And nor do I. However, if someone posts something blatantly stupid, I fail to see how it's wrong to point that out. Has the franchise moved on? Of course. And there have been some fantastic developments. But I don't see why that means anyone should have to "let go" of what started it all, or pretend that it's no longer relevant.Sid Burn wrote:bait much? The G1 argument has been done to death, we all have warm feelings for G1, you dont HAVE to defend it with every post.
No, but then I never said that. So you're attacking a point I never made. Is your faith in what you think so weak you have to attack what I think via strawman arguments? And G1 is still a strong part of the TF line, whether we're talking toys or comics. Ultimately, what other toyline is still being reissued exactly as it was after 20 years?G1 was and is great but it could not have supported TF for 20+ years alone.
As with most fans, I look at each line as it comes out and like some parts, dislike others. Bottom line is, why do some people seem to think that embracing modern TFs means forgetting the past? And where is the cutoff point? Beast Wars is ten years old now, is it time people "got over" that?