HMW: Noticed the mission changes yet? UPDATED!!
Monday, January 19th, 2009 10:52AM CST
Categories: Site News, Heavy Metal WarPosted by: Psychout Views: 39,989
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Be sure to check back into the Heavy Metal War discussion boards to see how this affects the game over the next few months and to watch for any other changes that may be coming over the next few weeks.
Omega Sentinel write:
Just added 3 level 2-4 missions written by Psychout and Jeep.
1 = Max V Pred
1 = Bot V Con
1 = Con V Pred
Cheers guys,
Psychout.
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
57,704 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by Editor on January 19th, 2009 @ 11:02am CST
Omega Sentinel wrote:Just added 3 level 2-4 missions written by Psychout and Jeep.
1 = Max V Pred
1 = Bot V Con
1 = Con V Pred
NIfty, that should be good.
Posted by Wingspan on January 19th, 2009 @ 11:29am CST
Posted by Chaoslock on January 19th, 2009 @ 1:11pm CST
Posted by Wingspan on January 19th, 2009 @ 2:50pm CST
Chaoslock wrote:Just curious: Why are the Xp/€ payouts minimized at the new missions?
Minimized XP/Energon? Explain.
As a follow on to the Max/Pred missions - my mission win rate has increased for my team by 2% since the changes. Given how many missions have been played in total, that actually translates to winning some 90+% of my missions since the change. That may not be the balance the changes were looking for.
Further, G1/Pred is nearly non-existent; understanding that the new missions introduce some more of the opportunities, it seems like Beast and G1 are wholly or mostly isolated from each other. Perhaps the time to dial up the G1/Beast dial is coming up soon given how, as I understand it, the Bots are getting pounded just as badly as the Maximals are.
Information dump, </end> Let the experimentation continue.
Posted by Venomous Prime on January 19th, 2009 @ 3:23pm CST
Posted by Chaoslock on January 19th, 2009 @ 3:44pm CST
Wingspan wrote:Chaoslock wrote:Just curious: Why are the Xp/€ payouts minimized at the new missions?
Minimized XP/Energon? Explain.
The new mission gives only 100 Xp/ 50 € for base, while the base payout by a lv.2+mission used to be 300Xp/150€
Posted by Absolute Zero on January 19th, 2009 @ 4:25pm CST
Posted by Starlock on January 19th, 2009 @ 4:34pm CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 19th, 2009 @ 4:37pm CST
we need worthy opponents.WHo's steppin up to the plate?
Posted by Wingspan on January 19th, 2009 @ 5:12pm CST
Posted by Absolute Zero on January 19th, 2009 @ 7:26pm CST
New Missions we were told about seem to be myth. No one has seen them. They're like the earth game Star Wars Force Unleashed, an eternal rumor that is supposedly coming out but never will. Fellow Predacons have noted the increase in winning, but are lementing the most valuable resource on this planet, XP. Decepticons have come forward taunting us, claiming it's an addiction. If so, then they are far more addicted to it then we are. Despite their best efforts to halt our growth, however, two more Predacon warriors have attained level 3 threat status. The engineer known as Exia and melee fighter known as Rikou have both been upgraded in their threat rating today.
Posted by Shadowblade_DW on January 20th, 2009 @ 2:24am CST
Attempts to bring hope to the test subjects has been met with critisism. Better than I had hoped. Seems the experiment has left the subjects bitter and distrustful. I have been counseled by HQ that my "taunting" of the subjects may render the test results invalid. I disagree, my actions have been used to gauge if the experiment has changed the temperment of the test subjects. Continued research required. I almost feel bad for the preds. I remember a time I could only hope for a mission where my troops brought back 50xp or more. But the times were different then. It was not a lack of opponent that troubled us, but a overwhelming number. We did not have the troop capcity to mount a decent defense resulting in the broken morale of our younger commanders.
