Saber Prime wrote:That's a telling of the story I actully haven't heard before.
I learned it back in college.And its not from the main stories about Herc' but from some of the stories told about his half brother from the same mother.
Saber Prime wrote:The fact he's called "God of Thunder" is why I tie him in with Jupiter/Zeus who are allso called that.
True bot were called that but for Zeus/Jupiter it was a fitting name.Both the Roman and Greek version of the god were loards of the sky and thunder because they controled the lighting and the thunder.
The oldest writtings call Thor the god of thunder for a completlly different reason that had nothing to do with thunder or lighting.
Saber Prime wrote:That's not true. Norse Mytholigy was the basis behind "The Mask" at least for the movies. Loki and Thor are brothers and the rivalry between them is just fighting for their father, Oden's attention and love. Thor's basically seen as the favorite son and Loki wants the same respect his brother gets. He doesn't get that respect because of his tricks, fooling around in the lives of Mortals.
It is true and if you read my post more carfully you would see and understand what I said.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Actually its part of every Thor myth origin story told.It was Loki that was responsible for the handle being short and in many ways the begining of the rivally between the two.
As you can see I did not say it was the
sol reason for the start of their rivalry but one of many.
And the fact is is is the reason why Thor started to distrust Loki.The hammer was forged and given to Thor when he and Loki were the equivalent of 8 to 10 years old and up untill that point most of Loki's tricks and schemes had gone un-noticed by Thor even when he was the sol target of those schemes.
The incident that resulted in the handle being shortened became known to Thor.
As for Loki seeking Odins love and attention thats debatable.There are many stories of Loki ploting to kill Oden and Thor from a early age.
As to why Thor was the favored son of Odin......Loki was adopted....at least in many of the early writtings.
Odin fought and killed Loki's father who was a frost giant from the kingdom of Jötunheimr [if I'm spelling that right

]After Odin killed the giant in battle he saw that the giants sone was left alone.
So he took the child as his own.Some of the other writtings suggest that Odin did so to ether keep a promise he mad his own father
Borr.Other writtings suggest that Odin took Loki as a way to ward off a curse placed on him be his father.
Saber Prime wrote:And I have seen versions of Thor with an exstended handle. Even versions of Marvel Comics Thor have longer handles than others allthough addmittedly none of them compair to the size of Ultra Magnus'.
Yes those versions of Marvel's Thor were from a short lived mini serries called
"Heroes Reborn".What preceeds the mini was that many of Marvels heroes were killed in battle fighting
Onslaught the spawn of Pro. Xavier and Magneto minds merged into one being.
Franklin Richards [the sone of Mr.Fantastic and the Inviable Woman] used his mutant powers to warp realtie and created a alternate world where the heroes that died [including the Fantastic Four] to be reborn.
In that Universe Thor carried a long handeled hammer.
Saber Prime wrote:The one thing you actully say I'm right on and even I'm not sure that's 100% right. That's just my own belief. I can't really prove it but I do belive based on the simularitys in the different storys and religions that they all can be traced back to the same origin.
Well like I said "in a way your right".Fact is with out trying to say that the stories are real or not most of our religions today were ether inspired or manipulated by the religions that were based on the myths surrounding the gods of old.
Or do you really think that Jesus was really born around Dec.25th????
Even thou it really isint addressed in the Bible reading the accounts of Marry's travel from Nazareth to Bethlehem it would seem that Jesus could not have been born in December.
This one line from the Gospel of Luke in particular has a givving clue to that
"And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night" December would have been an unusual for shepherds to be "abiding in the field" at this coldest time of year and the fields were unproductive.
The normal practice was to keep the flocks in the fields and from Spring to Autumn.
As for why we celebrate it on 12/25......there was a a Roman holiday around the same date.....on the supposed day of the winter solstice and day of rebirth of the Sunthe day was called Sol Invictus ("the Unconquered Sun").
The would decorate a tree and sing songs by it.
I also read somewhere that they would decorate the tree with painted heads of decapitated peasant children but I cant prove that right now so you'll have to truse me on that.