Tekka wrote:I adore Death Note, and it amazed me that during the progress of the show my allegiances switched so easily. I can understand why you say some of it is inane, it isn't the most action oriented show and Light and L always seem to "just know" exactly what the other is going to do next without any deductive reasoning at all. The whole concept of the show however drew me in and I was hooked.
Originally I would have supported Kira to the bitter end, but as the show progresses and you see what a self centred, nasty piece of work Light actually is. My allegiance shifted toward L and his comrades almost instantly.
I won't post any spoilers but once a certain key death has occurred I really found the show harder to watch. I felt no affinty toward Near or Mello, and Light remained as un-admirable as always. But that didn't stop me from thinking L and Ryuuk were superb, they had to be the two main reasons I watched the show. That and I just had to see who would win in the end, and in truth despite my feelings... I was a little sad about the eventual outcome.
That's what bugged me. My own sense of morality begs for me to at least be empathetic of my adversaries. To at least see the pain I had caused and at least cringe. To see the families cut off, etc. Besides, conflict, enemies, are what make me strong. It irks me that Light just seems to think of everyone else as worms just because he has some damned book.
So if I've suddenly got a gun, I'm instantly better than someone without? No, it's just unsubstantiated power-- I did nothing to earn it, and I have no respect for what it is. Just write them away with no struggle, no conflict? That's not interesting, that's not heroics-- that's cowardice. He's the big bad guy who sits behind a desk, the fat pig that you play the whole video game through just to be able to kill. I really don't even like hearing from an individual like that. I need a protagonist I can respect.
And these aren't despicable people he's fighting against-- I wouldn't feel half as bad when he killed someone if he at least showed some emotion.
I personally don't get how he expects to build a 'perfect' world based on death. At least how he's going about it. The only way to even build a society is through some sort of collaboration. The book is an accessory at best. And why not assassinate dictators, world leaders? People that are actually going to count on a world scale. All this really is is a local game of cat and mouse. Frankly, I think the whole premise, the whole drive of the main character, is bogus.
EDIT: There's my vent. And onto the discussion of 'morality'...