Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette

Transformers News: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette

Monday, July 14th, 2014 11:42AM CDT

Categories: Movie News, Media
Posted by: Dr Va'al   Views: 26,310

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

UK based cinema chain company Vue Cinemas have posted a brief featurette including producers from the Transformers: Age of Extinction movie talking about the RealD 3D technology used in the Michael Bay film, from Lorenzo DiBonaventura to Mark Vahradian to Ian Bryce. Check it out embedded below!

Credit(s): Vue Cinemas YouTube
Search Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Popular Transformers News

Most Recent Transformers News

Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590662)
Posted by Dagon on July 14th, 2014 @ 12:30pm CDT
cruizerdave wrote:

No, it just drives me nuts when people say things like, "you only hate those movies because it's cool."

Hey, if you like these things, fine. That’s your deal. But when someone says my opinion is based on trying to be cool, that’s ridiculous.


I think it usually results when people just cannot handle the idea that you don't like something that they like. It's kind of the last childish resort to argument. I agree with the 'if you like things, fine' argument all day though.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590664)
Posted by cruizerdave on July 14th, 2014 @ 12:41pm CDT
I guess it would be better if we were all to preface everything we said with an "in my opinion ..." but I figured that since this is the Internet, that's a given. So when I say, "these movies are terrible" I'm not saying they are objectively terrible, just in my opinion they are terrible. But don't say that it's not my opinion or imply that it's impossible to honestly not like these movies, because it is. Especially in a summer with X-Men DOFP, Captain America The Winter Soldier and the new Apes flick.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590667)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 14th, 2014 @ 12:49pm CDT
cruizerdave wrote:I guess it would be better if we were all to preface everything we said with an "in my opinion ..." but I figured that since this is the Internet, that's a given. So when I say, "these movies are terrible" I'm not saying they are objectively terrible, just in my opinion they are terrible. But don't say that it's not my opinion or imply that it's impossible to honestly not like these movies, because it is. Especially in a summer with X-Men DOFP, Captain America The Winter Soldier and the new Apes flick.


DOFP was stupid. All it did was reset the entire universe, and as soon as I heard that the movie had to do with time travel, I knew it would do exactly what it did. So, there was no surprise there. The entire movie was a cheap ass "reset" button.

Captain America was awesome, but it didn't have giant alien robots with personalities, whereas AOE did, which makes AOE better.

Haven't seen the Planet of the Apes movie, but I doubt that has giant alien robots, too.

You haven't even seen AOE, so why are you comparing it to all these other movies?
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590669)
Posted by dragons on July 14th, 2014 @ 12:54pm CDT
cruizerdave wrote:
VirusCarnage wrote:I personally think that people hate the TF movies because it's 'cool' to hate them and because critics like to crap on Michael Bay.


Then you personally have no idea what you're talking about.

I prefer my movies without plot points that include robot piss, dogs humping, weird racists robots, racist depictions of most black characters on screen, gay sex in bathroom stall jokes, humans that all act like they are cocaine all the time, and endless amounts of irrelevant plot threads and characters who have no bearing on the story.

These movies go beyond dumb. They are assaultively stupid. It's terrible news for people who like good movies that these continue to be successful. Of course in a world where people can't get enough of Kim and Kanye, I guess it shouldn't be surprising that people pay for this garbage.


Possibly a lot of people who like these don't over analyze them like everyone else does with plots, acting and all other crap those people let critics judge on plot who get paid to judge movies but for people who like these movies are fan of series or don't judge everyyyy little detail in movie and go see movie what they are meant to made for entertainment pourpuse use watch movie for action, adventure, excitement, scared, laughter. When was last time have most of you memebers saw movie for entertainment use and did not over anayalize every little aspect of a film watched it out of pure enjoyment to be scared, laughed, see great fights that is why people like them with bonus what other city's country's look like outside of the U.S.?

