZLESNIT as the one steps and Dark Crumplezone. Using different detailing on what is the same base mold, basing itself on the exact same design.
Transformers Cybertron Dark Crumplezone (Arm Bullet) Gallery
This, PMOP, Fort Max, Chromia, Dark Crumplezone, CW Streetwise and First Aid, its all retools to me. As far as I see it, they could have started from scratch to give Chromedome his own mold, but they based it all off Dead End's, to the exact angles of curvature for inner design.
Will, you can see cerebros in Tower mode in that picture of the back of fort maxs box, you can even see cerebros hands clearly.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on February 14th, 2016 @ 5:12pm CST
still dunno who this Shizzlesnit character is
maybe he's like Kremzeek
Posted by Emerje on February 14th, 2016 @ 5:14pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Crosscheck wrote: I also love that Cerebros transforms into a tower like the G1 toy.
He does? Where was that shown at this toy fair, you have a pic of his tower mode?
...And then...
william-james88 wrote:
...In the same post. Classic.
Also I don't think they mean the base modes literally connect to his ship mode, it was just a convenient way to show both modes on the box. There's really no way for them to interact and just above that image it even says "form Cybertron City" which makes connecting to the city mode make a lot more sense.
Emerje
Posted by steals_your_goats on February 14th, 2016 @ 5:14pm CST
Posted by Emerje on February 14th, 2016 @ 5:28pm CST
steals_your_goats wrote:The transmissions podcast source explicitly said that Chromedome is his own mold, he's not a retool. They share engineering but that's simply because there's only so many ways you can make a robot turn into a car. So no matter what your personal definition of a retool is it's irrelevant, he's a new mold.
Plus Hasbro has stated time and time again that it's easier to start from scratch than to remold an existing figure to that level. Many of the "extensive remolds" we've seen with new heads and parts were planned that way from the beginning (like Combiner Wars). In other instances they swap out a set of molds for a new set to get a new look while still using some existing parts (like TR MP Optimus Prime). But what they don't do is a take an existing mold and start adding and removing 100% of the parts to make something completely new, that's too expensive so they start from scratch using something existing as a blueprint to make the engineering quicker.
Emerje
Posted by william-james88 on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:31pm CST
VioMeTriX wrote:the headmaster gimmick is neat and all, but it is funny as the actual head robots are exactly the same as the ones from the 80's. in this day and age I think we could've gotten a little more articulation.
There is more articulation, the arms are balljointed like last year's Minimus Ambus.
Emerje wrote:william-james88 wrote:We are saying pretty much the same thing about the Fort Max sword, mainly that the version that comes with the sword will be limited in number compared to the version that doesnt come with the sowrd.
Nope, that's not what I'm saying at all. Going by the fact sheet, which has been accurate so far, the mass retail version that'll be available to everyone will come with the exclusive sword, whatever other version Hasbro makes, be it for SDCC or whatever, wont have the sword. Exclusive isn't the same as limited.
Of course we've seen a number of changes from "Titan Wars" to Toy Fair 2016 so they may have dropped that. No weapons at all except for on his knees would really suck.
BTW, I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Titans Return being bumped from a summer release to fall. With CW on its last wave I wonder how they intend to fill the gap? I know some people were expecting TR to start hitting shelves as early as April or May based on the summer release, but with fall it could be more like August. Most of the first wave of TR figures on display look to be finished with no hand painting so I guess it's just a matter of waiting for supply to build?
Oh, well then we are. I am sticking to my guns though. The pic you are referring to says that there are 9000 units of Fort max worldwide (with only 3000 in the states) and that is far too small for a retail release. So I am sticking to the theory that the sword will not be available at retail and will only come with an exclusive version of Fort max that will also be limited in release.
Also, since the reveal at New York last year, Hasbro always said fall 2016. But when Hasbro gives a date, its the date where they know people can find it in store and thus the date of saturation. Just like saying that the Bruticus wave is first quarter 2016. What they really mean by fall is 3rd quarter 2016, which is the equivalent of last year's Defensor wave. Nothing has changed from last year. We have 4 waves of Generations figures. One for each quarter. Like with Defensor, we will probably start having some TR in stores in the summer and saturation reached by the end of summer, leading into the fall. With the second wave of TR coming in Q4. Its the same as last year, just choose how you wish to space out the 4 waves and what you count and stay consistent and you'll get your answer.
