Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

Can someone tell me when Sentinel says: "The needs of many outweigh the needs of few" in Dark Of The Moon?
I am sure I heard it in the cinema, but I can't find it on my dvd copy.
I know it's silly, but please help me

It's around the scene when Sentinel grabs Megatron by the head and tells him that he works with him, but never for him. It's either right before or right after that. Haven't seen the movie in a month, can't be sure.

I hope they didn't remove that line, because it's one of my favorites, given its origin.

Rodimus Prime wrote:It's around the scene when Sentinel grabs Megatron by the head and tells him that he works with him, but never for him. It's either right before or right after that. Haven't seen the movie in a month, can't be sure.

I hope they didn't remove that line, because it's one of my favorites, given its origin.

Thanks!!
It's not exactly that scene, but just 25 minutes later, when Sentinel activates the bridge using the red pillar.
But thank you anyway, you really helped me!!!

Rodimus Prime wrote:It's around the scene when Sentinel grabs Megatron by the head and tells him that he works with him, but never for him. It's either right before or right after that. Haven't seen the movie in a month, can't be sure.

I hope they didn't remove that line, because it's one of my favorites, given its origin.

So, I take it your a fan of Caiaphas, the High Priest mentioned in the Gospel of John?

Or are you a fan of Aristotle?

It's right before the "No prisonors only trophies" scene.

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:It's around the scene when Sentinel grabs Megatron by the head and tells him that he works with him, but never for him. It's either right before or right after that. Haven't seen the movie in a month, can't be sure.

I hope they didn't remove that line, because it's one of my favorites, given its origin.

So, I take it your a fan of Caiaphas, the High Priest mentioned in the Gospel of John?

Or are you a fan of Aristotle?

I always thought it was Aristotle. I'm not a Bible-thumper so I wouldn't know if it was in there or not. And I really do like that line just for what it is. It just happened to be used in some dramatic on-screen situations. (Star Trek and Transformers)

Rodimus Prime wrote:

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:It's around the scene when Sentinel grabs Megatron by the head and tells him that he works with him, but never for him. It's either right before or right after that. Haven't seen the movie in a month, can't be sure.

I hope they didn't remove that line, because it's one of my favorites, given its origin.

So, I take it your a fan of Caiaphas, the High Priest mentioned in the Gospel of John?

Or are you a fan of Aristotle?

I always thought it was Aristotle. I'm not a Bible-thumper so I wouldn't know if it was in there or not. And I really do like that line just for what it is. It just happened to be used in some dramatic on-screen situations. (Star Trek and Transformers)

Yeah, I'm a big trekie, there is a similar line in the Gospel of John

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:
I always thought it was Aristotle. I'm not a Bible-thumper so I wouldn't know if it was in there or not. And I really do like that line just for what it is. It just happened to be used in some dramatic on-screen situations. (Star Trek and Transformers)

Yeah, I'm a big trekie, there is a similar line in the Gospel of John

Wrath of Khan and Generations are my 2 favorite Trek films.

I remember when the first film came out (or was it RotF?), there was a big deal made about the fact that Nimoy wasn't even asked to voice a character, even with his marital connection to Michael Bay. (They're bothers-in-law, right?) As much as I like Hugo Weaving's voice, DotM Megatron should have been voiced by either Nimoy or Frank Welker. The change could have been explained by the deterioration in Megatron's condition. But then who would have voiced Sentinel Prime? (Judd Nelson!)

Rodimus Prime wrote:

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:

Rodimus Prime wrote:
I always thought it was Aristotle. I'm not a Bible-thumper so I wouldn't know if it was in there or not. And I really do like that line just for what it is. It just happened to be used in some dramatic on-screen situations. (Star Trek and Transformers)

Yeah, I'm a big trekie, there is a similar line in the Gospel of John

Wrath of Khan and Generations are my 2 favorite Trek films.

I remember when the first film came out (or was it RotF?), there was a big deal made about the fact that Nimoy wasn't even asked to voice a character, even with his marital connection to Michael Bay. (They're bothers-in-law, right?) As much as I like Hugo Weaving's voice, DotM Megatron should have been voiced by either Nimoy or Frank Welker. The change could have been explained by the deterioration in Megatron's condition. But then who would have voiced Sentinel Prime? (Judd Nelson!)

Wrath of Khan is my fav TOS film
First Contact my fave TNG film.

If I'm right the relation is trew a marriage of his aunt.And I was pleased with Nimoy in the 3rd film

I think he did just fine, I just thought that it would have been a good homage to 1986 if he voiced an actual Decepticon leader instead of a turncoat Autobot.

Rodimus Prime wrote:I think he did just fine, I just thought that it would have been a good homage to 1986 if he voiced an actual Decepticon leader instead of a turncoat Autobot.

I see what your saying

Instead of Sentinal Prime they could have introduced Galvatron as a seperate entity from Megatron and had Nimoy voice Galvatron.

That might've been a good nod towards the '86 movie don't you think?

Yeah. Maybe an "evil twin" or something. He'd have to have some connection to Megatron...