Ooookay. Let's see if we can break the code here....
...sanora wrote:With hopes of getting close to the third live action movie now Transformers should be to first movie to never end filming and showing new movies.
Quite the subject matter expert myself i honestly can not find a reason why they should. Quickly mentally reviewing the massive amount of material there is clearly enough to "keep the buck moving."
What of Unicron and fortress maximous. Part two showing an ever so slight glimpse of a Omega Supreme. Yet, even before them, what of Rodimus Prime. The story of how he came about is a movie in itself. Carring the spark of Optimus, nearly intercepted by Decepticons and accidentally TRANSFORMED Rodimus to an autobot with a touch

.
Wow. I'm absolutely floored here. I'm not even sure where to begin, in all honesty.
1.) This is not G1. Other than names and a few locations and items being borrowed from the past, this is a reboot. Top to bottom. This is not G1, this is a new universe. Borrowing bits and pieces is fine, but a 1:1 copy in live action? Wouldn't work. You think the fans complain now? Hah.
2.) Massive amount of material or not, there's plenty of it that just wouldn't translate well to the big screen. Unicron? No. Just...no. A giant transforming planet? It would look stupid on the big screen, plus I, like many others, am just flat out sick and tired of him. Fort Max? Why? It won't get you a reissue of the toy. No toy = no reason to bring him back. Rodimus I wouldn't mind seeing, I suppose, but eh.
...subject matter expert? That's a big claim. Those are big shoes to fill.
...sanora wrote:What about the numerous Megatron bodies. What about the war in siebetron(CYBERTRON, wtf ever) or heaven. With the technology of today is there not an endless waltz of conniving tactics to produce energon here on earth and rule over cybertron and the galaxy .
What about the story of Skyfire. No not the old bloke jetfire. Skyfire was a decepticon, friends with Starscream and had a second heart do to the love of science, yea that's right a story of true love and free will.
Were we all not spermcells is that not a transformation from a single celled organism to a sentient being of 23 chromosomes. Fantasy is our futures forerunner and technology is atop its pedestal. If we truly love the cherubs then set the idea in their heads that they can transform the simple things before their eyes and use them as craftmans tools.

Shake
Okay, this started off with reasonable questions, but quickly devolved into...what I don't know but I'm genuinely confused in this segment. What is your point exactly? The last segment is just...uh.... Have you imbibed tonight, perhaps?
...sanora wrote:What, are you kidding me here. Seriously, about a 16th of what you said had to do with anything in my text.
Between Transformers G1,G2, and the five or sex animated movies, not to mention Beast Wars, is enough with modern technology for them to keep making movies.
Unicron is a planet eating transforming planet, what!, try making that. Fortress maximus is a building that had to fight Devastator, great fight scene for the big screen.
Dude, what Hasbros did with the three Transformers movies is by far the best live action movies EVER!!! made. If they Hasbros need ideas, email me.
Wow. Testy, aren't we? You're darn lucky that Blurz was able to make a coherent response to the...whatever the hell it is you've posted here.
Sure, we have modern technology to make the movies.
Sure, we can borrow or outright steal ideas from G1.
...why would we combine the two to make such a movie?
Obviously, the current setup is working and profitable. I mean ridiculously profitable. Over a billion dollars at the box office profitable. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Borrowing ideas from a dead and bygone era is okay to a certain extent, but bad if you want to embrace the future.
And Hasbro was involved, but not the only driving force behind these movies. It was a collaboration and everyone involved put blood, sweat, and tears into these suckers. Don't give Hasbro full credit.
And as much as I enjoy the movieverse, these are not the best live action movies "EvAr"! That's the honest truth. They have about as much depth as a puddle, and as much weight as a feather. They great fun, but they're not the best. That's just not true.
If you're stating it as an opinion, that's fine. You're entitled to your opinion and if you feel they're the greatest ever, so be it. Problem is, you make it sound as though it's a fact. If that's the case, it's simply not true. There's a difference between fact and opinion.
"TRANSFORMERS IS THE GREATEST MOVIE FRANCHISE, EVER!" Opinion.
"They're generally accepted by audiences as being fun, but they're not the best example of cinema." Fact.
There is a difference. If you were posting it as an opinion, then more power to you. If you're posting it as fact, then you're wrong.
Hasbro has plenty of ideas, they don't need ours. Our input, maybe. Ideas, not so much.