Posted by william-james88 on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:35pm CST
Emerje wrote:
...In the same post. Classic.
No need to laugh at me. I am not accustomed the G1 Fort Max or these characters and their functions. I didnt know that was cerebros up there, thats pretty cool. it not being obvious to me means they did a good job integrating him well within the base.
I thank the community for having shown me where he was in the picture.
Posted by Cobotron on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:39pm CST
Posted by Hellscream9999 on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:41pm CST
william-james88 wrote:Emerje wrote:
...In the same post. Classic.
No need to laugh at me. I am not accustomed the G1 Fort Max or these characters and their functions. I didnt know that was cerebros up there, thats pretty cool. it not being obvious to me means they did a good job integrating him well within the base.
I thank the community for having shown me where he was in the pick.
On the original, cerebros turned into a different tower to help fill out the city mode.
Posted by DedicatedGhostArt on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:50pm CST
Posted by Stuartmaximus on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:54pm CST
SillySpringer wrote:OHHHHH so the Autobot base modes are compatible with Fort Max? Awesome!!!
well Blaster & Soundwave are! i dunno about Powermaster Prime?
Posted by DedicatedGhostArt on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:57pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:SillySpringer wrote:OHHHHH so the Autobot base modes are compatible with Fort Max? Awesome!!!
well Blaster & Soundwave are! i dunno about Powermaster Prime?
Hope so!
Posted by ZeroWolf on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:58pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:SillySpringer wrote:OHHHHH so the Autobot base modes are compatible with Fort Max? Awesome!!!
well Blaster & Soundwave are! i dunno about Powermaster Prime?
All leader class bases will be able to connect, wouldn't make sense to leave some out of the party
Posted by Stuartmaximus on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:59pm CST
Posted by Doctor McGrath on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:03pm CST
It does look like some of the 3rd party HM offerings may be able to work with these. That's pretty cool.
I wonder if Hasbro will release some version of Gasket & Grommet to go with Fort Max? An updated version of those two that combine would be really cool.
Also, #teamWill
Posted by Stuartmaximus on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:20pm CST
Doctor McGrath wrote:I'm assuming the G1 headmasters won't be compatible with these new versions? Did Hasbro happen to confirm or deny that?
It does look like some of the 3rd party HM offerings may be able to work with these. That's pretty cool.
I wonder if Hasbro will release some version of Gasket & Grommet to go with Fort Max? An updated version of those two that combine would be really cool.
Also, #teamWill
well i was half expecting a Scamper repaint as Cog! seeing as they're using the Metroplex mold for Fort Max
Posted by Collector Canine on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:39pm CST
Stuartmaximus wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:I'm assuming the G1 headmasters won't be compatible with these new versions? Did Hasbro happen to confirm or deny that?
It does look like some of the 3rd party HM offerings may be able to work with these. That's pretty cool.
I wonder if Hasbro will release some version of Gasket & Grommet to go with Fort Max? An updated version of those two that combine would be really cool.
Also, #teamWill
well i was half expecting a Scamper repaint as Cog! seeing as they're using the Metroplex mold for Fort Max
I think people need to shut up about Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex. I personally think it it's a similar case to Titans Return Cromedome, it's so different we can't exactly call it a remold. I own Generations Metrookex, and I can personally say for experience that Fortress Maximus Appears very different from Metroplex. It seem only part of the lower legs, the forearms, and the ramps on Fort Max's arms (which are on Metroplex's legs, BTW) are shared between the two of them. That's what makes me think it's same situation as Cromedome.
Posted by steals_your_goats on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:42pm CST
DigitalBrave3 wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:I'm assuming the G1 headmasters won't be compatible with these new versions? Did Hasbro happen to confirm or deny that?
It does look like some of the 3rd party HM offerings may be able to work with these. That's pretty cool.
I wonder if Hasbro will release some version of Gasket & Grommet to go with Fort Max? An updated version of those two that combine would be really cool.