What I like with movies about my family sister, cousin, father they don't talk about acting sucks characters are bland they need be outgoing, plot holes all that other nonsense crap like to I movies with family for this they stuff as that was good movie action was good funny think they be sequel I liked ending they don't over anayalize act like paid critics If I knew someone who acts like paid critic after seeing movie give there opinion I won't go see it with them any more they fun out of movies which is entertainment, same with comics, music, anything
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590673)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 14th, 2014 @ 1:05pm CDT
dragons wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:
VirusCarnage wrote:I personally think that people hate the TF movies because it's 'cool' to hate them and because critics like to crap on Michael Bay.


Then you personally have no idea what you're talking about.

I prefer my movies without plot points that include robot piss, dogs humping, weird racists robots, racist depictions of most black characters on screen, gay sex in bathroom stall jokes, humans that all act like they are cocaine all the time, and endless amounts of irrelevant plot threads and characters who have no bearing on the story.

These movies go beyond dumb. They are assaultively stupid. It's terrible news for people who like good movies that these continue to be successful. Of course in a world where people can't get enough of Kim and Kanye, I guess it shouldn't be surprising that people pay for this garbage.


Possibly a lot of people who like these don't over analyze them like everyone else does with plots, acting and all other crap those people let critics judge on plot who get paid to judge movies but for people who like these movies are fan of series or don't judge everyyyy little detail in movie and go see movie what they are meant to made for entertainment pourpuse use watch movie for action, adventure, excitement, scared, laughter. When was last time have most of you memebers saw movie for entertainment use and did not over anayalize every little aspect of a film watched it out of pure enjoyment to be scared, laughed, see great fights that is why people like them with bonus what other city's country's look like outside of the U.S.?

What I like with movies about my family sister, cousin, father they don't talk about acting sucks characters are bland they need be outgoing, plot holes all that other nonsense crap like to I movies with family for this they stuff as that was good movie action was good funny think they be sequel I liked ending they don't over anayalize act like paid critics If I knew someone who acts like paid critic after seeing movie give there opinion I won't go see it with them any more they fun out of movies which is entertainment, same with comics, music, anything


I over analyze the hell out of these movies. And I enjoy them best when I do.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590687)
Posted by chuckdawg1999 on July 14th, 2014 @ 1:55pm CDT
Ya know people complain about the length but for what a movie ticket costs nowadays I expect a long film, two news reels, and a couple cartoons.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590693)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 14th, 2014 @ 2:11pm CDT
chuckdawg1999 wrote:Ya know people complain about the length but for what a movie ticket costs nowadays I expect a long film, two news reels, and a couple cartoons.


Exactly. I get pissed when I go see a movie and it's anything less than 2 hours and 30 minutes. It feels to me, like the movie was of no significance if its any shorter. Like it was just something to waste time and money.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590698)
Posted by cruizerdave on July 14th, 2014 @ 2:45pm CDT
dragons wrote:

1. plots, acting and all other crap
2. action, adventure, excitement, scared, laughter. When was last time have most of you memebers saw movie for entertainment use and did not over anayalize every little aspect of a film watched it out of pure enjoyment to be scared, laughed, see great fights that is why people like them with bonus what other city's country's look like outside of the U.S.?

3. What I like with movies about my family sister, cousin, father they don't talk about acting sucks characters are bland they need be outgoing, plot holes all that other nonsense crap

4. l that was good movie action was good funny think they be sequel I liked ending they don't over anayalize act like paid critics If I knew someone who acts like paid critic after seeing movie give there opinion I won't go see it with them any more they fun out of movies which is entertainment, same with comics, music, anything


1. So story, acting and all that other crap are unimportant. Good to know. Therefore the Star Wars prequels are incredible films by your judgement. Good to know.

2. Inception would fall apart if you "over-analysed" it. However, it was so much more intelligent than any Bayformers, it doesn't invite that level of criticism. Also, China's tourism division is suing the makers of this latest Transformers movie because it does an extremely terrible job in portraying what China looks like to the outside world.

3. These movies are not family movies. They are full of crude humor and dialogue. I don't let my kids watch them because they are so crude they skirt the PG-13 rating.

4. Punctuation is your friend. Perhaps if you learned how to competently use the English language, you'd understand why people feel the dialog in Bayformers is bad.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590699)
Posted by Autobot032 on July 14th, 2014 @ 2:47pm CDT
cruizerdave wrote:It's a sad day for movies.

