Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:On the topic of SHIELD, I'm starting to lose interest in the show again, I don't even know if they're out of their latest brake (WTF is wrong with them, why do they take so many damn brakes?). Also the whole excitement about them actually using an actual Marvel character for longer than a short cameo is waning. I mean, I was never really interested in Deathlock to begin with, only having known him from Maximum Carnage, and now I think the fact he's part of the show is just completely overblown.
I mean, he isn't a big deal in the comics, but now I'm supposed to care for the show because they included a character that uses his name and has a similar origin and look to him? And the reaction and joy I get from the internet about this just smells of desperation.
"OMG guys, after 13 episodes the show actually does what it promised and uses someone we've actually heard of! And he actually does a few things! This is gonna be awesome, finally the show is good!"
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:I hated Rhino in this, he's just comic relief, sure the comic version isn't exactly great, but damn this incarnation is the wrong kind of stupid.
His suit needs reworking though, he's based on the Ultimate version, then make his suite closer to that.
Electro was weird, his characterization of being this super obsessed nutjob was just od.
Electro could also rename himself as Dubstep-Man.
The movie felt like it was originally based solely around Electro but ha the Goblin and Rhino just tacked on after filming had begun. The entire Electro plot felt like it's own tight movie, with only a few overlapping moments between Gablin and Electro.
I kinda think that a large chunk of the Goblin plot was originally part of ASM1, but was removed, and then included here with a couple of alterations so that the planned climax could happen.
Burn wrote:So with expectations not high ... I walked in, and the walked out later one with one impression.
This was probably the best Spider-Man movie I've seen.
Cyber Bishop wrote:Burn wrote:So with expectations not high ... I walked in, and the walked out later one with one impression.
This was probably the best Spider-Man movie I've seen.
WOW... You are the first positive review I have read about this movie to be honest.
SlyTF1 wrote:Like I said, whoever gave the movie a bad review was either high, or paid off by Microsoft to **** all over a Sony movie.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Rodimus Prime wrote:It was a really good comic book movie. Definitely better than the 1st, and better than the previous trilogy. Spider-Man 2 may come close, but it's because Alfred Molina was so good as Doc Ock. Still the best villain to date in ANY Spider-Man movie. Andrew Garfield, however, has it all over Tobey Maguire, multiple times. Now I wonder who will step in as Mary-Jane in TASM3. Whoever it is, please let it be a naturally curvy redhead. Kirsten Dunst wasn't very believable.
SlyTF1 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:It was a really good comic book movie. Definitely better than the 1st, and better than the previous trilogy. Spider-Man 2 may come close, but it's because Alfred Molina was so good as Doc Ock. Still the best villain to date in ANY Spider-Man movie. Andrew Garfield, however, has it all over Tobey Maguire, multiple times. Now I wonder who will step in as Mary-Jane in TASM3. Whoever it is, please let it be a naturally curvy redhead. Kirsten Dunst wasn't very believable.
I hardly even remember anything Doc Ock did. All i remember is he wanted something called tridium so he could blow up new york. Venom in SM3 and the Green Goblin in TASM2 are my favorites. They were the only ones to kill off a major protagonist. The Lizard did too, but I really don't care about him at all.
And some woman is supposed to play Mary Jane, I don't know who the hell it is, though. She was supposed to be in TASM2, but the movie already had so much in it, they cut her parts out and are saving it for TASM3.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:It was a really good comic book movie. Definitely better than the 1st, and better than the previous trilogy. Spider-Man 2 may come close, but it's because Alfred Molina was so good as Doc Ock. Still the best villain to date in ANY Spider-Man movie. Andrew Garfield, however, has it all over Tobey Maguire, multiple times. Now I wonder who will step in as Mary-Jane in TASM3. Whoever it is, please let it be a naturally curvy redhead. Kirsten Dunst wasn't very believable.
I hardly even remember anything Doc Ock did. All i remember is he wanted something called tridium so he could blow up new york. Venom in SM3 and the Green Goblin in TASM2 are my favorites. They were the only ones to kill off a major protagonist. The Lizard did too, but I really don't care about him at all.
And some woman is supposed to play Mary Jane, I don't know who the hell it is, though. She was supposed to be in TASM2, but the movie already had so much in it, they cut her parts out and are saving it for TASM3.
Venom did f**k all other than disgrace the character he's based on.
SlyTF1 wrote:He's Venom. He doesn't need to do anything. His very presence is enough to make him the best thing in whatever he's in.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
SlyTF1 wrote:Dead Metal wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:It was a really good comic book movie. Definitely better than the 1st, and better than the previous trilogy. Spider-Man 2 may come close, but it's because Alfred Molina was so good as Doc Ock. Still the best villain to date in ANY Spider-Man movie. Andrew Garfield, however, has it all over Tobey Maguire, multiple times. Now I wonder who will step in as Mary-Jane in TASM3. Whoever it is, please let it be a naturally curvy redhead. Kirsten Dunst wasn't very believable.
I hardly even remember anything Doc Ock did. All i remember is he wanted something called tridium so he could blow up new york. Venom in SM3 and the Green Goblin in TASM2 are my favorites. They were the only ones to kill off a major protagonist. The Lizard did too, but I really don't care about him at all.
And some woman is supposed to play Mary Jane, I don't know who the hell it is, though. She was supposed to be in TASM2, but the movie already had so much in it, they cut her parts out and are saving it for TASM3.
Venom did f**k all other than disgrace the character he's based on.
He's Venom. He doesn't need to do anything. His very presence is enough to make him the best thing in whatever he's in.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:you make him suck more than a porn actor in a blow job film,
Burn wrote:Dead Metal wrote:you make him suck more than a porn actor in a blow job film,
Well in the ones I watch they're actresses, guess we know what sort of porn you watch now!
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Shadowman wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:He's Venom. He doesn't need to do anything. His very presence is enough to make him the best thing in whatever he's in.
That's really not how it works. If all the character does with their screentime is suck and die, then it doesn't matter how awesome the character is, it's a waste. Which is the main issue with Spider-Man 3, they tried to cram so much in there, no one really had a chance to shine.
If they had dropped Sandman entirely, spent the first half focusing on Black-suit Spidey vs. New Goblin, with Peter ditching the symbiote after nearly killing Harry halfway through, then the second half being Spidey vs. Venom, with all three coming together to fight in the finale? Would have been way better. Sandman was nearly useless, and Venom showing up only in the final act was both a detriment to the very character, as well as crowding an already over-crowded movie.
SlyTF1 wrote:Shadowman wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:He's Venom. He doesn't need to do anything. His very presence is enough to make him the best thing in whatever he's in.
That's really not how it works. If all the character does with their screentime is suck and die, then it doesn't matter how awesome the character is, it's a waste. Which is the main issue with Spider-Man 3, they tried to cram so much in there, no one really had a chance to shine.
If they had dropped Sandman entirely, spent the first half focusing on Black-suit Spidey vs. New Goblin, with Peter ditching the symbiote after nearly killing Harry halfway through, then the second half being Spidey vs. Venom, with all three coming together to fight in the finale? Would have been way better. Sandman was nearly useless, and Venom showing up only in the final act was both a detriment to the very character, as well as crowding an already over-crowded movie.
Venom killed Harry. That's more than what any of the other villains did.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Grahf_, Stormshot_Prime, Yahoo [Bot]