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 3:20am CST
we're sorry for what ever we did, can we please come of restriction?
we'll be good
Posted by Burn on January 20th, 2009 @ 3:51am CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:19am CST
Burn wrote:Didn't you guys ask for LESS Beast -vs- G1 missions and MORE Beast -vs- Beast missions?
thats like sayin you asked for a wooden train set when you were 5, and your parents are just now giving it to you.
yes we did ask for more, but not exclusive. all day i've seen 2 or 3 non beast missions. 2-3 over 14 hours? still havent seen the new missions that the news talked about. The maxi's are sparse, with the exception of short bursts of players every few hours, and even then it only lasts an hour at most. when i get more xp losing against people in the arena, than i do winning missions, why do missions?
the maxi's aren't active enough. they don't play that often. i get 8-10 no opposition missions, its discouraging. the preds didn't even fill all the missions. we never had that problem when there were 2 more factions. i've gone from getting between 500-1000 an average mission to 100-300 on an average mission. the slightly less cr time doesnt make a difference.
also i've heard the bots are now getting stomped, and the maxi's are too. We don't even have a chance to change factions if we don't like it (not that i would, but the option would be nice). this went from one extreme to the other. almost no maxi missions, to almost nothin but maxi missions. Granted it's probably great for beginners, but now the xp isn't enough.
Posted by Burn on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:45am CST
Name_Violation wrote:thats like sayin you asked for a wooden train set when you were 5, and your parents are just now giving it to you.
So can I take that as you saying that "it should have been done a long time ago"?
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:52am CST
Burn wrote:Name_Violation wrote:thats like sayin you asked for a wooden train set when you were 5, and your parents are just now giving it to you.
So can I take that as you saying that "it should have been done a long time ago"?
If it had been done from the get go it would be a different story.
its more like what am i gonna do with this now? would've been awesome if i had it at a different point in time. the point was about this radical change and nothing we can do about it but complain, and then get mocked for complaining.
keep mocking me. you know your gonna.
here i'll save you the trouble wahwahwahwahwahwah moan moan whine whine. it's all i friggen get anyway
Posted by Chaoslock on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:57am CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:59am CST
Chaoslock wrote:It's funny, as I see there are plenty of maximal commanders around (I encountered 3 different teams in the arena in the last hour)
but its 318 am my time. and their in the arena, i need them in missions. also its the lack of tevels. most maxis are 0-1, i'm used to fighting 2's and the occasional 3's
Posted by Burn on January 20th, 2009 @ 5:09am CST
Name_Violation wrote:If it had been done from the get go it would be a different story.
But how could it have been done from the get go?
NO ONE had any idea that the Beast factions wouldn't be as popular. A lot of people were under the impression that with everyone reset and having the ability to choose from four factions that things might be more balanced.
It didn't work out like that. And I don't see how it could have been done any differently.
When it became obvious that wasn't going to be the case something should have been done then, but I don't think people realise just how much of the site's data was damaged. And something people also seem to forget is that there's ONE Administrator of this game, and he's had his own issues to deal with in the real world. Trust me, he got his priorities right.
the point was about this radical change and nothing we can do about it but complain, and then get mocked for complaining.
keep mocking me. you know your gonna.
here i'll save you the trouble wahwahwahwahwahwah moan moan whine whine. it's all i friggen get anyway
No one's mocking you. Do yourself a favour and take a few hours away from the computer. It's just a game, I know from personal experience it is NOT worth getting upset over.
Posted by Archanubis on January 20th, 2009 @ 9:14am CST
Burn wrote:NO ONE had any idea that the Beast factions wouldn't be as popular. A lot of people were under the impression that with everyone reset and having the ability to choose from four factions that things might be more balanced.
It's been over 12 years since Beast Wars first aired. Not to sound like a total know it all, but I think it would have been logical to presume that some of the fans who came in with Armada would be unfamilair with who the Maximals and Predacons were, and those might have more likely chosen the more familiar factions.
But it's not like I don't let things slip through.
Posted by Venomous Prime on January 20th, 2009 @ 10:49am CST
Burn wrote:Didn't you guys ask for LESS Beast -vs- G1 missions and MORE Beast -vs- Beast missions?
For the record, I never asked for that
Maximal missions have always been a problem when I'm playing. Next to no opposition.
So to all the people who asked for more Maximal missions, I hate you
Posted by Judge Chuckachu on January 20th, 2009 @ 12:50pm CST
Posted by Mogwai Prime on January 20th, 2009 @ 1:27pm CST
Posted by Absolute Zero on January 20th, 2009 @ 2:31pm CST
Burn wrote:Didn't you guys ask for LESS Beast -vs- G1 missions and MORE Beast -vs- Beast missions?
