The Energon Pub

Yeah, I know what you mean about Edie. It's always a sad thing to let go of your frend, a person you've grown up with, after they've just been vaporized by a Decepticon pulse rifle.
~Josh

Uhh... Did we miss something?

5150 Cruiser wrote:Uhh... Did we miss something?

This.

You missed a spam bot, which is why you should post in spam bot threads because you end up looking stupid when the spam bot's post is removed.

So that's why this thread is still around? To prove how dumb he is?

Not to prove anything, I just wanted some giggles.

Ah, Burn, always getting your kicks on others' self-esteem. Or the damaging of it...

Oh dear dear Burn,
Ya should have left it, everyone would have had more of a giggle, now they all just look soooooooooo confused.

Allow then a breif recap!

For some reason, I don't know why, there was a spam post about some random character in Desperate Housewives which I'm guessing passed away. This person went on and on and on about how beautiful the meaning of life was and how gratefull we should be about life and other jarrgin which she (Or he, ya never know these days) milked out of some character named Elsie or something and whose ashes were spead on her former suburban yard and then carried into heaven.

I then replied, letter her know how painful it could be to let go when a friend is vaporized from a cannon, a small effort to keep the thread subject savvy.

Thats what I get for trying to console yet another victim of Michael Bay. So the real lesson here?

Michel Bay destroys lives. Thee End

Joshua Vallse wrote:
Thats what I get for trying to console yet another victim of Michael Bay. So the real lesson here?

Michel Bay destroys lives. Thee End

Huh?

OptiMagnus10 wrote:

Joshua Vallse wrote:
Thats what I get for trying to console yet another victim of Michael Bay. So the real lesson here?

Michel Bay destroys lives. Thee End

Huh?

Joshua Vallse wrote:Oh dear dear Burn,
Ya should have left it, everyone would have had more of a giggle, now they all just look soooooooooo confused.

Guess that proves your point.

P.S. I didn't move it.

Burn wrote:Not to prove anything, I just wanted some giggles.

Ya didn't huh? Look at you, taking credit for someone elses deletion. I'm almost proud.

On the bright side, I now have control over the threads subject matter. It's kind of intoxicating. Perhaps if I'm bored enough I'll change the subject of this thread yet again.....

Oh and for anyone else looking to find a rhyme or reason to this thread...well good luck to you.

Alas, parts of me would suggest this thread just die, just to keep other victims from falling prey. Another part of me kinda wishes for it to continue....a kind of social project here in this forum to which a controversal subject matter is picked and changed and see how the comunity acts as a whole. In fact I'll change the subject now to say...something like

"TF3 to be Horrible without Megan"

That should do it. I'l leave the rest to your whim dear Burn as to this projects future

Joshua Vallse wrote:On the bright side, I now have control over the threads subject matter.

I COULD change the title back AND lock your first post so it can't be editted.

But that might be pushing my authority, despite the fact it would give me lots of giggles at the expense of you.
I only have one more day of holidays so you'll be rid of me soon and i'll be back to being grumpy and disgruntled!

Burn wrote:I COULD change the title back AND lock your first post so it can't be editted.

But that might be pushing my authority, despite the fact it would give me lots of giggles at the expense of you.
I only have one more day of holidays so you'll be rid of me soon and i'll be back to being grumpy and disgruntled!

You've already tried to gain said amusement at my expense, which was amusing.

I'm kind of troubled now though, being I didn't get one random rant about how Megan Fox was going to ruin things if she stood in the film or how it's going to be that much better without her....alas this thread has already been revealed as a ruse. Pitty....

However I'm not one to be accused of...whats the term...flamming? Is that the term? My project has failed. I have no more interest.

Though, it would be interesting to see if the Moderators did indeed have the power to censor and edit or alter other members posts and such all along.....maybe another time.
~Josh

Joshua Vallse wrote:Though, it would be interesting to see if the Moderators did indeed have the power to censor and edit or alter other members posts and such all along.....maybe another time.
~Josh

They can do a helluva lot more than that. I was having trouble staying logged in, and when I asked about it, one of the mods said he was doing it, having some fun at my expense. Whether it was true or not, we may never know, the staff here is a mysterious and, quite frankly, terrifying lot. They're like the R'lyeh Police Department.

