Beast Wras Sourcebook #3 Comments and thoughts

Alright, so we have waited well over 6 weeks for this to be released, and we were told it would not feature as many errors or inconsistencies in it, as the editing would be far more stricter than the previous two books.
So what is your verdict?
Personally I think the first mistake IDW made was with the thinner cover, different textured and thinner pages. It's a step backwards, the pages can be hard to grip, and makes turning only a single page quite bothersome.
At least they got the 2 page spreads right this time, I prefer to get 2 pages devoted to Rattrap, Rhinox and Primal rather than some obscure minor character.
There are errors in this book, but what I like less than spelling errors is the way that many bio's seem to be dot points that were never filled out, and others seem like they came straight from the writers in draft form and were published that way.
Not a fan of some of the "newer" artist that submitted work for this book, the colours are good, but the overall character drawings are fairly ordinary.
Most of the Bio's are vague and not at all what I would call useful, so at least in that aspect Issue #3 remains in the same style as the first 2.
Add to that the most common weakness in this book seems to be depression, over and over again, and it still reeks of half baked writing.
If I did not already have the first three, I would not consider the last one.
So what is your verdict?
Personally I think the first mistake IDW made was with the thinner cover, different textured and thinner pages. It's a step backwards, the pages can be hard to grip, and makes turning only a single page quite bothersome.
At least they got the 2 page spreads right this time, I prefer to get 2 pages devoted to Rattrap, Rhinox and Primal rather than some obscure minor character.
There are errors in this book, but what I like less than spelling errors is the way that many bio's seem to be dot points that were never filled out, and others seem like they came straight from the writers in draft form and were published that way.
Not a fan of some of the "newer" artist that submitted work for this book, the colours are good, but the overall character drawings are fairly ordinary.
Most of the Bio's are vague and not at all what I would call useful, so at least in that aspect Issue #3 remains in the same style as the first 2.
Add to that the most common weakness in this book seems to be depression, over and over again, and it still reeks of half baked writing.
If I did not already have the first three, I would not consider the last one.