This is where I stopped reading. Any reasons you may have to support this idea are invalid, in my opinion, thus a waste of time to read. Reason being, you're trying to force 1 form of media to conform to another. It just won't work. The G1 cartoon was a 22 minute toy commercial. It had very light, if any, story structure, and rarely did 1 facet of a story go from 1 episode to the next. I'm not counting 2-parters or 3-parters here. The comics, especially the Marvel comics after Simon Furman took it over, were a concise series of interlocking stories that carried through multi-issue arcs. Bob Budiansky did it well, but Furman did it better. The cartoon writers couldn't even sniff that kind of depth. Not necessarily because they didn't have the talent, but because how the structure of the media was set up. There is no way a comic story could be comprehensible if it was in the format of the cartoon. A page, even a panel, of a comic can project and communicate much more than a piece of a cartoon episode of the equal amount, whatever that is.1984forever wrote:Most Transformers would speak and act exactly as they did on the G1 cartoon
I managed to catch the word "Quintesson" as I scrolled down to the reply button. I knew where it was going.1984forever wrote:You stopped reading at the second paragraph but somehow you know what is contained in the third paragraph?
That's fine, it's your opinion. We both have ours and mine is different than yours.Secondly, the Quintesson origin is much more original than the "Primus is the name of my god!" origin. There are plenty of other franchises where a God or gods created living beings, Primus weakens the entire Transformers franchise by not only watering down it's originality, but muddying up the original origin story. I don't need my Transformers to have Gods, or Knights for that matter, to be able to relate to them.
yup. I realized this morning that "Naturally occurring gears and levers" is the original origin. But it was so terrible that Marvel had to retcon it. Too bad it doesn't make the Quintesson story the original origin by default.Rodimus Prime wrote:I managed to catch the word "Quintesson" as I scrolled down to the reply button. I knew where it was going.1984forever wrote:You stopped reading at the second paragraph but somehow you know what is contained in the third paragraph?That's fine, it's your opinion. We both have ours and mine is different than yours.Secondly, the Quintesson origin is much more original than the "Primus is the name of my god!" origin. There are plenty of other franchises where a God or gods created living beings, Primus weakens the entire Transformers franchise by not only watering down it's originality, but muddying up the original origin story. I don't need my Transformers to have Gods, or Knights for that matter, to be able to relate to them.
Yeah, that started it all. That's how they originally presented the story, but it was never specified that the Transformers evolved into that. But I don't think the revelation of Primus was necessarily a retcon. Later the story delved further into the Transformers' creation, revealing that Cybertron was actually a living body of Primus, and the Transformers race was born right out of that body.1984forever wrote:I realized this morning that "Naturally occurring gears and levers" is the original origin. But it was so terrible that Marvel had to retcon it. Too bad it doesn't make the Quintesson story the original origin by default.
G1 had too many characters for one book, or show. Putting old favorites in one title, and underused or unknown characters in the other would appeal to a wider range of fans. Because of the Transformers long function cycles, a younger Ultra Magnus would not be barred from the '84 title, and an older Cliffjumper could appear in the '86-'91 book for more character interaction. I also think that Beast Wars should have their own title set even further into the future (or past) instead of everything being mashed together.ScottyP wrote:Real talk, you have some awesome ideas in there. I especially like your idea for the "86-91" title or however it's best phrased. If done right, that could be a really interesting way to approach an alternate timeline and flesh out some of those G1 characters that got in too late for the cartoon's glory days or too early for the deeper Furman Marvel arcs.
Draemwave 2.0? Exactly! There is a lot of unused potential in those old tech specs for characters like Mirage.ZeroWolf wrote:Okay, so basically you want dreamwave 2.0 ? Also why, in your version of the comic, couldn't mirage just be how he was in the cartoon...like everything else you're suggesting. Also the autobots outnumbered the decepticons, after all good guys sell a lot better than baddies.
What you suggest wouldn't be for me, but I wouldn't stop other people from reading it, it could be a fun miniseries for idw, as long as it didn't take the spotlight away from their universe.
You would probably hate my ideas, as I'm not one to stick to the past, preferring to constantly strive for the future.
Oh and it turns out that there is precedence for gears occurring naturally in nature. As an insect actually has parts of its body shaped like gears to help it jump long distances. It's called the issus and it's a plant hopper insect. Google search the pictures, as they are quite spectacular.
ZeroWolf wrote:We get those stories because they are new unbroken ground. Taking characters new directions and allowing them to evolve.
I don't see why your ideas can exist side by side. Everyone gets what they want then
Dreamwave did a pretty good job of mashing together cartoon, toy and comic. I liked it.ZeroWolf wrote:This stories are what the writers wished to tell, just as these are the stories you wish to tell. Though these ones seem less cartoon and more marvel run.
Have there been blunders with idw of course, look at all hail megatron and how they worked combiner wars. But then again they haven't gone bankrupt so they have that in their favour
ZeroWolf wrote:I don't remember blot dying Last I saw him it was in the wind blade miniseries.
You have a point about death but I do prefer things where death means death but I'm just waiting for idw to announce the return of bumblebee
ZeroWolf wrote:I actually like what they are doing with optimus right now also which universe did they storm a decepticon fortress as I don't recall that in the g1 cartoon (which was standard Saturday morning fare) or the marvel comic.
Also a lot of fans on here are quite happy with idw efforts. Besides which it could always be worse.
misfire19d wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:I actually like what they are doing with optimus right now also which universe did they storm a decepticon fortress as I don't recall that in the g1 cartoon (which was standard Saturday morning fare) or the marvel comic.
Also a lot of fans on here are quite happy with idw efforts. Besides which it could always be worse.
Marvel TF #19. We'll have to disagree about Optimus. But, just to add a little perspective, My Little Pony is selling better than MTMTE.
I would embrace the new stuff if I felt it was better than what came before. There was a time when I thought that MTMTE were the best comics I had ever read, even though it didn't really feel like Transformers. After that I got my hands on a full set of Dreamwave G1 and hated MTMTE ever since. With the exception of the 1st story arc, I felt DW pretty much nailed it.ZeroWolf wrote:Some how I'm not surprised, as my little pony has taken on a new life in its current incarnation. Which by the by, is nothing like it's old self, which works against your argument of being closer to the past.
But that is something I have trouble understanding, why do some people want more of the same, why they want the past instead of moving forward, and embracing the new status quo.
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], CrillanK, durroth, Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Overcracker, Sabrblade, Yahoo [Bot]