Aw come on! I was going to argue why TF doesn't need Megan Fox and it ended up being this slagging spambot thread again. I can't believe you guys are still at it.

Shadowman wrote:I was having trouble staying logged in, and when I asked about it, one of the mods said he was doing it, having some fun at my expense. Whether it was true or not, we may never know, the staff here is a mysterious and, quite frankly, terrifying lot. They're like the R'lyeh Police Department.

Hey, I've been on other forums where the mods wanted to kick people out just because they disagreed with users' opinions and because the users continued to defend their own opinion. I don't know of anyone on here who is that extreme. But I wouldn't find it funny that a mod was messing with me. That mod may have just said that to mess with you, unless you've been in discussions with him a lot. Some of the staff here are quite terrifying. One of the news guys (he'll go unnamed ) is just plain serious, since he takes everything I say seriously and he thinks I have no sense of humor. Burn finds me everywhere...like he's watching me...and following me. He creeps the slag out of me . Then I've had to back off from from a couple others after they flipped out on my posts. Man I guess they're worse than I thought. (Now that I think about it...I've had trouble staying logged in too. Curse whoever messes with me!)

I was gonna say Dark of the Moon was already gonna be better than the first two just cause Fox was gone.

Then I saw it's a retitled spam thread.

I'm sad now.

OptiMagnus10 wrote:Aw come on! I was going to argue why TF doesn't need Megan Fox and it ended up being this slagging spambot thread again. I can't believe you guys are still at it.

It's called having fun. At Joshua's expense.
You should try it sometime.

Burn wrote:

OptiMagnus10 wrote:Aw come on! I was going to argue why TF doesn't need Megan Fox and it ended up being this slagging spambot thread again. I can't believe you guys are still at it.

It's called having fun. At Joshua's expense.
You should try it sometime.

I know. I should've added something to indicate humor there. I was going to make fun of Joshua's original post but I just didn't feel like it. I mean, how does one miss a spambot? Isn't it a little very obvious?

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

It worked....I knew it would work.

I've already captured two. Optimagnus being the most fun it would seem. I'm all for continuing this conversations about Megan, it will amuse me, what do ya think Burn? Will it amuse you as well?

I do have valid points about about this subject, as random as my madness seems, there is order in chaos.







I also find it amusing some have yet to find what truly happened here

Joshua Vallse wrote:It worked....I knew it would work.

Please, you baited Optimagnus10. He's about our most wound up member who will defend the movies until his dieing breath! It was too easy!

it will amuse me, what do ya think Burn? Will it amuse you as well?

You may attempt to gain shits and giggles. I'd still do a better job.

Burn wrote:

Joshua Vallse wrote:It worked....I knew it would work.

Please, you baited Optimagnus10. He's about our most wound up member who will defend the movies until his dieing breath! It was too easy!

it will amuse me, what do ya think Burn? Will it amuse you as well?

You may attempt to gain shits and giggles. I'd still do a better job.

Scouts honor, I don't really think me and Optimagnus10 have ever met. Still, it was fun, and went according to plan muahahahaha.

Ah, I have Burns blessing, we shall commence.

I honestly do think this film will suffer from the lack of Megans presence mainly due to character dynamics. Alot of effort and invested emotion and interest was spent developing Her and Shia's character in the previous films, and replacing her at the home stretch with alot of doubt already creeping on "Moon" and a dead split between the fan base concerning "Fallen" will only add to the negative.

Honestly, rather then just picking a Victoria Secret model and trying to salvage that part of the character dynamic from the previous two films. It would have been wiser just to focus on Sam...and just Sam. If you think about it, the films revolve around Sam and his growth into adulthood. The first film was about a boy and his car...at it's core, as revealed by big Steven himself. The second movie was about the same boy discovering himself through college, and the strain on his personal life. Thats why "Fallen" seems a little whinny, kinda like Twilight ha ha. This film might be worth a lick if it just focused on Sam finally becoming a man as he's met with these real world challenges, and no one to hold his hand this time through. In fact his loss of his highschool sweetheart would have added a whole other dynamic, but now that there is another insta-girlfriend/hottie in the mix...I feel like the entire character dynamic will feel too recycled.

