Counterpunch wrote:While being technically correct is often the best kind of correct, you should learn to apply a bit of tact to what you say. Further, if you were completely correct, then collectors, eBay, and the rest of the collecting fandom would use that naming. They don't.
I identified an error and corrected that error. Was it rude because I corrected the error without a fluffy ego-stroke or because I dared to point out a mistake at all?
And of course, fans never get it wrong, and an error never gets perpetuated as a myth. Because that would be absurd and incapable of occurring.
Don't believe me, fine. But you should actually check into it first before you categorically dismiss it, to prove me wrong.
Counterpunch wrote:Just as a reminder:
Deathsanras wrote:You might as well call Encore "World's Most Regular Sized Japanese Reissues".
A lot of work goes into the site resources. A lot of people put their valuable time into them. While constructive criticism is a contribution in of itself, your snip is not helpful.
I never said that the resources themselves were not appreciated, or that people's time was not valuable. But if you want to be the bastion of indispensable Transformers resources, you should be aiming to be as correct as you can. Errors happen, but you've exactly proven my point about using imaginary names by dismissing my correction based on, well, eBay, instead of actually looking into it. Correcting one label does not invalidate the work done on this array of galleries. Unless you choose to.