Page 1 of 1

Canada's Quiet Contribution to the World Stage

PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:47 pm
by Ground Zero
Something I thought I'd pass along:

Sunday Telegraph Article

From today's UK wires: Salute to a brave and modest nation
Kevin Myers, The Sunday Telegraph

LONDON - Until the deaths last week of four Canadian soldiers accidentally killed by a U.S. warplane in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops were deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will now bury its dead, just as the rest of the world as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything
Canada ever does.

It seems that Canada's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored.

Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it
deserved.

Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire
British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by
downright neglect, its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British." The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000
Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone.

Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the
fourth-largest air force in the world.

The world thanked Canada with the same sublime
indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of course, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate
Canadian identity.

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.

Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers
in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.

Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular on-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia, in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no
international credit.

So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun.

It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This week, four more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.

Please pass this on or print it and give it to any of your friends or relatives who served in the Canadian Forces, it is a wonderful tribute to those who choose to serve their country and the world in our quiet Canadian way.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:03 am
by Rogue.
That's a good article, thanks for posting it. I almost hate to admit it, but there were times when I wondered if Canada had armed forces beyond the Mounted Police. That just shows how little we know and are taught about Canada in US schools :? A friend of mine that I've known for several years now is French-Canadian, so I get to hear a lot of discussion about things that most Americans just don't know of.

If this country keeps on its downhill slide, I'm probably going to move to Canada within the next 20 years or so...

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:24 am
by Archibald Witwicky
Err. I really don't mean to offend you. I'm a fan of Canada. I wanna visit. I think you guys are awesome and do a lot for the world.

But that article pretty much reads as 'Hey, we're Canada. A bunch of emo kids. Give us attention.'

But maybe I'm just too cynical.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:50 am
by Maximus Prime
Archibald Witwicky wrote:But that article pretty much reads as 'Hey, we're Canada. A bunch of emo kids. Give us attention.'

But maybe I'm just too cynical.


:evil: Yeah, maybe just a little.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:35 am
by Sharpwing
Every year on the 5th of May the Dutch nation remembers their liberation from the Germans during WOII.

Much of The Netherlands was liberated by the heroic First Canadian Army and I can assure you that we do remember and we (especially those who lived under the German occupation) are very thankful for their sacrifice.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:31 pm
by Archibald Witwicky
Maximus Prime wrote:
Archibald Witwicky wrote:But that article pretty much reads as 'Hey, we're Canada. A bunch of emo kids. Give us attention.'

But maybe I'm just too cynical.


:evil: Yeah, maybe just a little.


*Shrugs* sorry. I really do have a healthy dose of respect for Canada. I think it's a great country full of great people with great ideas.

The article just comes off as a really whiny cry for attention. Especially the wallflower metaphor. It's something I expect to see in the writing of a highschool kid with not enough friends.