F-16's in the movie
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:43 pmAnyone else notice when they are scrambling the F-22's to head to the city, that the two planes shown on the ground taxiing(?) are actually F-16's?
The Energon Pub
SEIBERTRON - Your Planet For Everything Transformers
https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/
F-16's in the movie
https://www.seibertron.com/energonpub/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=22006
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:43 pmPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:53 pmI noticed it too.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:55 pmYup. And the tanks at the Qatar base looked like old M-60's too, which we don't use.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:48 pmPontimax 01 wrote:Yup. And the tanks at the Qatar base looked like old M-60's too, which we don't use.
They were. The base (the real base) had a giant graveyard of old tanks that they used for target practice. These were also used in the movie for when everything was getting destroyed. Gotta love the special features on this DVD.
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:34 pmYeah, i noticed the planes on the ground were different. They were getting to take off and respond to the battle. But they never reach the battle site.
Air-traffic?
Air-traffic?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:44 pmStock footage?
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:21 pmPOCimus Overdrive wrote:Stock footage?
Why didn't i think of that?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:21 amAuto Bot wrote:POCimus Overdrive wrote:Stock footage?
Why didn't i think of that?
Whaddya mean??
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:30 amDeceptiwho? wrote:Auto Bot wrote:POCimus Overdrive wrote:Stock footage?
Why didn't i think of that?
Whaddya mean??
Realize that it was stock footage. Cost-cutting.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:05 pmStock footage = footage that already exists that movie producers use over and over to fill in gaps, etc. So they don't have to shoot it over again and again.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:31 amYup. Exactly. Cost-cutting.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:33 amDidn't he also use some shots from Pearl Harbour in this? I'm thinking of the aircraft carrier shots.
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:58 amAre you sure? Pearl Harbour should not have modern carriers and F-16s.
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:02 pmI have noticed this as well. And when the pilots are running to their 22's, there are a couple of F-16'sbehind them. (The 22's, I mean.)
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:02 pmI have noticed this as well. And when the pilots are runnign to their 22's, there are a cuople of F-16'sbehind them. (The 22's, I mean.)
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:52 pmactually he did use the aircraft carrier shots for both movies.... he used the shot of a modern day ACC and moded it in the computer to look like a old ACC for the movie..... then in TFTM he just took the unmodded shots and used them in the film.... i think it's on the special edition...Auto Bot wrote:Are you sure? Pearl Harbour should not have modern carriers and F-16s.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 5:25 amCujo wrote:actually he did use the aircraft carrier shots for both movies.... he used the shot of a modern day ACC and moded it in the computer to look like a old ACC for the movie..... then in TFTM he just took the unmodded shots and used them in the film.... i think it's on the special edition...Auto Bot wrote:Are you sure? Pearl Harbour should not have modern carriers and F-16s.
That's really cheap.
