Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store











Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
you think theyre belittling us because theyre trying to protect themselves? the fact that theyre even making this devastator shows how much they appreciate us.Rated X wrote:It’s time for a new strategy that supports the fans instead of belittles them for showing anticipation.
SW's SilverHammer wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Looking forward to the toy show then. Still undecided so it will be down to a good look of the individual constructicons themselves that may win me over.
Then of course it will be waiting to see about the rumoured yellow exclusive SDCC set...Then takara's offering. How many releases of metroplex were there again?
4, two for conventions SDCC and Animation-Comic-Game Hong Kong, then 2 standard retail, hasbro and takara tomy
Sabrblade wrote:Before I proceed, I want to point out that the following is not aimed directly at yourself, Roadbuster, but at the general public of this thread.Roadbuster wrote:Least we can confirm it is more towards the classic Devastator than IDW,![]()
I see this "Classics vs. IDW" concern floating around enough to make me ask, aside from Prowl being a part of the equation, what exactly is the difference between a Classics-style and an IDW-style Devastator?
Prowl wasn't always a part of Devastator in IDW. That's only been a thing in recent years. Previously, IDW had Devastator formed by all six traditional Constructicons, as early as "All Hail Megatron #2" back in 2008.
I ask everyone who has been concerned about Devy being "more IDW than Classics", had Devy's new toy been designed to look like the following image (but with the iconic chest wings included), would it have been considered "too IDW" or "more like Classics"?
Rated X wrote:Let’s say someone answers your bounty this weekend. You already know Hasbro wouldn’t appreciate this site leaking the image. But you know your website’s fan base would appreciate it greatly. You would have a tough choice to make. Who takes preference? Hasbro’s business interests or your own? Assuming increased web traffic translates to increased profits; would you be willing to miss out on an opportunity to see Hasbro’s failed secrecy practices continue?
ZeroWolf wrote:SW's SilverHammer wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Looking forward to the toy show then. Still undecided so it will be down to a good look of the individual constructicons themselves that may win me over.
Then of course it will be waiting to see about the rumoured yellow exclusive SDCC set...Then takara's offering. How many releases of metroplex were there again?
4, two for conventions SDCC and Animation-Comic-Game Hong Kong, then 2 standard retail, hasbro and takara tomy
I see was the Hong Kong one a different redeco or was it the takara one? There is some interesting repaint potential here like a six builder colour scheme.
ZeroWolf wrote:SW's SilverHammer wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Looking forward to the toy show then. Still undecided so it will be down to a good look of the individual constructicons themselves that may win me over.
Then of course it will be waiting to see about the rumoured yellow exclusive SDCC set...Then takara's offering. How many releases of metroplex were there again?
4, two for conventions SDCC and Animation-Comic-Game Hong Kong, then 2 standard retail, hasbro and takara tomy
I see was the Hong Kong one a different redeco or was it the takara one?
Tsutsukakushi wrote:In defense of the Seibertron forum owner...
The Seibetron forum owner has already explained his actions for his bounty in a reply here.
He doesn't need to be put on trial and keep defending himself here by answering all of these questions defending his integrity.
The Seibertron owner is a fellow fan who has created this site because he loves the fans. he is not this big bad evil corporation leader.
Desslok2201 wrote:Tsutsukakushi wrote:In defense of the Seibertron forum owner...
The Seibetron forum owner has already explained his actions for his bounty in a reply here.
He doesn't need to be put on trial and keep defending himself here by answering all of these questions defending his integrity.
The Seibertron owner is a fellow fan who has created this site because he loves the fans. he is not this big bad evil corporation leader.
...which isn't evil, either
Rated X wrote:"Too IDW" is everything TFC Hercules was before the upgrade parts came out. The ugly non-visor head, silly tread wrists, and the horrible green cement barrel.![]()
Im glad Hasbro didnt go that route.
Optimum Supreme wrote:Rated X wrote:"Too IDW" is everything TFC Hercules was before the upgrade parts came out. The ugly non-visor head, silly tread wrists, and the horrible green cement barrel.![]()
Im glad Hasbro didnt go that route.
