Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:31 pm
i cant wait
Seibertron.com - The Ultimate Transformers Fansite
https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/
https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=2280
well it IS STEPHEN FRICKEN SPIELBERG WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HEREi_amtrunks wrote:What a load of crap.
There is no way that a film tentatively rated "R" would be bumped down to a "PG" because an Executive Producer "put it in context"
If films like Harry Potter couldnt get an "M" rating bumped down to a "PG" then theres no way this could happen.
Also I thought the film wasnt finished, so how could the MPAA see it? If the MPAA is like their British and Australian counterparts, they would not be bale to rate a film until they see the finalised version that is to be released.
Autobot032 wrote:I'd surely hope it wasn't even close to a "R" rating.
I also hope that there is no F-word type language.
This is TransFormers, not Alien(s), and it shouldn't be.
It's not meant to be graphic, gory, over the top.
It's supposed to be entertaining, and fun. If your idea of those two involves heavy amounts of sex, foul language, and extreme graphic violence, well boo hoo. He's not catering this to you, or anyone else. Deal with it.
"R" rated TFs....come on...get real.
i_amtrunks wrote:What a load of crap.
There is no way that a film tentatively rated "R" would be bumped down to a "PG" because an Executive Producer "put it in context"
If films like Harry Potter couldnt get an "M" rating bumped down to a "PG" then theres no way this could happen.
Also I thought the film wasnt finished, so how could the MPAA see it? If the MPAA is like their British and Australian counterparts, they would not be bale to rate a film until they see the finalised version that is to be released.
Gutsman Heavy wrote:That'll be an M for Australians then
I'm not familiar with "M". Where does that fall in terms of PG, PG-13, and R?