Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Ironhidensh wrote:Maybe its time to change the title from Netfix shows to Disney Plus shows?
Burn wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Maybe its time to change the title from Netfix shows to Disney Plus shows?
how bout dat
SW's SilverHammer wrote:Eat my ass funpub.
Burn wrote:And this is for taking Nemesis Maximo seriously.
*high fives Silly in the face*
carytheone wrote:I can't be assed to do any better right now.
Nemesis Maximo wrote:Burn wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Maybe its time to change the title from Netfix shows to Disney Plus shows?
how bout dat
Are the Netflix shows on Disney+? Or does BURN just need to add D+ to the name of the thread?
Burn wrote:Nemesis Maximo wrote:Burn wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Maybe its time to change the title from Netfix shows to Disney Plus shows?
how bout dat
Are the Netflix shows on Disney+? Or does BURN just need to add D+ to the name of the thread?
Did you even look at the new title or did you just quote the old title?
SW's SilverHammer wrote:Eat my ass funpub.
Burn wrote:And this is for taking Nemesis Maximo seriously.
*high fives Silly in the face*
carytheone wrote:I can't be assed to do any better right now.
Burn wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:Maybe its time to change the title from Netfix shows to Disney Plus shows?
how bout dat
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Rodimus Prime wrote:That was Michael Keaton in the end. Does he play the Vulture character here as well? Or is it totally unrelated?
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Rodimus Prime wrote:Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know)
Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
No argument there, but the difference is that Blade has already been introduced in mainstream media. Morbius, as Burn said, has only been pushed in comics mainly, and I myself only know of him from his story in the 90s Spiderman cartoon, which was also used to introduce Blade.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
Rodimus Prime wrote:No argument there, but the difference is that Blade has already been introduced in mainstream media. Morbius, as Burn said, has only been pushed in comics mainly, and I myself only know of him from his story in the 90s Spiderman cartoon, which was also used to introduce Blade.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Burn wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
Blade is currently an Avenger and also a member of Strikeforce (Avenger off-shoot team) so even he's getting a bit of exposure at the moment. Also no doubt to build up interest in the character.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Blade already has a series of live action films, as well as a short-lived live TV series. Morbius doesn't. Yet. So if Blade gets another big-screen treatment, the character will already be more familiar to general moviegoers.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:No argument there, but the difference is that Blade has already been introduced in mainstream media. Morbius, as Burn said, has only been pushed in comics mainly, and I myself only know of him from his story in the 90s Spiderman cartoon, which was also used to introduce Blade.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
How is there any difference here?
Prior to the live action Blade films, The only main stream media that Blade appeared in was that very same cartoon, Both characters are pretty much getting the same treatment
Rodimus Prime wrote:Blade already has a series of live action films, as well as a short-lived live TV series. Morbius doesn't. Yet. So if Blade gets another big-screen treatment, the character will already be more familiar to general moviegoers.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:No argument there, but the difference is that Blade has already been introduced in mainstream media. Morbius, as Burn said, has only been pushed in comics mainly, and I myself only know of him from his story in the 90s Spiderman cartoon, which was also used to introduce Blade.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
How is there any difference here?
Prior to the live action Blade films, The only main stream media that Blade appeared in was that very same cartoon, Both characters are pretty much getting the same treatment
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
I'm not sure how much clearer I can make it. Blade already had a run in a series of live action movies starring Wesley Snipes, so therefore he's more well-known to general moviegoers. As far as the general audience is concerned, Morbius is a new(er) character. Those of us who followed Spider-man close know about him, but I guarantee you that if you stop 100 random people on the streets of a city and ask them about Blade and Morbius, a lot more of them will know about Blade. That's the difference. Notoriety, which might factor into a difference in box office. I'm stating this referring to the event that Blade might get another turn in the live action movies, this time as part of the Spider-man universe, and thus the MCU.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:Blade already has a series of live action films, as well as a short-lived live TV series. Morbius doesn't. Yet. So if Blade gets another big-screen treatment, the character will already be more familiar to general moviegoers.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:No argument there, but the difference is that Blade has already been introduced in mainstream media. Morbius, as Burn said, has only been pushed in comics mainly, and I myself only know of him from his story in the 90s Spiderman cartoon, which was also used to introduce Blade.sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:This was a surprise for me I didn't know anything about it before seeing this trailer. And Michael Morbius is such a minor character (as far as I know) it's surprising he gets his own movie. I wonder if this might be the lead-in to the MCU's reboot of Blade.
Blade was as much a “minor character” And then there’s the guardians of the galaxy
How is there any difference here?
Prior to the live action Blade films, The only main stream media that Blade appeared in was that very same cartoon, Both characters are pretty much getting the same treatment
So again, what’s the difference, they are both following the same steps
Maybe I misunderstood what you were originally trying to say
Registered users: --B--, Bing [Bot], EvasionModeBumblebee, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Squawk'n'talk, twicsyescigs