Why do people get so up in arms at the notion of a green cement barrel? Why shouldn't it be green? I honestly don't care either way, it's a minor detail, but there's certainly nothing wrong with Mixmaster being colored the way he was 30 years ago.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Rated X wrote:Let’s say someone answers your bounty this weekend. You already know Hasbro wouldn’t appreciate this site leaking the image. But you know your website’s fan base would appreciate it greatly. You would have a tough choice to make. Who takes preference? Hasbro’s business interests or your own? Assuming increased web traffic translates to increased profits; would you be willing to miss out on an opportunity to see Hasbro’s failed secrecy practices continue?
So... what you're basically asking is: would he actually put his site on the line just for a few extra hits (which I must add would be rendered moot with the official reveal in just two weeks)? Hasbro can and will bite hard, you know?
I remember back in 2009/2010 we had a leaked image of Battle Ops Bumblebee on the site. Hasbro saw it and actually requested the image to be taken down. He complied and all was well. I'm pretty sure you remember the several of the Club leaks they had to keep under wraps as well. Same principle
Hasbro likes exposure like any other company, that we know. But sometimes the exposure has to be limited to a certain group, like stock holders, investors and retailers. I don't know the exact reasons, what I do know is that this Toy Fair is for them, not for us. Hasbro has the New York Toy Fair, SDCC and BotCon already for grand reveals to the public including the fans. Some fans may feel entitled to more, but a little modesty goes a long way.
Rated X wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Rated X wrote:Let’s say someone answers your bounty this weekend. You already know Hasbro wouldn’t appreciate this site leaking the image. But you know your website’s fan base would appreciate it greatly. You would have a tough choice to make. Who takes preference? Hasbro’s business interests or your own? Assuming increased web traffic translates to increased profits; would you be willing to miss out on an opportunity to see Hasbro’s failed secrecy practices continue?
So... what you're basically asking is: would he actually put his site on the line just for a few extra hits (which I must add would be rendered moot with the official reveal in just two weeks)? Hasbro can and will bite hard, you know?
I remember back in 2009/2010 we had a leaked image of Battle Ops Bumblebee on the site. Hasbro saw it and actually requested the image to be taken down. He complied and all was well. I'm pretty sure you remember the several of the Club leaks they had to keep under wraps as well. Same principle
Hasbro likes exposure like any other company, that we know. But sometimes the exposure has to be limited to a certain group, like stock holders, investors and retailers. I don't know the exact reasons, what I do know is that this Toy Fair is for them, not for us. Hasbro has the New York Toy Fair, SDCC and BotCon already for grand reveals to the public including the fans. Some fans may feel entitled to more, but a little modesty goes a long way.
I remember a few of those instances, but it was never really clarified if it was removed to be "on good terms" with Funpub/Hasbro or if it was removed out of fear of lawsuit. I can understand an exclusive image being a target. But if the image originated on Facebook, twitter, or Instagram, what case does Hasbro really have? It's like the paparazzi, you can’t sue them. You cant stop them. It's freedom of the press. It's just my personal opinion, but I say Hasbro would have no case in court. Maybe they can sue the guy who took the pic, but good luck in finding him.
Rated X wrote:Seibertron wrote:Rated X wrote:No hard feelings, but I liked the stance you first took better when you offered a bounty for clear pics. Just because the toy industry is a weird bunch of paranoid people, doesnt mean we need to support their weirdness. They really aint s**t without us fans who buy the product. If us fans were so unimportant, then they wouldnt have made a G1 Devastator. Us fans are the reason that toy exists. So its time for us fans to start being the puppeteers instead of the puppets. Getting those photos online was a great first step. We need more now, forget the 2 weeks. Just my opinion.
The "bounty" is still out there. I'd like to see pics as much as all of you. My stance hasn't changed. The only thing I've done since the original post is clarify that I don't want people doing things they're not supposed to be doing. I value my relationship with Hasbro and would like to maintain a good relationship with them because that is in all of our best interests.
Your mistrust in Hasbro and the corporate world is what really stands out in your above statement. They do an incredible amount of really cool things for us fans. Your comments come across as ungrateful or unappreciative. Maybe you don't have any need to feel those things, which is fine ... you don't have to. But your tone is harsh. It puts others on the defensive, which is what you may or may not intend.
