-Kanrabat- wrote:TF-fan kev777 wrote:First-Aid wrote:Okay, did anyone else notice that we all get a wonderful shot of Starscreams crotch anytime he sits in that throne? That's unnerving. Couldn't they have put n extra flap in there? It's....weird.
Its kind of like Basic Instinct, but not in a good way...
Goddammit, now I can't unsee it.
dragons wrote:i found the casino royal boring but all i cought was then end when they play poker game mavrick movie playing poker made game morein teristing than the casino royal did felt like i was watchnig world poker tour i cant stand that show its mostly luck of the draw if you want in or out it takes no skill to play poker.
but ill go see the new 007 after casino royal feels to me the mvoie gets more action than just dull playing talking scenes
JazZeke wrote:Crap. Bond movies suck and I'm not gonna fork over nine bucks to see the trailer and then walk out. Guess I'm gonna have to wait to see it.
Cormaster628 wrote:JazZeke wrote:Crap. Bond movies suck and I'm not gonna fork over nine bucks to see the trailer and then walk out. Guess I'm gonna have to wait to see it.
Have you seen Casino Royale! That movie not only doesn't suck, its one of the BEST FREAKIN MOVIES EVER! i'm definitly seeing QOM first day it comes out, not for the Transformer trailer but for the bond movie too!
JazZeke wrote:Cormaster628 wrote:JazZeke wrote:Crap. Bond movies suck and I'm not gonna fork over nine bucks to see the trailer and then walk out. Guess I'm gonna have to wait to see it.
Have you seen Casino Royale! That movie not only doesn't suck, its one of the BEST FREAKIN MOVIES EVER! i'm definitly seeing QOM first day it comes out, not for the Transformer trailer but for the bond movie too!
I saw the beginning, and it was basically the same formula as all Bond movies: Silver sports cars, laser watches, slutty women and remorseless killing. Pass.
Chaoslock wrote:Sports car: only for a few minutes as cameo
Laser watches: Nope. It was missing a lot of high-tech gadgets, for the better of the movie.
Casino Royale put back James Bond movies on their original track, as written by Flemming. I hope Quantum will be as good as CR.
JazZeke wrote:Chaoslock wrote:Sports car: only for a few minutes as cameo
Laser watches: Nope. It was missing a lot of high-tech gadgets, for the better of the movie.
Casino Royale put back James Bond movies on their original track, as written by Flemming. I hope Quantum will be as good as CR.
IMO the gadgetry was the ONLY redeeming quality of the Bond movies. Otherwise it's just slutty women and remorseless killing, which appeals merely to the lowest common denominators of people. Total pass for me.
Masturbation jokes, slapstick comedy coudl be said to appeal to the lowest common denominator, forced battles, with gratuitous fighting, like the TF movie.
JazZeke wrote:Chaoslock wrote:Sports car: only for a few minutes as cameo
Laser watches: Nope. It was missing a lot of high-tech gadgets, for the better of the movie.
Casino Royale put back James Bond movies on their original track, as written by Flemming. I hope Quantum will be as good as CR.
IMO the gadgetry was the ONLY redeeming quality of the Bond movies. Otherwise it's just slutty women and remorseless killing, which appeals merely to the lowest common denominators of people. Total pass for me.
Keeperofthespark wrote:AS for this small argument you and JazZeke are having, who cares if he doesn't like Bond or Casino Royale? It's his opinion and he's given reasons why. There's no need to force yours on his. However I'd also take the time to rant on his "lowest common denominator" statement with Bond films.
JazZeke wrote:Keeperofthespark wrote:AS for this small argument you and JazZeke are having, who cares if he doesn't like Bond or Casino Royale? It's his opinion and he's given reasons why. There's no need to force yours on his. However I'd also take the time to rant on his "lowest common denominator" statement with Bond films.
Please don't misunderstand me. I said that remorseless killing and meaningless fornication are meant to appeal to the lowest common denominators of society. Admittedly I've seen only one Bond movie (a Peirce Brosnan one) all the way through and that was all it seemed to be about. If the other Bond movies are more than just that, then perhaps they aren't all that bad after all.
As a fellow Transformers fan and a fan of the 2007 movie I find that statement to be incredibly offensive on all accounts, perhaps the most offensive I've seen on this site. Statements like that actually make me feel mad to be a fan of this franchise as it not only insults people who liked it on this site but also my own family, which loved it, as well as good freinds of mine.
Alright, maybe I was a being a bit of a pratt there as well as being a fanboy of the first movie, but seriously out of all the statments I've read regarding the first movie that is very low to say man.
But if liking the first does make me apart of the lowest common denomnator, then so be it. I'd rather watch a movie like TF and be very entetrained by it and enjoy it than be bored with a title like The Godfather.
AS for this small argument you and JazZeke are having, who cares if he doesn't like Bond or Casino Royale? It's his opinion and he's given reasons why. There's no need to force yours on his. However I'd also take the time to rant on his "lowest common denominator" statement with Bond films.
tigertracks 24 wrote:Generalizations always get folks in trouble.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Omegatron.