Page 1 of 1

Character Names Differ?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:42 pm
by BlackOut2K8
Ok this is weird, I seen the dvd of the Transformers again just to check out some things that may or may not seem out of place but I did catch something out of place. Of course 'Devastator' the big-ass Decepticon tank isn't called Devastator in his toy line, his name is Brawl, like the original Brawl of course is a tank similar to his movie counter-part besides the missile launchers and cow-catcher. The movie calls him Devastator, but then the toy line calls him Brawl, what the freak? I can see that Bonecrusher was there as a mine sweeper instead of a bulldozer and Devastator as a tank instead of a combiner, but what's with the name change in his toy line?

http://www.testblog.net/gallery2/d/4844 ... stator.jpg

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:46 pm
by publicvisage
I'm pretty sure this has been beaten about to death(and probably should be in the Movie forum). Oh well.

Devastator was the working name of the tank Transformer while they were shooting because names had not been finalized. The name was officially changed to Brawl, as reflected in the toy line. However, for what ever reason, the post-production crew(or whoever did the subtitles) didn't get the memo.

Now why they didn't correct it in the DVD...I can only assume they didn't bother since Brawl/Devastator has 0 lines in the movie and his name is only mentioned that once.

Hope that's somewhat helpful. :)

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:50 pm
by Barricade
...

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:55 pm
by BlackOut2K8
publicvisage wrote:I'm pretty sure this has been beaten about to death(and probably should be in the Movie forum). Oh well.

Devastator was the working name of the tank Transformer while they were shooting because names had not been finalized. The name was officially changed to Brawl, as reflected in the toy line. However, for what ever reason, the post-production crew(or whoever did the subtitles) didn't get the memo.

Now why they didn't correct it in the DVD...I can only assume they didn't bother since Brawl/Devastator has 0 lines in the movie and his name is only mentioned that once.

Hope that's somewhat helpful. :)


Yeah that helped, never thought about that situation, hey did you check out the Devstator render link?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:20 pm
by publicvisage
BlackOut2K8 wrote:
Yeah that helped, never thought about that situation, hey did you check out the Devstator render link?


Yes. It looks pretty cool, though I'm not sure how good combiners would function in the movie universe.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:01 pm
by Tigertrack
publicvisage wrote:
BlackOut2K8 wrote:
Yeah that helped, never thought about that situation, hey did you check out the Devstator render link?


Yes. It looks pretty cool, though I'm not sure how good combiners would function in the movie universe.


I am hoping that they would be quite functional and kick @$$ in the movie world. :D

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:33 pm
by bran10
so does this mean devastator won't be in the 2nd movie... since he's some what in this one? cus if they put devastator in the 2nd movie, people will be like what the eff (can you cus here?) wasn't he in the 1st movie but was a tank?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 11:12 pm
by sto_vo_kor_2000
publicvisage wrote:I'm pretty sure this has been beaten about to death(and probably should be in the Movie forum). Oh well.

Devastator was the working name of the tank Transformer while they were shooting because names had not been finalized. The name was officially changed to Brawl, as reflected in the toy line. However, for what ever reason, the post-production crew(or whoever did the subtitles) didn't get the memo.

Now why they didn't correct it in the DVD...I can only assume they didn't bother since Brawl/Devastator has 0 lines in the movie and his name is only mentioned that once.

Hope that's somewhat helpful. :)


I heard that Bay desided to keep the Name.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:15 am
by Tigertrack
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
publicvisage wrote:I'm pretty sure this has been beaten about to death(and probably should be in the Movie forum). Oh well.

Devastator was the working name of the tank Transformer while they were shooting because names had not been finalized. The name was officially changed to Brawl, as reflected in the toy line. However, for what ever reason, the post-production crew(or whoever did the subtitles) didn't get the memo.

Now why they didn't correct it in the DVD...I can only assume they didn't bother since Brawl/Devastator has 0 lines in the movie and his name is only mentioned that once.

Hope that's somewhat helpful. :)


I heard that Bay desided to keep the Name.


You know we wouldn't want to confuse the movie goers... :P

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:45 am
by Kanyon
Actually, Brawls name was originally going to be Devastator BUT before that he was going to be called Mr. Snuggles. But somehow Bay didn't like how it sounded..Mr. Snuggles..TERRORIZE. So it went to Brawl/Devastator. True Story. =O

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:07 pm
by sto_vo_kor_2000
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
publicvisage wrote:I'm pretty sure this has been beaten about to death(and probably should be in the Movie forum). Oh well.

Devastator was the working name of the tank Transformer while they were shooting because names had not been finalized. The name was officially changed to Brawl, as reflected in the toy line. However, for what ever reason, the post-production crew(or whoever did the subtitles) didn't get the memo.

Now why they didn't correct it in the DVD...I can only assume they didn't bother since Brawl/Devastator has 0 lines in the movie and his name is only mentioned that once.

Hope that's somewhat helpful. :)


I heard that Bay desided to keep the Name.


You know we wouldn't want to confuse the movie goers... :P


I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:13 pm
by Tigertrack
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:[

I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.


Of course, why not make sure not to use one of the favorite sub-gimmicks in the the TF line-- combination--.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:19 pm
by sto_vo_kor_2000
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.


Of course, why not make sure not to use one of the favorite sub-gimmicks in the the TF line-- combination--.


Its diabolyical :P But you have to admit its a logical way to ensure not HAVING to use the team in any of his movies.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:23 pm
by Tigertrack
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.


Of course, why not make sure not to use one of the favorite sub-gimmicks in the the TF line-- combination--.


Its diabolyical :P But you have to admit its a logical way to ensure not HAVING to use the team in any of his movies.


C O N S T R U C T I C O N M A X I M U S !!!!! :P

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:25 pm
by sto_vo_kor_2000
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.


Of course, why not make sure not to use one of the favorite sub-gimmicks in the the TF line-- combination--.


Its diabolyical :P But you have to admit its a logical way to ensure not HAVING to use the team in any of his movies.


C O N S T R U C T I C O N M A X I M U S !!!!! :P


Starts cleaning sniper rifle...............

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:29 pm
by Tigertrack
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.


Of course, why not make sure not to use one of the favorite sub-gimmicks in the the TF line-- combination--.


Its diabolyical :P But you have to admit its a logical way to ensure not HAVING to use the team in any of his movies.


C O N S T R U C T I C O N M A X I M U S !!!!! :P


Starts cleaning sniper rifle...............


Wait, what? *Ducks and covers*

Is that meant for me or Bay??? *Gulp*

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:51 pm
by sto_vo_kor_2000
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
tigertracks 24 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
I heard he dosnt like the idea of combiners so it was his way of making sure that at least in any of the films that he'll do there wont be a Devastator.


Of course, why not make sure not to use one of the favorite sub-gimmicks in the the TF line-- combination--.


Its diabolyical :P But you have to admit its a logical way to ensure not HAVING to use the team in any of his movies.


C O N S T R U C T I C O N M A X I M U S !!!!! :P


Starts cleaning sniper rifle...............


Wait, what? *Ducks and covers*

Is that meant for me or Bay??? *Gulp*


Bay........unless your working with him.