Hasbro does an amazing job of doing this balancing act between doing things they think are going to make money (the most important thing here), making children, parents, fans, and collectors happy and obviously doing things that make investors or stock holders happy. It's a tough position to be in. Do they make all of those groups happy all of the time? Of course not, but I think they're certainly doing a great job of trying to find that perfect balance.
I understand what you’re saying. I just don’t agree with the whole “top secret” marketing strategy. It always fails so why even bother. Hasbro’s target audience is kids. Kids aren’t tuning in to toy fair updates online for the latest smuggled photos of a G1 Devastator character from 30 years ago. Kids are playing video games, watching TV or out playing sports or whatever. The only people glued to these updates is us 30 something G1 fans. So by Hasbro being all touchy about “unauthorized” reveals, they are taking a direct shot at us because we are the only ones who give a crap. As I said earlier, if Hasbro was worried about secrets so bad, they should stop sending TRU product information so many months early. All kinds of TF fans and scalpers work in TRU so the cat was let out the bag a long time ago. 2 weeks is a lot of time to someone who might have to make a financial decision based on a few pics. Some people want to sell their Hercules or Giant. Some people who hate the large size might now want to buy Hercules or Giant. Either way, I think the concept of secret reveals has failed. It’s time for a new strategy that supports the fans instead of belittles them for showing anticipation.
Let me pose an interesting question…
Let’s say someone answers your bounty this weekend. You already know Hasbro wouldn’t appreciate this site leaking the image. But you know your website’s fan base would appreciate it greatly. You would have a tough choice to make. Who takes preference? Hasbro’s business interests or your own? Assuming increased web traffic translates to increased profits; would you be willing to miss out on an opportunity to see Hasbro’s failed secrecy practices continue?
Roadbuster wrote:Personally, I'd like to know it it's going to have a retractable visor so fans can have their two-optics or visor Devastator.
Desslok2201 wrote:Tsutsukakushi wrote:Hasbro has the right to limit exposure of there products at toyfair. Toyfair is not for the fans, it's for the companies and the press.
Fans have the conventions that Hasbro sometimes shows up at and shows off newer products.
Please lets not turn this thread into a nasty free for all. With replies trying to fight the big corporation.
Hasbro probably has reasons why they limit fans from taking pictures and sharing info at the European toy fairs. those reasons could be as such.
1. Not to give competitors like Bandai, mattel and others more info than is needed.
2. Perhaps Hasbro gave exclusive pics and info rights to a magazine, paper, press, network, site or?
3. Hasbro might want to release all the info and pics publicly at a bigger event like the New York Toyfair.
4. The KO and 3rd party problem they have. Where Hasbro needs to reveal newer products as late as possible. So KO and 3rd party companies don't copy it and release it before HasTak does.
Please lets show some patience. The New York Toyfair is only Two weeks away.
Even if we don't see any reveals. It's not the end of the world. There are other things more important in life than lifeless plastic toys.
Numbers 1&4: Bingo.
Rated X wrote:I remember a few of those instances, but it was never really clarified if it was removed to be "on good terms" with Funpub/Hasbro or if it was removed out of fear of lawsuit. I can understand an exclusive image being a target. But if the image originated on Facebook, twitter, or Instagram, what case does Hasbro really have? It's like the paparazzi, you can’t sue them. You cant stop them. It's freedom of the press. It's just my personal opinion, but I say Hasbro would have no case in court. Maybe they can sue the guy who took the pic, but good luck in finding him.
Tsutsukakushi wrote:Don't get why this whole hating on HasTak and calling them the big bad corporation. needs to exist on a toy forum dedicated to Hasbro's toy products.
Agree with others, HasTak does more than other toy companies do. by attending all of these toyfairs in other countries with newer products they unveil. Going out of there way to please the fans by attending all of those conventions. Creating Two whole entire Transformers toy lines for the older fans called Masterpieces and Generations.
Seibertron wrote: Collecting Transformers is fun stuff!
My wife's making popcorn.
Burn wrote:Agamemnon wrote:Let's get back to talking about Burn's mammoth snout flopping...