Also, #teamWill
well i was half expecting a Scamper repaint as Cog! seeing as they're using the Metroplex mold for Fort Max
I think people need to shut up about Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex. I personally think it it's a similar case to Titans Return Cromedome, it's so different we can't exactly call it a remold. I own Generations Metrookex, and I can personally say for experience that Fortress Maximus Appears very different from Metroplex. It seem only part of the lower legs, the forearms, and the ramps are shared between the two of them. That's what makes me think it's same situation as Cromedome.
Not really the same thing. Fort max is undoubtedly a remold of Metroplex, there's no denying that. Chromedome simply shares engineering with Deadend and THAT'S IT. If anything needs to be dropped it's the Chromedome Deadend thing.
Posted by Collector Canine on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:47pm CST
steals_your_goats wrote:DigitalBrave3 wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:I'm assuming the G1 headmasters won't be compatible with these new versions? Did Hasbro happen to confirm or deny that?
It does look like some of the 3rd party HM offerings may be able to work with these. That's pretty cool.
I wonder if Hasbro will release some version of Gasket & Grommet to go with Fort Max? An updated version of those two that combine would be really cool.
Also, #teamWill
well i was half expecting a Scamper repaint as Cog! seeing as they're using the Metroplex mold for Fort Max
I think people need to shut up about Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex. I personally think it it's a similar case to Titans Return Cromedome, it's so different we can't exactly call it a remold. I own Generations Metrookex, and I can personally say for experience that Fortress Maximus Appears very different from Metroplex. It seem only part of the lower legs, the forearms, and the ramps are shared between the two of them. That's what makes me think it's same situation as Cromedome.
Not really the same thing. Fort max is undoubtedly a remold of Metroplex, there's no denying that. Chromedome simply shares engineering with Deadend and THAT'S IT. If anything needs to be dropped it's the Chromedome Deadend thing.
The Cromedome/Dead End thing is pretty stupid too. I agree with you on that, but I just personally don't think that Fortress Naximus is a retool of Metroplex. They're likely just similar figures that share a few parts. Hasbro has done that kinda thing before, I believe, so my theory is possible.
Posted by Doctor McGrath on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:50pm CST
Posted by Hellscream9999 on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:53pm CST
DigitalBrave3 wrote:steals_your_goats wrote:DigitalBrave3 wrote:Stuartmaximus wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:I'm assuming the G1 headmasters won't be compatible with these new versions? Did Hasbro happen to confirm or deny that?
It does look like some of the 3rd party HM offerings may be able to work with these. That's pretty cool.
I wonder if Hasbro will release some version of Gasket & Grommet to go with Fort Max? An updated version of those two that combine would be really cool.
Also, #teamWill
well i was half expecting a Scamper repaint as Cog! seeing as they're using the Metroplex mold for Fort Max
I think people need to shut up about Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex. I personally think it it's a similar case to Titans Return Cromedome, it's so different we can't exactly call it a remold. I own Generations Metrookex, and I can personally say for experience that Fortress Maximus Appears very different from Metroplex. It seem only part of the lower legs, the forearms, and the ramps are shared between the two of them. That's what makes me think it's same situation as Cromedome.
Not really the same thing. Fort max is undoubtedly a remold of Metroplex, there's no denying that. Chromedome simply shares engineering with Deadend and THAT'S IT. If anything needs to be dropped it's the Chromedome Deadend thing.
The Cromedome/Dead End thing is pretty stupid too. I agree with you on that, but I just personally don't think that Fortress Naximus is a retool of Metroplex. They're likely just similar figures that share a few parts. Hasbro has done that kinda thing before, I believe, so my theory is possible.
Pretty sure fort max is metro facing backwards
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:54pm CST
No they're not. Dead End's thighs look to be longer and have thigh swivels in the upper thigh closer to the waist, while Chromedome's thighs look to be shorter and have thigh swivels in the middle of the thighs closer to the knees. And their thighs are shaped differently.kurthy wrote:I think you guys are trying to say the same. I think they use the exact same transformation scheme but only one or two parts are the same.
1. The knees to the waist are the same.
But then that would the lower arms would have to be shorter, which would remove the inner space needed for the fists to rotate into the arms. Yet, Chromedome's fists do rotate into his arms, so the arms can't be Dead End's if Chromedome's arms can do what would prevent Dead End's fists from folding into the arms.kurthy wrote:3. The chromedome mold has the door panel stop at the wrist rather than halfway down the forearm. This means that the feet can take the space where the lower forearms would go.
