Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Ah, Kotaku explained it to me, as Kotaku is wont to do.
Good thing it wasn't SCOTUS who ruled on this, huh?
Tronus_Rex wrote:The point is, any internet provider, say Verizon or Charter, within the USA, can now block ANYTHING, they wish-no matter how wrong or arbitrary.
Tronus_Rex wrote:It does effect the whole world as 90-95% of websites originate within the USA.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
njb902 wrote:From what I understand the FCC could still end up in charge of this. All they have to do is designate Internet access the same way they do roads Ect.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:It does effect the whole world as 90-95% of websites originate within the USA.
More like 40%, tops. Probably far less.
Tronus_Rex wrote:Here is a passionate friend AlphaOmegaSin, another from my generation. Warning: he cusses like a sailor, but, myself, I do not consider cussing to be cursing, that depends on the context-d***it-haha!
Blast Cannon wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:Here is a passionate friend AlphaOmegaSin, another from my generation. Warning: he cusses like a sailor, but, myself, I do not consider cussing to be cursing, that depends on the context-d***it-haha!
That guy is trippin' balls. I can stand in front of a camera and let loose a load of swear words whilst pontificating the worst case scenario from the doldrums of my imagination too. He looks the type to be walking around with a sandwich board claiming 'The End Is Nigh'.
Loon.
Tronus_Rex wrote:His feelings are no longer "tin foil hat", they're being reported by respectable and trustworthy people. ****!
Tronus_Rex wrote:-it's even being talked about on US cable TV.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:His feelings are no longer "tin foil hat", they're being reported by respectable and trustworthy people. ****!
Everyone is reporting on the ruling, but all of the actual bad stuff hasn't happened yet. There's a big difference between "reporting" and "making up **** that might happen."Tronus_Rex wrote:-it's even being talked about on US cable TV.
Because everything on TV is infallibly true. In the history of television, no broadcast has ever contained lies or exaggerations of any kind.
njb902 wrote:Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:His feelings are no longer "tin foil hat", they're being reported by respectable and trustworthy people. ****!
Everyone is reporting on the ruling, but all of the actual bad stuff hasn't happened yet. There's a big difference between "reporting" and "making up **** that might happen."Tronus_Rex wrote:-it's even being talked about on US cable TV.
Because everything on TV is infallibly true. In the history of television, no broadcast has ever contained lies or exaggerations of any kind.
I'm still saying the government will nationalize Internet access. It will be treated like telephones, roads, and OTA TV.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:njb902 wrote:Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:His feelings are no longer "tin foil hat", they're being reported by respectable and trustworthy people. ****!
Everyone is reporting on the ruling, but all of the actual bad stuff hasn't happened yet. There's a big difference between "reporting" and "making up **** that might happen."Tronus_Rex wrote:-it's even being talked about on US cable TV.
Because everything on TV is infallibly true. In the history of television, no broadcast has ever contained lies or exaggerations of any kind.
I'm still saying the government will nationalize Internet access. It will be treated like telephones, roads, and OTA TV.
This entire thread is based on the news of the government trying and failing to do this.
Shadowman wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:His feelings are no longer "tin foil hat", they're being reported by respectable and trustworthy people. ****!
Everyone is reporting on the ruling, but all of the actual bad stuff hasn't happened yet. There's a big difference between "reporting" and "making up **** that might happen."
njb902 wrote:If you read the actual ruling the judge specifically left open for the FCC to claim the Internet as a "common carrier", which would grant equal access for all.
Tronus_Rex wrote:Even Fox News, [owned by a Saudi Prince in case you didn't know ], is reporting it.
Court ruling overturns Net Neutrality, threatens online access, experts warn
I think with facts and history, as well as understanding of human motivation. So go fact yourself
Rupert Murdoch is a Saudi prince?
Tronus_Rex wrote:Even Fox News, [owned by a Saudi Prince in case you didn't know ], is reporting it.
njb902 wrote:Rupert Murdoch is a Saudi prince?
njb902 wrote:I'm confused are you telling me I should go **** myself or to look up the "facts"?
Because I've actually read the ruling myself, looked up its precedence, and what powers the FCC 's actually has.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Tronus_Rex wrote:Rupert Murdoch is a Saudi prince?
Did I say Rupert Murdoch? No, I'm not talking about Murdoch. He founded Fox News but he's no longer in charge. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, however is. Talal owns a media conglomerate that controls Fox News.
The "go fact yourself" is meant to be a little mean but not a full F you. It's a wordplay meant to grab your attention. Don't take it as a full...er, rude, comment.
Just so you know, "fact yourself" is used by many people in a positive way, but is also used like I just did-haha! Don't take it the wrong way.
Remember also, I'm trying to be positive, but hearing dismissals of "crazy", or "made-up/BS" incenses me. It smacks of apathy, and a few other things. My ability to care, doesn't come from fear nor delusion, but because I'm aware. An educated consumer is what I am, at the very least.
Blast Cannon wrote:Tronus_Rex wrote:Rupert Murdoch is a Saudi prince?
Did I say Rupert Murdoch? No, I'm not talking about Murdoch. He founded Fox News but he's no longer in charge. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, however is. Talal owns a media conglomerate that controls Fox News.
The "go fact yourself" is meant to be a little mean but not a full F you. It's a wordplay meant to grab your attention. Don't take it as a full...er, rude, comment.
Just so you know, "fact yourself" is used by many people in a positive way, but is also used like I just did-haha! Don't take it the wrong way.
Remember also, I'm trying to be positive, but hearing dismissals of "crazy", or "made-up/BS" incenses me. It smacks of apathy, and a few other things. My ability to care, doesn't come from fear nor delusion, but because I'm aware. An educated consumer is what I am, at the very least.
Sorry but you're a complete loon.
The best part is that you post from a deluded 'enlightened' perspective that is entirely presumptious. You think that everybody else must be ignorant or stupid for not giving a flying yellow monkey **** about what you're jabbering on about, when in reality I just don't care because not one part of what you and your conspiracy theorist buddies are claiming will take place.
You're barking up the wrong tree. Take to the streets.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
njb902 wrote:Fox News is owned by 21st century fox. The Prince you are referring too is the 3rd largest voting stockholder, Rupert Murdoch being the largest.
Edit: Btw Shadowman Murdoch is a US citizen now(I know he was born in Australia) , and news Corp moved it's headquarters to NYC a few years ago. I didn't know that myself till I dug a little today.
Also did you guys know that a company can't own a TV station in the US if more than 25% of the company is foreign owned.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]