Sunstar wrote:You can say the same for the Autobots, unless you have concrete evidence that they are infact good, then you also won't win. I think in this case it's a draw.
The Decepticons and The Autobots may not survive in a mingled society. But the Decepticons are more like a different country with a different religious, moral, social and ethical beleif systems. With that said, it is immorral for any group to attempt to change the other group because they feel it is wrong. If a group decides to move into a country, ie a con joining bots, he or she must obide by their laws.
Good and evil solely depends on what side of the fence you stand on. very few people will see themselves as a bad guy. The Decepticons would not see themselves as the bad guys. They believe they are right and correct in their beliefs. They see the Autobots as the bad guys because they challenge their beliefs. And visa versa.
SO in essence the argument is no win. There is No right answer.
yes because invading and then enslaving others who don't agree with you can mean you're not a bad guy.
For christs sake, the autobots didn't try to kill humans or use them as weapons against the other faction. And when megatron was causing problems on Earth through his manipulations of corrupt officials (Mr. Berger), the autobots stopped disaster from happening.
I find it downright funny you're trying to argue my point against me by saying no side is right.
Slavery, invasions, mind control, and a total disregard for living things doesn't make you a good guy, that makes you a bad guy. All of these things the Decepticons have done, while the autobots have not.
I don't wish to point fingers here, but my guess is (because you seem to have a fascination with starscream), is that you could be biased for the decepticon side. however, thats not what this is about. This is about whether or not the Decepticons are really the bad guys, and unfortunately, they have alot of "bad" things going for them and to be honest little to no "good" qualities to them. When have they stopped gravity of cybertron from tearing apart the Earth? Never, and infact they were the ones who caused this. When did they prevent the opposing faction from turning everything organic into metal using an ancient relic? Never, again they were responsible for this problem.
this brings me to my next set of points:
-they attacked "civilians" on cybertron who had nothing to do with the war.
-they started the civil war on cybertron by forcing their "politics" and "laws" (or lack thereof) on all cybertronian inhabitants, basically enslaving or killing off those that did not agree with them.
-I have never once in any form of fiction seen a Decepticon try to make peace with the autobots, except for instances when both sides were threatened by something much more destructive than their war would ever be (unicron, the hate plague {when prime finally obliterated it}) Where as prime fought for the safety of human kind, even putting himself in harms way (as did other autobots in such situations.)
sure you could try to argue that the collateral damage from autobot's actions are not a positive thing, but the exact same could be said about the mayhem and damage the decepticons have done in the process. Seriously, the stunticons were basically made to destroy things, and to counter the Autobot's ground superiority. especially because almost 100% of that fighting is between an autobot and decepticon, so in that sense they are equally responsible for that damage, but go back to your dvds and watch what the scenarios were for that damage to happen, most of the time it has to do with decepticons stealing energy for making energon, or unfolding some plot to eradicate optimus prime and the others. Heres another thing, notice how so many of the weaponry and tech the autobots use are non-lethal. Such as Ironhide's ability with fluids, or Jazz's grapling hook and sonicbooms (caused from his speakers), I think a few of them even had weapons that were similar to emp's which disabled the con's weaponry and gadgets.
^^^ plus in the movie, how many autobots did you see die compared to how many decepticons actually died, rather than injured or disabled.
I'm sorry, but you're gonna have to come up with something to refute my claims if you truly want to turn my arguement into something that defends both sides as being good and bad.