kirbenvost wrote:I'm pretty sure that back kibble is mistransformed. We've seen pictures with the side windows far more compact. I think he forgot to hinge the windows inward once more.
IMO he's still more complex than Grimlock.
kirbenvost wrote:I'm pretty sure that back kibble is mistransformed. We've seen pictures with the side windows far more compact. I think he forgot to hinge the windows inward once more.
but G1 Sideswipe's animation model had his windshield where it is on this toy.BeastProwl wrote:I wish you could rotate the backpack though, that would really complete the look.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:but G1 Sideswipe's animation model had his windshield where it is on this toy.BeastProwl wrote:I wish you could rotate the backpack though, that would really complete the look.
That's the whole point to the Masterpieces (or, one of them). To be as show-accurate to the cartoon models as humanly possible.BeastProwl wrote:Sabrblade wrote:but G1 Sideswipe's animation model had his windshield where it is on this toy.BeastProwl wrote:I wish you could rotate the backpack though, that would really complete the look.
...And? You don't need to follow a model to make a good toy.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:That's the whole point to the Masterpieces (or, one of them). To be as show-accurate to the cartoon models as humanly possible.BeastProwl wrote:Sabrblade wrote:but G1 Sideswipe's animation model had his windshield where it is on this toy.BeastProwl wrote:I wish you could rotate the backpack though, that would really complete the look.
...And? You don't need to follow a model to make a good toy.
Who? Me or BP?Stormrider wrote:Sabrblade wrote:That's the whole point to the Masterpieces (or, one of them). To be as show-accurate to the cartoon models as humanly possible.BeastProwl wrote:Sabrblade wrote:but G1 Sideswipe's animation model had his windshield where it is on this toy.BeastProwl wrote:I wish you could rotate the backpack though, that would really complete the look.
...And? You don't need to follow a model to make a good toy.
So you want the windshield backpack upside down?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:Wish there were some size comparison pics with a Voyager toy of some kind.
metaphorge wrote:Sabrblade wrote:(I don't know how this compares to the relative size and proportions of the Countach to the Diablo).
TimothyR wrote:Forget Prime and Generations..
I WANT MORE MASTERPIECE FIGURES!!
i absolutely LOVE that they're scaling these things properly.. and i LOVE the scale they chose.
it's SOOOO exciting that not only are we getting sideswipe and red alert.. but we're getting SOUNDWAVE too.. and all at around the same time!!
Va'al wrote:I keep track of everyone. Backwards.
There are atandarfs to maintain.
LOST Cybertronian wrote:Hey, If Mindmaster survived then you should do just fine.
Stormrider wrote:kirbenvost wrote:I'm pretty sure that back kibble is mistransformed. We've seen pictures with the side windows far more compact. I think he forgot to hinge the windows inward once more.
IMO he's still more complex than Grimlock.
Yup, a few mistranformations. I'm not seeing the interior you're referencing. Which pic?
Sabrblade wrote:Who? Me or BP?Stormrider wrote:Sabrblade wrote:That's the whole point to the Masterpieces (or, one of them). To be as show-accurate to the cartoon models as humanly possible.BeastProwl wrote:Sabrblade wrote:but G1 Sideswipe's animation model had his windshield where it is on this toy.BeastProwl wrote:I wish you could rotate the backpack though, that would really complete the look.
...And? You don't need to follow a model to make a good toy.
So you want the windshield backpack upside down?
kirbenvost wrote:Stormrider wrote:kirbenvost wrote:I'm pretty sure that back kibble is mistransformed. We've seen pictures with the side windows far more compact. I think he forgot to hinge the windows inward once more.
IMO he's still more complex than Grimlock.
Yup, a few mistranformations. I'm not seeing the interior you're referencing. Which pic?
Front view of the car, you can see 'seats' through the window. I'm sure it's not much of an interior like the Alternators, more like the one on Rodimus, but it still looks somewhat like a car interior.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jelze Bunnycat, MSN [Bot], Overcracker, Roadbuster, Yahoo [Bot]