I'm sorry, but Bay's films are terrible and appeal to the lowest common denominator.


This ^ is absolutely unnecessary and what started this whole mess.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... enominator

Read 1, especially 2 and then 3. Which you admit to in the following post here:

cruizerdave wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:It's a sad day for movies.

I'm sorry, but Bay's films are terrible and appeal to the lowest common denominator.

1. What does that even mean?
2. Who are the highest common denominators? People who don't like the movies?
3. What have you contributed to the world?


1. It means these movies are designed for idiots. It doesn't matter that the plots are nonsense, the robots aren't characters and the most of the humans are, for the most part, terrible characters. It doesn't matter because, look pretty ’plosions, special effects, over-saturated colors and hot girls!

2. People who forgo seeing Bayformers and go see the latest X-men again. I'm no movie snob, but I've had a distain for Bay since Armageddon.

3. Really? I post an opinion about a series of movies that opinions range from "cinematic excrement" on the low end to "it's just a dumb action movie, what do you expect?" on the high end, and you're calling me out to justify my existence? What am I supposed to do, give you a list of my charitable donations and hours spent volunteering in my community? Because I could do that if that's what you want.


You have no right to call the audience a bunch of idiots with no class. A lot of people who happen to like the movies are members of this board and you just stated something that was not only offensive, but a blanket statement. It's not only rude, it IS against the rules. You don't like the movies? That's fine. Critique them directly, do not drag people into it. You know better than to do something like this.

cruizerdave wrote:
VirusCarnage wrote:I personally think that people hate the TF movies because it's 'cool' to hate them and because critics like to crap on Michael Bay.


Then you personally have no idea what you're talking about.

I prefer my movies without plot points that include robot piss, dogs humping, weird racists robots, racist depictions of most black characters on screen, gay sex in bathroom stall jokes, humans that all act like they are cocaine all the time, and endless amounts of irrelevant plot threads and characters who have no bearing on the story.

These movies go beyond dumb. They are assaultively stupid. It's terrible news for people who like good movies that these continue to be successful. Of course in a world where people can't get enough of Kim and Kanye, I guess it shouldn't be surprising that people pay for this garbage.


And then there's this. You have no right to tell a person how or what to think. You are not to speak for them, either. If you want to ingratiate yourself with the people around here, you're not off to a good start. There's no need to be so new here and be so rude. You can get your point across without being offensive, so knock it off right now.

SlyTF1 wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:It's a sad day for movies.

I'm sorry, but Bay's films are terrible and appeal to the lowest common denominator.


Yes, that's why it's the highest grossing movie of the year. People always say the movies "appeal to the lowest common denominator." What does that even mean? It sounds like some tagline everyone who doesn't like these movies, who have no imagination whatsoever, spout to put down those who do like them. Who are the highest common denominators? People who don't like the movies? What have you contributed to the world?


Sly, stop feeding into things like this. It's not worth it and you could end up in trouble for stoking the fire. Sometimes it's better to just take a breather, ignore the person and move onto other aspects of the thread. Pretend he doesn't exist, or something. You have that capability.

SlyTF1 wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:
VirusCarnage wrote:I personally think that people hate the TF movies because it's 'cool' to hate them and because critics like to crap on Michael Bay.


Then you personally have no idea what you're talking about.

I prefer my movies without plot points that include robot piss, dogs humping, weird racists robots, racist depictions of most black characters on screen, gay sex in bathroom stall jokes, humans that all act like they are cocaine all the time, and endless amounts of irrelevant plot threads and characters who have no bearing on the story.

These movies go beyond dumb. They are assaultively stupid. It's terrible news for people who like good movies that these continue to be successful. Of course in a world where people can't get enough of Kim and Kanye, I guess it shouldn't be surprising that people pay for this garbage.


Good news; AOE has absolutely none of that. But I guess you'll still find a way to complain about it.

cruizerdave wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:It's a sad day for movies.

I'm sorry, but Bay's films are terrible and appeal to the lowest common denominator.

1. What does that even mean?
2. Who are the highest common denominators? People who don't like the movies?
3. What have you contributed to the world?


