-Kanrabat- wrote:Manager just don't want to deal with his hissy fit even though he's full of it. So he sell nim the Bee at that price to shut him up and went to the backstore to finish his bottle of jin.
Still not seeing how it's fraud. The manager could very well have told him no. He didn't. Therefore the transaction was legal.
There was nothing fraudulent about it.
The price was labelled on the shelf.
The price was correct in the computer.
The product was displayed above the wrong shelf pricing sticker.
Customer exercised his legal rights (which as we know varies across the world) and the Manager conceded and gave him the displayed price.
Where is the fraud?It's clear as day that it's fraud mixed with incompetence.
It's not incompetence. At the very least, it's laziness. (And not fraud)
"Purchase legally" is NOT an excuse.
I'm not using it as an excuse. I'm stating it. He purchased it, thus making the transaction legal.
Morally correct? That's open to an individual interpretation.
It's like going to a car retailer and force the seller to sell you a car for 1$ unless you expose some questionable stuff. He sell you a 20000$ car for 1$, you fill all the paperwork, and the contracts are 100% legally binding. But was it really legal? Hell no.
You said it yourself, all the paper work was done. That makes the transaction legal.
Now saying "force the seller" and "questionable stuff" is very broad. How was the seller forced? What was this questionable stuff? Was the buyer blackmailing the seller? That would then be illegal.
But that's not what happened in this case. You're making up scenarios which don't line up with this particular scenario.
You believe it's fraud, I don't. So let's leave it at that. We've both made our points very clear and there's no point harping on about it any further.