Seibertron.com Energon Pub Forums

News Credits: 409 · by **Stormrider** » Fri May 11, 2007 8:53 pm

Megan Fox gave a short detail about her role as an Hollywood actress. Fox was not too shy in explaining to Eye On Gambling that she often gets casted because of her looks.

"I'm not going to apologise for my looks. But there's much more to me than that. As a female, selling your sexuality is just too easy," said Megan Fox.

Fox's role in Michael Bay's hotly-anticipated 'Transformers' film will see her play a mechanic caught in a war between the battling robots.

The star insists she did all her own stunts, including smashing her way through a car window.

She said: "I actually had to step up and be the tough chick my character is supposed to be."

Megan Fox stars in Transformers Movie, which opens in the US on July 4.

You can check out the entire article here: here.

by **Predaprince** » Fri May 11, 2007 8:55 pm

I like it that she does her own stunts. Is it just me or does anybody else think she looks better in the film photos all messy and stuff rather than neat and tidy in non-film photos?

News Credits: 3 · by **Barricade** » Fri May 11, 2007 9:00 pm

Predaprince wrote:I like it that she does her own stunts. Is it just me or does anybody else think she looks better in the film photos all messy and stuff rather than neat and tidy in non-film photos?

word

News Credits: 1 · by **Ninja Sixshot** » Fri May 11, 2007 9:17 pm

Predaprince wrote:I like it that she does her own stunts. Is it just me or does anybody else think she looks better in the film photos all messy and stuff rather than neat and tidy in non-film photos?

second(or third it)

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Fri May 11, 2007 9:55 pm

Predaprince wrote:I like it that she does her own stunts. Is it just me or does anybody else think she looks better in the film photos all messy and stuff rather than neat and tidy in non-film photos?

Fourthed. (If that's even a word.)

I give her credit, that's ballsy.
That's why I have mucho respect for Angelina Jolie.
Anyone that does their own stunts is A-OK in my book.

by **Rodimus Primal** » Fri May 11, 2007 10:22 pm

So she's a hot air head playing a smart tough hot chick. Good to know....giggity giggity giggity goo!

News Credits: 8 · by **Liege Evilmus** » Fri May 11, 2007 10:31 pm

Selling sexuality easy, DUH.

Just keep showing her head shot and that snap of her working under BB's hood(lucky), and the one with the clevage.

She's a movie chick, sure she had to work in this one, but a movie chick non the less. If she was buck tooth and flat chested, reguardless of how great an actress she may be, she wouldn't have this part.

News Credits: 3 · by **Collector Maximus** » Fri May 11, 2007 10:37 pm

Megan Fox wrote:"I'm not going to apologise for my looks. But there's much more to me than that. As a female, selling your sexuality is just too easy," said Megan Fox.

What a wasted opportunity for a good quote. She should have said "But there's much more to me than meets the Eye."

by **sparkofchaos** » Fri May 11, 2007 10:39 pm

once again showing how there's too much focus on humans in this movie abt robots

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Fri May 11, 2007 10:41 pm

Rodimus Primal wrote:So she's a hot air head playing a smart tough hot chick. Good to know....giggity giggity giggity goo!

Well, they normally do cast people against their type. :p

by **Dclone Soundwave** » Fri May 11, 2007 11:19 pm

Huh. And here at first I thought she was one of the dumb blonde-type girls w/brown hair. I still don't know though................maybe she did do ger own stunts...........search me.

by **Nightracer GT** » Fri May 11, 2007 11:45 pm

sparkofchaos wrote:once again showing how there's too much focus on humans in this movie abt robots

You might as well start complaining about Megatron not being a gun, and omg Prime has flames....

by **Noisemaze** » Fri May 11, 2007 11:58 pm

How many mechanics look like that? I mean really!

News Credits: 668 · by **Autobot032** » Sat May 12, 2007 12:38 am

There's next to no realism in this movie. That's to be expected. It's called Science FICTION. It's supposed to be entertaining and out there. That's one of the selling points.

Flames, female mechanics, etc who cares? Giant robots are going to smash the **** out of one another on screen. How can you not love that?

by **Nemesis_Apoc** » Sat May 12, 2007 1:38 am

^couldn't have said it better myself ;)^

News Credits: 226 · by **Burn** » Sat May 12, 2007 1:38 am

Stormrider wrote:Megan Fox gave a short detail about her role as an Hollywood actress.

Wait ... she's an actress playing the role of a Hollywood actress? :???:

And has no one encountered a female mechanic before?

by **Conceptron** » Sat May 12, 2007 5:38 am

Liege Evilmus wrote:Selling sexuality easy, DUH.

Just keep showing her head shot and that snap of her working under BB's hood(lucky), and the one with the clevage.

She's a movie chick, sure she had to work in this one, but a movie chick non the less. If she was buck tooth and flat chested, reguardless of how great an actress she may be, she wouldn't have this part.

My friend, I believe you've hit the nail on the head.

News Credits: 11 · by **Robinson** » Sat May 12, 2007 10:01 am

Conceptron wrote:
Liege Evilmus wrote:Selling sexuality easy, DUH.

Just keep showing her head shot and that snap of her working under BB's hood(lucky), and the one with the clevage.

She's a movie chick, sure she had to work in this one, but a movie chick non the less. If she was buck tooth and flat chested, reguardless of how great an actress she may be, she wouldn't have this part.

My friend, I believe you've hit the nail on the head.

More and more I am believing the theory on the movie boards that you were somehow dissed by her and hold a huge grudge.

by **Roboto750** » Sat May 12, 2007 10:38 am

Collector Maximus wrote:
Megan Fox wrote:"I'm not going to apologise for my looks. But there's much more to me than that. As a female, selling your sexuality is just too easy," said Megan Fox.

What a wasted opportunity for a good quote. She should have said "But there's much more to me than meets the Eye."

That's what popped into my head when I read that line too...

by **Conceptron** » Sat May 12, 2007 11:18 am

Yeah, booo, the concept of her having more screentime than the Transformers is almost laughable.

by **Rodimus Cloud** » Sat May 12, 2007 11:21 am

Noisemaze wrote:How many mechanics look like that? I mean really!

Much more in our dreams thats for sure

News Credits: 1 · by **Leonardo** » Sat May 12, 2007 1:47 pm

Burn wrote:
Stormrider wrote:Megan Fox gave a short detail about her role as an Hollywood actress.

Wait ... she's an actress playing the role of a Hollywood actress?

And has no one encountered a female mechanic before?

I had a Neighbours-related response ready, but I thought you'd murder me.

sparkofchaos wrote:once again showing how there's too much focus on humans in this movie abt robots

Too much focus on humans? In what way?

News Credits: 49 · by **Senor Hugo** » Sat May 12, 2007 4:56 pm

Chris™ wrote:
Conceptron wrote:
Liege Evilmus wrote:Selling sexuality easy, DUH.

Just keep showing her head shot and that snap of her working under BB's hood(lucky), and the one with the clevage.

She's a movie chick, sure she had to work in this one, but a movie chick non the less. If she was buck tooth and flat chested, reguardless of how great an actress she may be, she wouldn't have this part.

My friend, I believe you've hit the nail on the head.

More and more I am believing the theory on the movie boards that you were somehow dissed by her and hold a huge grudge.

Hm, wrote her a fan letter that was never answered, so he still holds a grudge to this day?