1. It means these movies are designed for idiots. It doesn't matter that the plots are nonsense, the robots aren't characters and the most of the humans are, for the most part, terrible characters. It doesn't matter because, look pretty ’plosions, special effects, over-saturated colors and hot girls!

2. People who forgo seeing Bayformers and go see the latest X-men again. I'm no movie snob, but I've had a distain for Bay since Armageddon.

3. Really? I post an opinion about a series of movies that opinions range from "cinematic excrement" on the low end to "it's just a dumb action movie, what do you expect?" on the high end, and you're calling me out to justify my existence? What am I supposed to do, give you a list of my charitable donations and hours spent volunteering in my community? Because I could do that if that's what you want.


In my experience, it's the idiots who don't like the movies. They just hop onto the bandwagon mentality and don't know how to think for themselves. And they aren't "dumb action movies." The people who say that are the idiots I mentioned before.


Sly! I don't want to see a post like this again. I realize cruizerdave started this, but there's no need for you to try and finish it. You should just leave well enough alone! You're no better when you say things like "it's the idiots who don't like the movies." you cannot say stuff like that! It's offensive and it's not true. Plenty of people do not like this and other movies and doesn't diminish their mental capacity in any way. Again, please don't feed into this.

cruizerdave wrote:
RhA wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:It's a sad day for movies.

I'm sorry, but Bay's films are terrible and appeal to the lowest common denominator.

1. What does that even mean?
2. Who are the highest common denominators? People who don't like the movies?
3. What have you contributed to the world?


1. It means these movies are designed for idiots. It doesn't matter that the plots are nonsense, the robots aren't characters and the most of the humans are, for the most part, terrible characters. It doesn't matter because, look pretty ’plosions, special effects, over-saturated colors and hot girls!

2. People who forgo seeing Bayformers and go see the latest X-men again. I'm no movie snob, but I've had a distain for Bay since Armageddon.

3. Really? I post an opinion about a series of movies that opinions range from "cinematic excrement" on the low end to "it's just a dumb action movie, what do you expect?" on the high end, and you're calling me out to justify my existence? What am I supposed to do, give you a list of my charitable donations and hours spent volunteering in my community? Because I could do that if that's what you want.


Well, you certainly did not get any more nice from watching all those high-end movies.

Would you care for a hug?



Ha, ha! Yes, thank you for the hug.

No, it just drives me nuts when people say things like, "you only hate those movies because it's cool."

Hey, if you like these things, fine. That’s your deal. But when someone says my opinion is based on trying to be cool, that’s ridiculous.


No, it apparently isn't, at least to you. You started this by attacking people for liking these films (and yes you did). Just because you can say something doesn't mean you should. Ever hear the saying "if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all"? You could've given your opinion of the film without saying a word about the people. You chose to do it, you chose to be problematic. That drives ME nuts. Don't do it again.

cruizerdave wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:1. Good news; AOE has absolutely none of that. But I guess you'll still find a way to complain about it.

2. In my experience, it's the idiots who don't like the movies. They just hop onto the bandwagon mentality and don't know how to think for themselves. And they aren't "dumb action movies." The people who say that are the idiots I mentioned before.


1. I was fooled into watching the third one based on the same claims. So I got gay sex in the bathroom stall gag instead.
Sorry, fool me once, shame on you, fool me three times, shame on me. I'm not falling for it this time.
2. Oh, I hated these movies long before it was cool. I was posting criticisms of them when I got my hands on a leaked copy of the first one's script months before it was released. People assured me that they "fixed all that" during shooting. Yet Bumblepee was still there.


You are more than welcome to hate the films and post criticisms of them. You are not allowed to call people idiots because their opinion differs from your's. You cannot personally attack people because they like something you don't. You're better than this, so don't do it any more. I won't try and sell you on the 4th film, your mind is already set, and that's fine, but I have to ask: If you haven't seen the film, why are you posting in this thread? You're welcome to, but I don't understand it.

If you had just wanted to post a negative review of the films as whole, that would've been fine. Why, oh why, did you have to cross the line and go after the people as well? (I'm not really looking for an answer, I already know, it's more of a rhetorical question than anything.)