The only similarity that those parts have between Dead End and Chromedome is that their wheels are wheels, their crotches are crotches, their knees are knees, etc. etc.kurthy wrote:By my count there are 17 shared parts (4 are wheels). Crotch, hips, knees, clavicles, and the parts connecting the front end to the back.
Will, I am not stating any opinion. I am stating what I see based on careful observations of the Chromedome photos, the Dead End figure I have on hand, and the comparisons I have made between the two, in which I can definitely say that, while the two share similar aesthetics and design elements, I see no base parts that are indentically sculpted between the two figure beyond some minuscule rudimentary components (namely joints) that are shared across many figures that Hasbro/TakaraTomy have developed. This is not my opinion, but it is my observation.william-james88 wrote:Thats not a source that just your opinion based on what you qualify as a retool.
Posted by Collector Canine on February 14th, 2016 @ 7:54pm CST
Doctor McGrath wrote:Also, remold isn't a derogatory term. Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex isn't a bad thing, it's a fact, that's all.
I never said it was a bad thing. I really like CW Dead End and his many retools, so Cromedome having similar engineering exites me. I just don't think Fortress Maximus is a retool of Metroplex.
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:01pm CST
It is evident that Fort Max began as Metroplex's mold as a base, but was so extensively modified from that point to become so thoroughly, extensively different from Metroplex in the long run. For these kinds of figure, "reshell" might be the more apt term.DigitalBrave3 wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:Also, remold isn't a derogatory term. Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex isn't a bad thing, it's a fact, that's all.
I never said it was a bad thing. I really like CW Dead End and his many retools, so Cromedome having similar engineering exites me. I just don't think Fortress Maximus is a retool of Metroplex.
Posted by Doctor McGrath on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:02pm CST
DigitalBrave3 wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:Also, remold isn't a derogatory term. Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex isn't a bad thing, it's a fact, that's all.
I never said it was a bad thing. I really like CW Dead End and his many retools, so Cromedome having similar engineering exites me. I just don't think Fortress Maximus is a retool of Metroplex.
Well I was just going off your request for everyone to "shut up" about it. That's normally not associated with something positive.
Posted by Collector Canine on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:03pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:It is evident that Fort Max began as Metroplex's mold as a base, but was so extensively modified from that point to become so thoroughly, extensively different from Metroplex in the long run. For these kinds of figure, "reshell" might be the more apt term.DigitalBrave3 wrote:Doctor McGrath wrote:Also, remold isn't a derogatory term. Fort Max being a remold of Metroplex isn't a bad thing, it's a fact, that's all.
I never said it was a bad thing. I really like CW Dead End and his many retools, so Cromedome having similar engineering exites me. I just don't think Fortress Maximus is a retool of Metroplex.
That's what I was trying to say! Thank you, Saberblade.
Posted by steals_your_goats on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:04pm CST
Hellscream9999 wrote:Pretty sure fort max is metro facing backwards
That couldn't be further from the truth. The groin is the same but backwards, the forearms and feet are the same but the shoulders, shins and thighs are remolded and the torso is completely new
Posted by Collector Canine on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:07pm CST
steals_your_goats wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:Pretty sure fort max is metro facing backwards
That couldn't be further from the truth. The groin is the same but backwards, the forearms and feet are the same but the shoulders, shins and thighs are remolded and the torso is completely new
I own Metroplex, and I can totally confirm that Fort Max's crotch is Metroplex's crotch put on backwards.
Posted by ScottyP on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:13pm CST
Posted by Hellscream9999 on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:14pm CST
DigitalBrave3 wrote:steals_your_goats wrote:Hellscream9999 wrote:Pretty sure fort max is metro facing backwards
That couldn't be further from the truth. The groin is the same but backwards, the forearms and feet are the same but the shoulders, shins and thighs are remolded and the torso is completely new
I own Metroplex, and I can totally confirm that Fort Max's crotch is Metroplex's crotch put on backwards.
They even kept the pivot hinge the right arm is now attached to (formerly the left), which, by the way, doesn't even seem to serve a purpose for him now...
I can plainly see that it is significantly different now, but, lets not go and pull one over ourselves if he really is metro facing another direction