Transformers Mosaic: "Relativity."
Monday, August 27th, 2012 3:18AM CDTCategory: Comic Book News
Posted by: El Duque Views: 13,324
These are some of those stories. This is:
It should be noted that while this project has been recognized by IDW Publishing and Hasbro, none of the works presented have been commissioned or solicited by either company. The stories are not official canon, except where noted. These stories are the result of Transformers enthusiasts taking the time out of their busy days to contribute to a universe they love. No one has been paid for the production of these stories.
Follow Transformers Mosaic on Deviant Art, Facebook & Twitter
Kyle & Zack Hudson
Josh van Reyk
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
VNCToys News - LCTC, FansProject CA-13 & Revolver, MP12G, Generations, Funko, & My Little Pony!Posted 23 hours ago
Posted by wolverinetodd on August 27th, 2012 @ 4:09am CDT
Posted by alldarker on August 27th, 2012 @ 8:02am CDT
Posted by BeastProwl on August 27th, 2012 @ 8:59am CDT
Not saying I could do better though.
Posted by Doubledealer93 on August 27th, 2012 @ 9:20am CDT
Posted by Asepticon on August 27th, 2012 @ 12:43pm CDT
Posted by RhA on August 27th, 2012 @ 1:05pm CDT
Posted by Bumblevivisector on August 27th, 2012 @ 1:10pm CDT
But I do love what they're going for, since in vintage G1 media, Blurr was usually just the Autobot who talked too fast, his super-speed-hero aspect only surfacing all too briefly in his commercial, and U.S. issue #66, the latter seeing Thunderwing hand his aft to him after a mere 4 panels or so.
Watching season 3 at age 7, I always thought that if the other Autobots could just get him to calm down for 2 minutes, he could win the whole war single-handedly, so I like the idea that Blurr himself might actually share my frustration.
Posted by Megatron Wolf on August 27th, 2012 @ 4:59pm CDT
Posted by Gundamu on August 27th, 2012 @ 5:06pm CDT
Posted by Valandar on August 27th, 2012 @ 5:45pm CDT
wolverinetodd wrote:"They complain about how long the war has ragged on." I think that should have only one "g" to read raged. Otherwise, good.
Not really - local vernacular, at least in my area, includes "ragged on" to refer to things that have lasted long enough to just feel like they're dragging. Basically just like "dragged on", but without the "D".
If it SHOULD be changed, "dragged" on would fit the mood and feel of the sentence better than "raged on"
Posted by First-Aid on August 27th, 2012 @ 6:39pm CDT