SlyTF1 wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:1. Good news; AOE has absolutely none of that. But I guess you'll still find a way to complain about it.

2. In my experience, it's the idiots who don't like the movies. They just hop onto the bandwagon mentality and don't know how to think for themselves. And they aren't "dumb action movies." The people who say that are the idiots I mentioned before.


1. I was fooled into watching the third one based on the same claims. So I got gay sex in the bathroom stall gag instead.
Sorry, fool me once, shame on you, fool me three times, shame on me. I'm not falling for it this time.
2. Oh, I hated these movies long before it was cool. I was posting criticisms of them when I got my hands on a leaked copy of the first one's script months before it was released. People assured me that they "fixed all that" during shooting. Yet Bumblepee was still there.


I'm not trying to fool you. Just stating facts. I don't care if you believe me or not.


But you do care, Sly, otherwise you wouldn't have kept this going. STOP. IT.

Dagon wrote:
cruizerdave wrote:

No, it just drives me nuts when people say things like, "you only hate those movies because it's cool."

Hey, if you like these things, fine. That’s your deal. But when someone says my opinion is based on trying to be cool, that’s ridiculous.


I think it usually results when people just cannot handle the idea that you don't like something that they like. It's kind of the last childish resort to argument. I agree with the 'if you like things, fine' argument all day though.


Plenty of people can handle someone not liking what they like. They can't handle being called the lowest common denominator (aka classless idiots), especially when it's not true. There was no need for it, there was no rhyme or reason for it. That kind of behavior is not welcome here.

cruizerdave wrote:I guess it would be better if we were all to preface everything we said with an "in my opinion ..." but I figured that since this is the Internet, that's a given. So when I say, "these movies are terrible" I'm not saying they are objectively terrible, just in my opinion they are terrible. But don't say that it's not my opinion or imply that it's impossible to honestly not like these movies, because it is. Especially in a summer with X-Men DOFP, Captain America The Winter Soldier and the new Apes flick.


No, prefacing it with "in my opinion" would not have made it better. You still would've been offensive to people with your comments. You can say "these movies are terrible" and LEAVE IT AT THAT. You do not have to add things that offend people.

So, let me make it clear now that I've addressed all of the offending posts (and some that weren't offending, but pertained to the discussion at hand), cruizerdave: Do not willfully offend people "just because" again. You're more than welcome to voice your opinion, negative, positive or in between, but do it about a movie, a toy, whatever inanimate object you wish, just not people. It's not necessary, it's not polite, it's not welcome.

Sly: You know better than this, you've been told before in the past. You get too riled up over these movies and it brings out the worst in you. It's just some movies, it's not worth it. I understand why you were upset, I really do, but your responses were no better.

With that all said, any questions, bring them to PM. This part of the discussion is over and dead, now. No more derailing the thread with stuff like this, I mean it! From this point on, the conversation is going in another direction.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590700)
Posted by Burn on July 14th, 2014 @ 2:52pm CDT
cruizerdave wrote:1. It means these movies are designed for idiots.


For the record, just because you don't like something doesn't give you the right to come onto these forums and insult people who think differently from you.

A lot of people go to the movies for an escape from reality, to relax, to be entertained, that doesn't make them idiots.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590702)
Posted by Cthulhunicron on July 14th, 2014 @ 3:08pm CDT
cruizerdave wrote:
VirusCarnage wrote:I personally think that people hate the TF movies because it's 'cool' to hate them and because critics like to crap on Michael Bay.


Then you personally have no idea what you're talking about.

I prefer my movies without plot points that include robot piss, dogs humping, weird racists robots, racist depictions of most black characters on screen, gay sex in bathroom stall jokes, humans that all act like they are cocaine all the time, and endless amounts of irrelevant plot threads and characters who have no bearing on the story.

These movies go beyond dumb. They are assaultively stupid. It's terrible news for people who like good movies that these continue to be successful. Of course in a world where people can't get enough of Kim and Kanye, I guess it shouldn't be surprising that people pay for this garbage.


