jimsloth wrote:link to what he normally looks like anyone?
Well, this one isn't. It's the original and only new mold one. Too bad this idea was abandoned after 1986. Stupid repaint happy Hasbro .Asphalt wrote:I would be happy for a galvatron that wasn't just a repainted megatron.
Insane Galvatron wrote:Actually, they should all be the same length. The ones on the side do a good enough job sweeping back, but the front one goes straight up. It just look weird. In the toon, they all three swept back, giving the illusion of the sides being just as tall, if not taller. That's why I like this mode. It was either this, or bend the front one back and never being able to transform him again.
Tramp wrote:Insane Galvatron wrote:Actually, they should all be the same length. The ones on the side do a good enough job sweeping back, but the front one goes straight up. It just look weird. In the toon, they all three swept back, giving the illusion of the sides being just as tall, if not taller. That's why I like this mode. It was either this, or bend the front one back and never being able to transform him again.
Actually, the sides on the cartoon version are still smaller. The only real difference is that the cartoon version only had three points in robot mode, but had four points in cannon mode. the shape of the ?crown? changes shape during transformation which can?t be done with the toy. The points don?t really sweep back however. It may look that way, but they don?t. And, even in the cartoon, the front point is still higher than the sides. The only real differnce is that in robot mode, the csrtoon version doesn?t have a point in back, but on the toy he does, as does the cartoon version in cannon mode, for practical reasons.
Tramp wrote:Insane Galvatron wrote:Actually, they should all be the same length. The ones on the side do a good enough job sweeping back, but the front one goes straight up. It just look weird. In the toon, they all three swept back, giving the illusion of the sides being just as tall, if not taller. That's why I like this mode. It was either this, or bend the front one back and never being able to transform him again.
Actually, the sides on the cartoon version are still smaller. The only real difference is that the cartoon version only had three points in robot mode, but had four points in cannon mode. the shape of the ?crown? changes shape during transformation which can?t be done with the toy. The points don?t really sweep back however. It may look that way, but they don?t. And, even in the cartoon, the front point is still higher than the sides. The only real differnce is that in robot mode, the csrtoon version doesn?t have a point in back, but on the toy he does, as does the cartoon version in cannon mode, for practical reasons.
Insane Galvatron wrote:I disagree. Every screen cap I've looked at for Galvatron, the side spikes are about the same length. They just kinda wrap around his forehead and then curve up, whereas the front spike just curves up and back. True enough, the front one is sticks up higher that way. But it's not longer. I think the reason this seems to look more like the cartoon Galvatron is not because of the length of the spikes, but more the way they curve. The long ones being on the side have more of that wrap-around-then-curve-up thing going on. If the short ones were longer, thinner, and curved back, it'd be even more spot on. Though he wouldn't be able to transform that way.
Tramp wrote:Insane Galvatron wrote:I disagree. Every screen cap I've looked at for Galvatron, the side spikes are about the same length. They just kinda wrap around his forehead and then curve up, whereas the front spike just curves up and back. True enough, the front one is sticks up higher that way. But it's not longer. I think the reason this seems to look more like the cartoon Galvatron is not because of the length of the spikes, but more the way they curve. The long ones being on the side have more of that wrap-around-then-curve-up thing going on. If the short ones were longer, thinner, and curved back, it'd be even more spot on. Though he wouldn't be able to transform that way.
The only part you measure are where they actually rise up, not where they wrap around. That is where you are getting confused. the point in which they actually begin to extend upward is the actual prong, not where they connect to the front prong. The front prog is still longer when measured from base to tip compared to the side ones measured from base to tip (that being from whgere they actually begin to extend upward).
Take a look at this pic here?
Notice where the side prongs actually sepatrate from the helmet at the sides, and extend out and up. They are actually shorter than the front crest.
TM2 Dinobot wrote:I don't get it. What exactally did you do? Bend the top fins in? Why? He doesn't look right now.
Insane Galvatron wrote:I edited the top post with a new side-by-side pic so the difference will be more obvious.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, DeathReviews, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Nemesis Primal, triKlops