Page 1 of 1

Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:35 am
by Cliffjumper Prime

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:58 pm
by Red 50
That was all so true, tough I don't agree with insulting the Twins.

Astro and Omega should really be in the movie.

Galvatron and Cyclonus. Well, Cyclonus would be easier, actually, as Galvatron should be reformed from Megatron. But Cyclonus would be so cool, if he was anything like his G1 version: A true loyal and skillful d-con. Something like Starscream of this world was before becoming corrupt.

Primus, if they would be like rivals, they could have an epic battle.

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:07 pm
by OptiMagnus
Ultra Magnus and Rodimus Prime. Enough said.

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:07 pm
by zenosaurus_x
Cool list, I agree with Ultra Magnus, Kup, and the Sharkticons the most.
Omega Supreme sort of, as long as he's smaller than Devastator, I prefer Combiners stay the biggest.
I always liked Kup, he makes a good old man type of character.

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:27 am
by Red 50
zenosaurus_x wrote:Omega Supreme sort of, as long as he's smaller than Devastator, I prefer Combiners stay the biggest.


If Omega was a Shuttle in this movie, he SHOULD be smaller than Devastator, as D' is made of seven or more Constructicons, whose ALtmodes are HUGE. He himself as a shuttle should be mybe as tall as Devastator is, but since Devastator crawls on four legs, then...

Well, you can imagine.

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:27 am
by Rodimus Prime
Even if it doesn't make sense to bring in all of the dinobots, Grimlock still needs his chance to bite on the big screen.


F'N WIN!!!

Anyway, the character list.

Magnus - YES
Galvatron - YES
Kup - NO (Give Ironhide better development instead)
Blurr - NO (he might be a kid-favorite, but he'd be annoying)
Sharkticons - NO (Just stupid)
Grimlock - HELL YES
Cyclonus - YES
Unicron - NO (unless it's the absolute final movie)
Omega Supreme - NO (he might be in it already as the space shuttle+platform)
Astrotrain - YES

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:09 am
by DinobotKing
I will be very pissed if there is no form of Grimlock in this one....

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:15 pm
by Red 50
Grimlock, i'm afraid, won't be anyhow, because Bay once said that he wasn't into the Dinobots. It's a shame, I saw very cool picture of someone's Movie Grimlock in DeviantART - A mechanical tyrannosaurus, which was breathing fire. An awesome job. Looked very true.

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:57 pm
by Chaoslock
I got the feeling the author of that list just watched the 86 movie, and listed all the greater characters, plus got info on Omega Supreme from somebody. As for the list, I, for one, don't want to see cartoon Grimlock in the movie. The "dumb dinosaur" is the worst interpretation of the character ever made, but sadly, it is the best known in the media.

Ultra Magnus: Seeing as how little characteristics Bayformers got, I imagine Magnus won't be more than a bot with big guns.
Kup: Yeah, like we need more old-timers after Jetfire...
Blurr: Just how different would he be from Jolt? Another blue car in the fold.
Omega Supreme: Yeah, could work as a big gun, too, if there would be a Decepticon equivalent for him (Devastator returning, or Menasor?)
Galvatron: Bringing him in would bring either confusion (so, is he/isn't he Megatron) or dull surprise (seeing as how the third installation should bring a bigger threat than the first 2, another con at Megatron, or even the Fallens level won't increase the stakes)
Cyclonus, Astrotrain: Possible, as cannon fodder. But I doubt they would get any characterization.
Sharkticons: Don't think so, not even as cannon fodder. Bringing the quintessons in for the third installation without any sign would be a bad idea.
Unicron: Possible, but there wasn't any signs about him in the first two movies.

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:24 pm
by JeffX
Ultra Magnus would be cool.
I'd love to see Kup, but Jetfire kind of had his role in the last movie.
Blurr would be cool, but we have Jolt.
I'd love to see Omega Supreme, but I don't see where he would fit in in this movie.
Galvatron could be possible, but the only people who would know anything about Galvatron would be the fans. The casual people wouldn't know, which could keep be good or bad depending on the situation.
Cyclonous would be a nice addition to maybe serve under Starscream. I'd personally like to see Thundercracker and Skywarp but oh well.
Sharkticons not really.
Unicron would be very cool, but I don't see how that could be done based on what we have heard so far. Unless Unicron is the moon and for some reason Shockwave brings him back?

Re: Crave Online's 10 Transformers We Want To See In 'Transformers 3'

PostPosted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:40 pm
by devlingrey
Hello,

I normally don't post, I just lurk but movie speculation is fun.

I think that Crave's list is way off. I can see Grimlock, UM, Kup, OS, cyclonus and the sweeps and maybe even Galvatron (although the bay-verse Megatron is probably evil enough).

1. Wheeljack (there are rumors that he is in this movie but I will believe it when I see it)
2. Mirage (my all time favorite character - he was my first TF toy back in 86) Sadly, I think that he may be a goner. One of the heads in the Ark looks like it could be his with the chin/beard thing going on).
3. Brawn
4. Sunstreaker
5. Grimlock (war within version would be fine doesn't have to be a dinosaur)

Just my two cents