Well said!
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590708)
Posted by chivesbot20 on July 14th, 2014 @ 3:37pm CDT
I love the movies :grin: Its the reason im a fan. Critics will never change my mind and honestly shouldnt change a movie goers mind either. I love the robot action and these are my favorite movies of all time. The human stuff i think just develops the plot, and im not a fan for most of the human stuff, i am for the actual transformers. Ive cried for days :sad: :sad: because i am unable to see AOE for 1 more day, but it looks and sounds great :michaelbay: :BOT: :CON:
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590709)
Posted by Clunker on July 14th, 2014 @ 3:43pm CDT
I made a huge post earlier which I now think was tldr material lol overall I was just saying they complicated the movie by having to many aspects to cover but still spent to much on the human aspect.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590716)
Posted by chivesbot20 on July 14th, 2014 @ 4:14pm CDT
I get what Clunker said. The humans should be considered in the plot but there is a a lot more "importance" or "emphasis" on the humans. They should be considered as the least important or the less focused race or facion during the films. But remember whos involved and, not that its bad, but michael bay and hollywood friends. Any mover goer is gonna catch in the trailer most likely first Mark and second optimus.Sooooo.......ya
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590719)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 14th, 2014 @ 4:26pm CDT
I was just thinking, and I came up with a theory for the sequel. [spoiler]What if KSI, or whoever's behind the man made TFs now puts Attanger's body inside of Lockdown's body to sustain his life?[/spoiler] Just like they did with Silas and Breakdown in TFP.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590722)
Posted by Autobot032 on July 14th, 2014 @ 4:35pm CDT
SlyTF1 wrote:I was just thinking, and I came up with a theory for the sequel. [spoiler]What if KSI, or whoever's behind the man made TFs now puts Attanger's body inside of Lockdown's body to sustain his life?[/spoiler] Just like they did with Silas and Breakdown in TFP.


I think that would make a LOT of fans angry. It's made them mad enough that the film series has borrowed from past storylines as it already has, but something like that? A straight up ripoff? Oh, I think that'd get people upset.

Critics especially.

Plus with the damage sustained to both, I doubt you could make it work, really. In the scenario you're presenting, the source material had one of those two still alive, barely, but still alive.

Taking two dead and making one whole new life just doesn't seem feasible in this universe. Plus with all the talk of souls, etc, it just won't work. I get where you're coming from, though.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590727)
Posted by Sabrblade on July 14th, 2014 @ 4:46pm CDT
SlyTF1 wrote:I was just thinking, and I came up with a theory for the sequel. [spoiler]What if KSI, or whoever's behind the man made TFs now puts Attanger's body inside of Lockdown's body to sustain his life?[/spoiler] Just like they did with Silas and Breakdown in TFP.
That would be very unoriginal and uninspiring.

And like Autobot 032 said, it wouldn't make sense since both were already dead while Silas was still somewhat alive. KSI doesn't have the power to breathe life into lifelessness. They're not God.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590728)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 14th, 2014 @ 4:49pm CDT
Autobot032 wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:I was just thinking, and I came up with a theory for the sequel. [spoiler]What if KSI, or whoever's behind the man made TFs now puts Attanger's body inside of Lockdown's body to sustain his life?[/spoiler] Just like they did with Silas and Breakdown in TFP.


I think that would make a LOT of fans angry. It's made them mad enough that the film series has borrowed from past storylines as it already has, but something like that? A straight up ripoff? Oh, I think that'd get people upset.

Critics especially.

Plus with the damage sustained to both, I doubt you could make it work, really. In the scenario you're presenting, the source material had one of those two still alive, barely, but still alive.

Taking two dead and making one whole new life just doesn't seem feasible in this universe. Plus with all the talk of souls, etc, it just won't work. I get where you're coming from, though.


But, they could work a way where Attinger isn't dead. I mean, the movie didn't show a big gaping hole in his chest, but a bloody wound. What if he survived and is just comatose or something?
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590733)
Posted by Sabrblade on July 14th, 2014 @ 5:01pm CDT
SlyTF1 wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:I was just thinking, and I came up with a theory for the sequel. [spoiler]What if KSI, or whoever's behind the man made TFs now puts Attanger's body inside of Lockdown's body to sustain his life?[/spoiler] Just like they did with Silas and Breakdown in TFP.