That was the popular consensus. And as NV said, it would have helped earlier. When there were more maximals playing actively. Some, however, just advocated the lowering of the G1 missions to lower entries, like the 4v4. A few others changed their opinion once it became apparent that there weren't enough actively playing maximal commanders in missions.
They have the third largest faction... so where are they all?
Conspiracy time!
Posted by Pathogen7 on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:18pm CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 4:31pm CST
Only time will tell
Posted by Psychout on January 20th, 2009 @ 5:11pm CST
Posted by Absolute Zero on January 20th, 2009 @ 5:36pm CST
Posted by Psychout on January 20th, 2009 @ 6:08pm CST
Looks like the Maximals are starting to come out of hibernation.
Posted by Absolute Zero on January 20th, 2009 @ 6:43pm CST
Posted by Psychout on January 20th, 2009 @ 7:03pm CST
You may well be right, but we'll only find out when something is a stake.
Posted by Venomous Prime on January 20th, 2009 @ 7:57pm CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 9:01pm CST
Posted by Venomous Prime on January 20th, 2009 @ 9:14pm CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 20th, 2009 @ 9:16pm CST
original sin wrote:I don't care what faction it is, I just miss getting more then 300XP a mission and thats if I'm lucky!
Posted by Psychout on January 21st, 2009 @ 7:22am CST
They can only be spawned by you guys, so one of you must have activated it.
Posted by Name_Violation on January 21st, 2009 @ 1:08pm CST
Psychout wrote:So, how about you actually enter the missions that you do get against us?
They can only be spawned by you guys, so one of you must have activated it.
that post was 518 my time, otherwise i would have put wrought gut or overpowerthirst in it.
DAMN YOU BODILY NEED FOR SLEEP!!!
Posted by Wingspan on January 21st, 2009 @ 2:29pm CST
Name_Violation wrote:original sin wrote:I don't care what faction it is, I just miss getting more then 300XP a mission and thats if I'm lucky!
Must be ya'lls builds; I've got a 436, 491, 762, and 782 in my last 6 missions. What are you doing wrong?
Posted by Venomous Prime on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:03pm CST
Posted by Name_Violation on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:04pm CST
Wingspan wrote:Name_Violation wrote:original sin wrote:I don't care what faction it is, I just miss getting more then 300XP a mission and thats if I'm lucky!
Must be ya'lls builds; I've got a 436, 491, 762, and 782 in my last 6 missions. What are you doing wrong?
but averaged with the 100 xp missions its still not alot.
almost all my builds are high avoid, but a few are high strafe or ram. all but 3 of my bots are strait up avoiders with high speed and strong secondary tactics.
2 are high ram/str 1 is fp/strafe still with avoid and speed
Posted by Wingspan on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:24pm CST
How has the mission change affected the G1 battles?
Posted by Sharpwing on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:30pm CST
Wingspan wrote:Changing subjects.
How has the mission change affected the G1 battles?
'Cons just dominate, nothing more to say about it.
My mission % and my € are both on the decline
Posted by Wingspan on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:32pm CST
I think someone mentioned "give it a week"; we're in day 5 so any recommendations should be considered for changes soon.
Posted by Editor on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:40pm CST
I'm ok with just fighting autobots, but knowing the others are out there seams like a waste.
It was a good idea but it's just creating more restiction than assistance.
Posted by Wingspan on January 21st, 2009 @ 3:49pm CST
The only change I think anyone should recommend at this point would be to increase the generation of G1 missions by Beasts. All others still seem valid and to have improved the game.
Posted by Psychout on January 21st, 2009 @ 5:39pm CST
http://www.seibertron.com/heavymetalwar ... n_id=19648
Posted by Pariah on January 21st, 2009 @ 5:46pm CST
Either way i'd like to see some of those 0-1 missions i remember so fondly
Posted by Wingspan on January 21st, 2009 @ 10:16pm CST
Psychout wrote:Come on preds! only 2 spaces to fill...
http://www.seibertron.com/heavymetalwar ... n_id=19648
Way to pick on the little guy Half decent showing against larger opponents, although not the "millions of XP" you purples are used to I'm sure. We'd be glad to make more Level 3s for you to slaughter if you'll just get us the XP to make them.
Posted by The {Rage Bot} on January 21st, 2009 @ 11:53pm CST