Page 1 of 1

Why was my thread about the transforming sound being in the movie locked?

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:50 pm
by Miken Ayers
? Yay?

Re: Why was my thread about the transforming sound being in the movie locked?

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:51 pm
by Autobot032
Miken Ayers wrote:? Yay?


This is better suited in a PM, directed to the Mods and Admins.
Just a little fyi in the future, so you don't encounter people jumping on you for being a noob.

Re: Why was my thread about the transforming sound being in the movie locked?

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:53 pm
by Miken Ayers
Autobot032 wrote:
Miken Ayers wrote:? Yay?


This is better suited in a PM, directed to the Mods and Admins.
Just a little fyi in the future, so you don't encounter people jumping on you for being a noob.


Ooh scary. People type bad things about me, and make me go hurt.

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:53 pm
by leastbay
Its because it has already been talked about in the link they gave you

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:53 pm
by Robinson
Because as Bishop said "it is already being discussed in said link. We don't need multiple links of useless info floating about. We can keep all of the useless info condensed into one thread.

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:55 pm
by Miken Ayers
Chris™ wrote:Because as Bishop said "it is already being discussed in said link. We don't need multiple links of useless info floating about. We can keep all of the useless info condensed into one thread.


This is too funny.

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:56 pm
by Robinson
Miken Ayers wrote:
Chris™ wrote:Because as Bishop said "it is already being discussed in said link. We don't need multiple links of useless info floating about. We can keep all of the useless info condensed into one thread.


This is too funny.


Is it not true? :???:

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:58 pm
by Miken Ayers
Chris™ wrote:
Miken Ayers wrote:
Chris™ wrote:Because as Bishop said "it is already being discussed in said link. We don't need multiple links of useless info floating about. We can keep all of the useless info condensed into one thread.


This is too funny.


Is it not true? :???:


Funny that grown men discussing Transformers feel they can judge what is and isn' useless. :-P

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:02 pm
by Robinson
Miken Ayers wrote:
Chris™ wrote:
Miken Ayers wrote:
Chris™ wrote:Because as Bishop said "it is already being discussed in said link. We don't need multiple links of useless info floating about. We can keep all of the useless info condensed into one thread.


This is too funny.


Is it not true? :???:


Funny that grown men discussing Transformers feel they can judge what is and isn' useless. :-P


Actually I am discussing the uselessness of a thread that if said poster would have taken 2 seconds to look around would have noticed it was already being talked about and then on top of the useless thread all that said poster put for an actual post was "yay". And to make matters worse this thread is twice as useless as the previously mentioned thread. :shock:

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:04 pm
by Hotrod

PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2007 9:02 pm
by Cyber Bishop
Why you ask, simple we don't need multiple threads on the same subject cluttering up the board.