Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010 11:16AM CDT

Categories: Toy News, Knock Offs, Unlicensed Products News
Posted by: RodimusConvoy13 Views: 85,715

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

ACToys have posted an image of MGT-02 Firestar. This is from the same company that has recently produced an Arcee figure. It is not from Impossible Toys though. Click here to see the thread on ACToys.

Credit(s): El Duque

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Recent Transformers News

Chris Hemsworth Posts Video of Himself Talking about the Upcoming Transformers One Trailer

Posted 3 days ago

Click here to post your comment about this news story!

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137862)
Posted by Jesterhead on October 20th, 2010 @ 11:40am CDT

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Face looks... melted. Or is that just me? Unfinished at least.

I was going to say that the face looks like a wad of chewed up bubblegum... :-?

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137870)
Posted by ThunderThruster on October 20th, 2010 @ 12:10pm CDT

There a few points on this that say 'this is going in the right direction' but generally it just screams 'put me outta my misery!'

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137882)
Posted by MGrotusque on October 20th, 2010 @ 12:38pm CDT

Pretty damn ugly but i like it....like it alot. She's got a great retro space look.
I've always liked ugly TF's and this fits the bill. If she's not too pricey i'd buy her for sure.
Sure she has kibble on the back but they're getting the femeinine aspect of these TF's down now which is important. Hard to get that classic cartoon feminine look without kibble in my opinion.
If you had panels attached to the arms and big blocky legs you'd totally lose the look. So i don't mind the kibbble on the back.
I even like the wheels dangeling off the thighs.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137883)
Posted by SLUGSLINGER81 on October 20th, 2010 @ 12:41pm CDT

She def got some junk in that trunk...sorry I had too :lol:

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137932)
Posted by Brychanus on October 20th, 2010 @ 2:31pm CDT

Oh my. She looks like the Queen of All Cosmos from Katamari Damacy.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137933)
Posted by PraetorGix on October 20th, 2010 @ 2:36pm CDT

Mmhh, I think I like it quite much (aside from the turd-helmet) The articulation is quite good, and with a more careful paint job it could be really nice. Let us wait for the price tag nevertheless...

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137964)
Posted by Doctor McGrath on October 20th, 2010 @ 4:10pm CDT

Clever pose, trying to neglect the fact it's is inevitably back-heavy. I refuse to believe this is a finished product.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137973)
Posted by Mindmaster on October 20th, 2010 @ 4:31pm CDT

Firestar's face is just.... downright ugly. And yes, my passionate hate for 3rd party products still burns. :lol:

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137986)
Posted by The Legend on October 20th, 2010 @ 5:32pm CDT

It looks like it's made of candle wax.
Where did these guys get the idea that there was enough demand for these characters to make it financially viable to make them?

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1137988)
Posted by Gauntlet101010 on October 20th, 2010 @ 5:38pm CDT

The Legend wrote:It looks like it's made of candle wax.
Where did these guys get the idea that there was enough demand for these characters to make it financially viable to make them?

Other than companies making Quintessons, Springer, Arcee, Hearts of Steel Prime, the Autoscouts, the MP Coneheads, and all the other 3rd party merchendise?

If it were MUCH cheaper it might even have been worth getting. But, as you say .... candle wax. The headsculpt alone makes it not worth it.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138001)
Posted by Covenant on October 20th, 2010 @ 6:23pm CDT

That looks terrible.

Of all the third party companies, I'm still awaiting some Fembots that look decent.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138042)
Posted by MGrotusque on October 20th, 2010 @ 8:53pm CDT

i keep looking at her and she looks like a female version/sister of G1 Repugnus to me. Same colours and backpack and little beady eyes in bot mode. Now she needs to shoot sparks and i'd be sold.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138049)
Posted by angelababy on October 20th, 2010 @ 9:18pm CDT

That's quite the backpack on her.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138092)
Posted by Blurrz on October 20th, 2010 @ 11:59pm CDT

Don't feel like dropping a hundy on a figure like that.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138094)
Posted by zenosaurus_x on October 21st, 2010 @ 12:07am CDT

Not that I'd buy it anyways, but it still looks pretty bad...

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138104)
Posted by Prime Riblet on October 21st, 2010 @ 12:52am CDT

Wow! That girl is not very purdy.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138117)
Posted by Hal7300 on October 21st, 2010 @ 2:42am CDT

''Ming-wing cabinet making MGT 02 Fire Star?''

'nuff said

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138135)
Posted by Mechastrike on October 21st, 2010 @ 5:37am CDT

needs more adjustments. but i still can't wait for the rest of the Femme Bots though.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138220)
Posted by kirbenvost on October 21st, 2010 @ 9:38am CDT

Anybody notice that the legs are basically the same as the recent Arcee's? So it's just a heavy remold, I guess.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1138285)
Posted by Blurrz on October 21st, 2010 @ 12:07pm CDT

kirbenvost wrote:Anybody notice that the legs are basically the same as the recent Arcee's? So it's just a heavy remold, I guess.

They're releasing Arcee, Firestar, Minerva, Moonracer and Elita-1.. so I wouldn't doubt it.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153057)
Posted by fenrir72 on December 2nd, 2010 @ 8:45am CST

I hope they'll improve her face. They got Arcee's face spot on.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153076)
Posted by SN95 Cobra R on December 2nd, 2010 @ 10:08am CST

Girl them thighs is thick! What are those 205/55 16's?

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153101)
Posted by ShardFenix on December 2nd, 2010 @ 12:03pm CST

man the poeople who made valkyrie should have done this. i would have got it since i think their's would have been done right...but this is just ugly

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153106)
Posted by Mkall on December 2nd, 2010 @ 12:17pm CST

a better head and a few paint apps would go a long way to making this a better looking figure.

I'm usually not one to complain about backpacks, but that one is HUGE!

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153109)
Posted by El Duque on December 2nd, 2010 @ 12:34pm CST

ShardFenix wrote:man the poeople who made valkyrie should have done this. i would have got it since i think their's would have been done right...but this is just ugly

Actually this is being made by the same people who made Delicate Warrior, who is considerably better than IT Valk. Hopefully the pics we've seen are only prototypes. They did a great job on Delicate Warrior. I've got both and there's really no comparison.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153730)
Posted by Blackstreak on December 4th, 2010 @ 10:43am CST

Those pictures make the plastic look really cheap and flimsy. But I would order Firestar simply because I don't have her yet.

Re: Image of Third Party MGT-02 Firestar (1153806)
Posted by Scaleface on December 4th, 2010 @ 3:01pm CST

I'd buy it for a Deluxe price, but not for the price they will probably charge for it.