I think that would make a LOT of fans angry. It's made them mad enough that the film series has borrowed from past storylines as it already has, but something like that? A straight up ripoff? Oh, I think that'd get people upset.

Critics especially.

Plus with the damage sustained to both, I doubt you could make it work, really. In the scenario you're presenting, the source material had one of those two still alive, barely, but still alive.

Taking two dead and making one whole new life just doesn't seem feasible in this universe. Plus with all the talk of souls, etc, it just won't work. I get where you're coming from, though.


But, they could work a way where Attinger isn't dead. I mean, the movie didn't show a big gaping hole in his chest, but a bloody wound. What if he survived and is just comatose or something?
How likely is it that an ordinary human would have survived a close range (not a pointblank range, but still very near) plasma blast fired from a TF-sized cannon wielded by a gunner shooting to kill?

You'd have to work in something like magic or divine powers to explain his not being dead.
Re: Transformers: Age of Extinction RealD 3D Featurette (1590735)
Posted by SlyTF1 on July 14th, 2014 @ 5:04pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:
Autobot032 wrote:
SlyTF1 wrote:I was just thinking, and I came up with a theory for the sequel. [spoiler]What if KSI, or whoever's behind the man made TFs now puts Attanger's body inside of Lockdown's body to sustain his life?[/spoiler] Just like they did with Silas and Breakdown in TFP.


I think that would make a LOT of fans angry. It's made them mad enough that the film series has borrowed from past storylines as it already has, but something like that? A straight up ripoff? Oh, I think that'd get people upset.

Critics especially.

Plus with the damage sustained to both, I doubt you could make it work, really. In the scenario you're presenting, the source material had one of those two still alive, barely, but still alive.

Taking two dead and making one whole new life just doesn't seem feasible in this universe. Plus with all the talk of souls, etc, it just won't work. I get where you're coming from, though.


But, they could work a way where Attinger isn't dead. I mean, the movie didn't show a big gaping hole in his chest, but a bloody wound. What if he survived and is just comatose or something?
How likely is it that an ordinary human would have survived a close range (not a pointblank range, but still very near) plasma blast fired from a TF-sized cannon wielded by a gunner shooting to kill?

You'd have to work in something like magic or divine powers to explain his not being dead.


The same guys who survived getting shot by Optimus earlier in the movie. It looked like the blast just hit in front of him, and like from a grenade, the shrapnel is what knocked him back and caused all those bloody spots on his chest. If they wanted to, I bet they could go with that. I'm not saying that's what happened, but the writers could spin it that way in the sequel.

Ending Soon On eBay

TRANSFORMERS G1 - 1985 HOIST - 100% COMPLETE - NICE SHAPE ! - Time Remaining: 6 days 2 hours 23 minutes 26 seconds
G2 Transformers YELLOW SCAVENGER MOC - Time Remaining: 5 days 5 hours 55 minutes 1 second
G1 Transformers Sharkticon Action Figure Army Alpha Quintesson Energon Megatron - Time Remaining: 13 days 11 hours 39 minutes 49 seconds
Transformers G1 Lot Vintage Astrotrain Triplechanger 100% Complete - Time Remaining: 6 days 3 hours 40 minutes 26 seconds
Swindle Transformers Fall of Cybertron - Time Remaining: 6 days 12 hours 25 minutes 34 seconds
AFA Transformers 2005 - Cybertron Deluxe - Hot Shot - AFA U90 NM+/MT - Time Remaining: 12 days 10 hours 12 minutes 54 seconds
OPTIMUS PRIME TRANSFORMERS AGE OF EXTINCTION FIRST EDITION LEADER CLASS NEW - Time Remaining: 6 days 23 hours 27 minutes 52 seconds
Takara TRANSFORMERS Beast Wars Cybertron C-19 TONBOT JETSTORM  **FACTORY SEALED - Time Remaining: 5 days 5 hours 3 minutes 52 seconds
Transformers Podcast: Twincast / Podcast #149 - Titans Arrive
Twincast / Podcast #149:
"Titans Arrive"
MP3 · iTunes · RSS · View · Discuss · Ask
Posted: Sunday, July 10th, 2016