I think this is enough for now. PS, I heard rumors that Megan is penned to be the next Laura Croft....thoughts on this are welcomed as well.
~Josh

Capt.Failure wrote:I was gonna say Dark of the Moon was already gonna be better than the first two just cause Fox was gone.

Then I saw it's a retitled spam thread.

I'm sad now.

Cheer up Cap, it's a real thread this time. I promise, join the fun.

BTW, your new here huh? Welcome!

Joshua Vallse wrote:I honestly do think this film will suffer from the lack of Megans presence mainly due to character dynamics. Alot of effort and invested emotion and interest was spent developing Her and Shia's character in the previous films, and replacing her at the home stretch with alot of doubt already creeping on "Moon" and a dead split between the fan base concerning "Fallen" will only add to the negative.

Honestly, rather then just picking a Victoria Secret model and trying to salvage that part of the character dynamic from the previous two films. It would have been wiser just to focus on Sam...and just Sam. If you think about it, the films revolve around Sam and his growth into adulthood. The first film was about a boy and his car...at it's core, as revealed by big Steven himself. The second movie was about the same boy discovering himself through college, and the strain on his personal life. Thats why "Fallen" seems a little whinny, kinda like Twilight ha ha. This film might be worth a lick if it just focused on Sam finally becoming a man as he's met with these real world challenges, and no one to hold his hand this time through. In fact his loss of his highschool sweetheart would have added a whole other dynamic, but now that there is another insta-girlfriend/hottie in the mix...I feel like the entire character dynamic will feel too recycled.

I think this is enough for now. PS, I heard rumors that Megan is penned to be the next Laura Croft....thoughts on this are welcomed as well.
~Josh

Under normal circumstances I would agree about changing pivotal characters at such a late stage, however in this case I think they may just get away with it. Don't forget that Sam is, essentially an emotional adolescent male ruled by his hormones, its certainly plausible he could fall in and out of 'love' very quickly, hence Makala (Megan Fox) gets the boot.

I also like the way Bay decided to call Sam's new girlfriend Carly in a blatant attempt to appease some of the Geewunners!

MightyMagnus78 wrote:

Joshua Vallse wrote:I honestly do think this film will suffer from the lack of Megans presence mainly due to character dynamics. Alot of effort and invested emotion and interest was spent developing Her and Shia's character in the previous films, and replacing her at the home stretch with alot of doubt already creeping on "Moon" and a dead split between the fan base concerning "Fallen" will only add to the negative.

Honestly, rather then just picking a Victoria Secret model and trying to salvage that part of the character dynamic from the previous two films. It would have been wiser just to focus on Sam...and just Sam. If you think about it, the films revolve around Sam and his growth into adulthood. The first film was about a boy and his car...at it's core, as revealed by big Steven himself. The second movie was about the same boy discovering himself through college, and the strain on his personal life. Thats why "Fallen" seems a little whinny, kinda like Twilight ha ha. This film might be worth a lick if it just focused on Sam finally becoming a man as he's met with these real world challenges, and no one to hold his hand this time through. In fact his loss of his highschool sweetheart would have added a whole other dynamic, but now that there is another insta-girlfriend/hottie in the mix...I feel like the entire character dynamic will feel too recycled.

I think this is enough for now. PS, I heard rumors that Megan is penned to be the next Laura Croft....thoughts on this are welcomed as well.
~Josh

Under normal circumstances I would agree about changing pivotal characters at such a late stage, however in this case I think they may just get away with it. Don't forget that Sam is, essentially an emotional adolescent male ruled by his hormones, its certainly plausible he could fall in and out of 'love' very quickly, hence Makala (Megan Fox) gets the boot.

I also like the way Bay decided to call Sam's new girlfriend Carly in a blatant attempt to appease some of the Geewunners!

The thing that I don't like about it is that it would seem like the first 2 movies never happened. Unless she dies. That would be cool.

At this point in time I can say "I won't miss Megan Fox's acting ability".

Once I see the new bimbo though i fimrly believe i'll be wishing for Megan Fox to come back.

MightyMagnus78 wrote:I also like the way Bay decided to call Sam's new girlfriend Carly in a blatant attempt to appease some of the Geewunners!

Again with assuming it was Bay ... Bay doesn't write!