Well I am Australian. It's kinda what we're known for.
william-james88 wrote:Tsutsukakushi wrote:Don't get why this whole hating on HasTak and calling them the big bad corporation. needs to exist on a toy forum dedicated to Hasbro's toy products.
Agree with others, HasTak does more than other toy companies do. by attending all of these toyfairs in other countries with newer products they unveil. Going out of there way to please the fans by attending all of those conventions. Creating Two whole entire Transformers toy lines for the older fans called Masterpieces and Generations.
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I was certain Takara was the one helming he masterpiece line. They are the ones who choose which toy is next and are in charge of design, right?
william-james88 wrote:Sorry to derail the thread, but isn't that exactly what the Alternity line was?
Metro Prime wrote:Rated X wrote:Seibertron wrote:Rated X wrote:No hard feelings, but I liked the stance you first took better when you offered a bounty for clear pics. Just because the toy industry is a weird bunch of paranoid people, doesnt mean we need to support their weirdness. They really aint s**t without us fans who buy the product. If us fans were so unimportant, then they wouldnt have made a G1 Devastator. Us fans are the reason that toy exists. So its time for us fans to start being the puppeteers instead of the puppets. Getting those photos online was a great first step. We need more now, forget the 2 weeks. Just my opinion.
The "bounty" is still out there. I'd like to see pics as much as all of you. My stance hasn't changed. The only thing I've done since the original post is clarify that I don't want people doing things they're not supposed to be doing. I value my relationship with Hasbro and would like to maintain a good relationship with them because that is in all of our best interests.
Your mistrust in Hasbro and the corporate world is what really stands out in your above statement. They do an incredible amount of really cool things for us fans. Your comments come across as ungrateful or unappreciative. Maybe you don't have any need to feel those things, which is fine ... you don't have to. But your tone is harsh. It puts others on the defensive, which is what you may or may not intend.
Hasbro does an amazing job of doing this balancing act between doing things they think are going to make money (the most important thing here), making children, parents, fans, and collectors happy and obviously doing things that make investors or stock holders happy. It's a tough position to be in. Do they make all of those groups happy all of the time? Of course not, but I think they're certainly doing a great job of trying to find that perfect balance.
I understand what you’re saying. I just don’t agree with the whole “top secret” marketing strategy. It always fails so why even bother. Hasbro’s target audience is kids. Kids aren’t tuning in to toy fair updates online for the latest smuggled photos of a G1 Devastator character from 30 years ago. Kids are playing video games, watching TV or out playing sports or whatever. The only people glued to these updates is us 30 something G1 fans. So by Hasbro being all touchy about “unauthorized” reveals, they are taking a direct shot at us because we are the only ones who give a crap. As I said earlier, if Hasbro was worried about secrets so bad, they should stop sending TRU product information so many months early. All kinds of TF fans and scalpers work in TRU so the cat was let out the bag a long time ago. 2 weeks is a lot of time to someone who might have to make a financial decision based on a few pics. Some people want to sell their Hercules or Giant. Some people who hate the large size might now want to buy Hercules or Giant. Either way, I think the concept of secret reveals has failed. It’s time for a new strategy that supports the fans instead of belittles them for showing anticipation.
Let me pose an interesting question…
Let’s say someone answers your bounty this weekend. You already know Hasbro wouldn’t appreciate this site leaking the image. But you know your website’s fan base would appreciate it greatly. You would have a tough choice to make. Who takes preference? Hasbro’s business interests or your own? Assuming increased web traffic translates to increased profits; would you be willing to miss out on an opportunity to see Hasbro’s failed secrecy practices continue?
It's not a marketing strategy because they haven't even started marketing it yet. Again, this is for retailers. The public reveal comes after stores are actually interested in the product. Plus, the strategy you asked for already exists. It's called BotCon, SDCC, and NY Toy Fair.
Seibertron wrote:Well, we're actually having family movie night watching Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014) for the first time
Emerje wrote:Seibertron not playing by Hasbro's rules would probably mean the death of Seibertron.
Emerje
Desslok2201 wrote:Seibertron wrote:Well, we're actually having family movie night watching Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2014) for the first time
I'm so sorry.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Insidious, MSN [Bot], Whifflefire, Yahoo [Bot]