Bonger wrote:Autobot032 wrote:Bonger wrote:No, I am not about to say anything negative about the Sonokong version and try not to make assumptions about my opinions or anyone else's. In the real world it is generally a trait found in less likable and generally ignorant people.
The Sonokong version is fine except for the sticker issue and their QC issues. However, it does command less money. Thats just how the cookie crumbles.
Oh. So you're going to flame and personally attack me for posting information that wasn't aimed directly at you? I see.
I didn't flame you, I didn't attack you. I simply stated that the negative ideas against Sonokong's items is basically ridiculous, considering they're the same toy. (which is true!)
Nowhere did I dig at you.
You say my actions are found in less likable and ignorant people, well you assumed about my post as well. So, where would you like me to hold the mirror for you? You could use it yourself.
Well, since I brought up Sonokong, and you in the next post made your comments and
quoted me, actually, I'd say they were directed aqt me.
Ofcourse as usual, you can't just be aman and apologize. Nothing new to see here folks....
I apologize when I'm wrong, all the time. I'm not sure what your problem with me is, but take it to PM so we can address this, before they close this thread down, or get either of us warned over a stupid couple of posts.
Before I end this here, here's a breakdown of my post so you can see what was what, and what wasn't:
Autobot032 wrote:Why would the Sonokong version command less money than the Takara version? Other than the upside down Autobot sticker (which can easily be remedied)...
I had no idea that Sonokong items generally sell for less than Takara originals. I stand corrected.
Autobot032 wrote:Oh wait. Let me guess, you're going to say it's not the same toy, the plastic's different, yada yada yada. That's been debunked so many times I've lost count.
^ This one, was for you. I don't deny that, but that's not a dig, nor was it a personal attack. I said nothing of the sort.
Autobot032 wrote:They're the same mold, same plastics, same toy, just repackaged through Sonokong via a license from Takara for the Korean market. There is nothing else different, other than the sticker and packaging.
Nothing.
This was for everyone, especially those who didn't know or weren't sure. This one wasn't directed at you, personally. I apologize for the confusion, I should've been clearer.
Autobot032 wrote:Oh and that's actually a good price for Brave Maximus, especially MIB. He seems to be rarer than his G1 counterpart. (at least in my eBay searches and sightings. Grand Max, however...that's another story. Ouch.)
This was for the O.P. or whoever else might be interested in buying a Brave Maximus. This, also, was not aimed at you.
I can see where you might've been confused, and I have apologized for the confusion. However, I did not get personal with you. You did that first, I only offered to help you receive a taste of your own medicine.
Bonger wrote:Ofcourse as usual, you can't just be aman and apologize. Nothing new to see here folks....
And yet again, right here ^, you personally attack and flame me AGAIN. This was absolutely uncalled for and was without provocation. You might have credence in nitpicking a post or opinion, but not the person. You have no right to determine whether or not I'm a man, simply because I didn't buckle and apologize to you for something I did not do.
You're the one who owes me an apology for getting personal. I'm sorry for getting the ball rolling because I wasn't clearer in my original post. That was my mistake and I admit it, but it wasn't aimed at you and wasn't personally attacking you or anyone else.
Now, if you're going to continue this, take it to PM, otherwise, let this thread carry on as it was originally intended. It's not fair for either of us to derail this poor poster's thread.