The Energon Pub

What does anyone think?(chakra)

Naruto sucks.

I believe in Ki. It's weird, but I can actually "Move" it around me. It takes some force of will, and I can't actually DO anything with it, but it's there.

I really can't explain it.

I really don't know about ki. But, whenever one of my electronic devices doesn't work, I put all of my though and concentration into my right hand. If I point at it for a while it seems to start working fine.

I'd like to see what I can do if I can learn to use it at will...

im not talking of naruto im talking about indian chakra, rfeal NOT manga or anime

Well, what about it? Be specific with your question.

Salazaar wrote:I really don't know about ki. But, whenever one of my electronic devices doesn't work, I put all of my though and concentration into my right hand. If I point at it for a while it seems to start working fine.

I'd like to see what I can do if I can learn to use it at will...

That's actually what I'm trying to accomplish. I figure if I "Flex my Mental Muscle" enough, it'll make it stronger.

SuperiumPrime wrote:im not talking of naruto im talking about indian chakra, rfeal NOT manga or anime

There's a bunch of names for it. Chi, Ki, (pronouced "Key") life force.

And, as one could guess, there's a Wikipedia article for it.

I believe in Wikipediaism. The Wiki is almighty, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Praise thee.

Salazaar wrote:I believe in Wikipediaism. The Wiki is almighty, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Praise thee.

Wikipedia knows everything, and it's always there in a discussion.

Perhaps it's God Digitized?

Shadowman wrote:

Salazaar wrote:I believe in Wikipediaism. The Wiki is almighty, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Praise thee.

Wikipedia knows everything, and it's always there in a discussion.

Perhaps it's God Digitized?

are you alluding to the concept that Gods are defined by their beleiviers perception?

Tammuz wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Salazaar wrote:I believe in Wikipediaism. The Wiki is almighty, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Praise thee.

Wikipedia knows everything, and it's always there in a discussion.

Perhaps it's God Digitized?

are you alluding to the concept that Gods are defined by their beleiviers perception?

Perhaps God is in the Eye of the Beholder? His image depends on what you want His image to be.

a happy delusion, or the materealisation of an idea that helps people focus. You know, like when your baseball coach tells you to swing THROUGH the ball, not to stop when you hit the ball.

Shadowman wrote:

Tammuz wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Salazaar wrote:I believe in Wikipediaism. The Wiki is almighty, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Praise thee.

Wikipedia knows everything, and it's always there in a discussion.

Perhaps it's God Digitized?

are you alluding to the concept that Gods are defined by their beleiviers perception?

Perhaps God is in the Eye of the Beholder? His image depends on what you want His image to be.

Can God be a really tasty Italian sub-sandwich?

DesalationReborn wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Tammuz wrote:

Shadowman wrote:

Salazaar wrote:I believe in Wikipediaism. The Wiki is almighty, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Praise thee.

Wikipedia knows everything, and it's always there in a discussion.

Perhaps it's God Digitized?

are you alluding to the concept that Gods are defined by their beleiviers perception?

Perhaps God is in the Eye of the Beholder? His image depends on what you want His image to be.

Can God be a really tasty Italian sub-sandwich?

You're gonna eat god, aren't you?