LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation

Saturday, September 1st, 2007 6:28PM CDT

Categories: Movie News, Toy News
Posted by: Tigertrack Views: 45,305

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

News has been kind of slow this weekend, so I thought I'd post this incredible block bot.

He's a creation of Brick Frenzy, who have a site of many different Lego creations.

Coming in at about 16 inches tall in robot mode, and approximately 2 feet in alt mode, Blackout is fully transformable, and modeled after the toy version.

You can see the Blackout gallery here.

Transformers News: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation

I don't know about you, but it makes me want to pull out my LEGOs and start creating again.

Credit(s): TFW 2005

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Recent Transformers News

SDCC 2025 Jetfire / Void Rivals Boxed Set Official Pictures Revaled

Posted 8 hours ago

Transformers Earthspark Spitfire and Cosmos Stock Photos Revealed

Posted 8 hours ago

Walmart Opens Store Page For Retro G1-Inspired Seaspray, Plus Potential Brawn Leak

Posted 1 day ago

New Galleries: Power of the Primes Prime Masters Vector Prime, Micronus and Liege Maximo

Posted 1 day ago

Christmas in July- New Transformers Hallmark Keepsake Ornaments have been Released and Available

Posted 3 days ago

New Gallery: Robosaur Triceratops (aka KO G1 Dinobot Slag)

Posted 4 days ago

Twincast / Podcast Episode #379 "PUBG Crawl"

Posted 4 days ago

Transformers #22, GI Joe #9, Void Rivals, Spawn, Toxic Avenger + more in-stock at Seibertron Store

Posted 6 days ago

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317579)
Posted by Lapse Of Reason on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:34pm CDT

Awesome!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317580)
Posted by one wing angel on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:34pm CDT

wow

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317596)
Posted by Tigertrack on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:45pm CDT

Indeed on both replies!!!

I wish I could do that!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317616)
Posted by mattyc1007 on September 1st, 2007 @ 6:57pm CDT

i want that one!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317631)
Posted by HighPrime on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:08pm CDT

The Toy version should model after this one! I like this better than the Hasbro verison. Nice work :-)

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317656)
Posted by tom brokaw on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:26pm CDT

wow.... way cool

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317658)
Posted by kenshin_07 on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:27pm CDT

Oh wow! That's pretty spectacular!
Hehe it'd be cool if there was a little scorponok to go with it!

I see what you mean about wanting to start building again too!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317687)
Posted by Dclone Soundwave on September 1st, 2007 @ 7:42pm CDT

Whoa. Makes me wish I still had my Bionicles to give it more posability. Hey...that's not a bad idea. Too bad I gave them all away to Goodwill............

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317822)
Posted by InvaderJes on September 1st, 2007 @ 9:41pm CDT

Now this is how those TF and GI Joe Lego sets from a few years back SHOULD have looked! Hoo-leee wow!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317848)
Posted by 1337W422102 on September 1st, 2007 @ 9:59pm CDT

The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317880)
Posted by Cyber-Kun on September 1st, 2007 @ 10:17pm CDT

It's face looks more like a decepticon then the movie.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (317919)
Posted by Autobot032 on September 1st, 2007 @ 10:44pm CDT

O_o...wow.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318062)
Posted by First-Aid on September 2nd, 2007 @ 12:50am CDT

Two things go through my mind...

1. Cool!
2. SOmeone has WAY too much time on their hands.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318064)
Posted by First-Aid on September 2nd, 2007 @ 12:51am CDT

1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!

Got a source on that? I've always used "legos" when referring to multiple Lego bricks. I wonder what Webster's has to say about it? :-?

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318070)
Posted by Radical Ninja on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:17am CDT

1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!

Actually, this isn't true, although it is a popular misconception.

I refer you to LEGO's 2004 Company Profile:

http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/compprofileeng.pdf

On the last page (16) of the document, it states:

- The LEGO brand name should always be written in capitals.

- The LEGO brand name must not be used generically - nor should it be used in the plural form or the possessive, e.g. "LEGO's".

- When the LEGO brand name is used as a noun, it must never stand alone. It must always be accompanied by another noun. For example, LEGO set, LEGO products, LEGO Company, LEGO play materials, LEGO bricks, LEGO universe, etc.

So technically, you can have neither a single LEGO nor multiple LEGO (or LEGOs). You can only have one LEGO brick or multiple LEGO bricks.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318110)
Posted by Autobot032 on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:48am CDT

Radical Ninja wrote:
1337W422102 wrote:The plural of Lego is 'Lego.' The word 'Lego' is like the word 'rice,' you can have a bowl of rice and you can have a bucket of Lego. You can have a single grain of rice and you can have a single Lego brick. But you cannot have rices, nor can you have Legos. Gaah!

Actually, this isn't true, although it is a popular misconception.

I refer you to LEGO's 2004 Company Profile:

http://www.lego.com/info/pdf/compprofileeng.pdf

On the last page (16) of the document, it states:

- The LEGO brand name should always be written in capitals.

- The LEGO brand name must not be used generically - nor should it be used in the plural form or the possessive, e.g. "LEGO's".

- When the LEGO brand name is used as a noun, it must never stand alone. It must always be accompanied by another noun. For example, LEGO set, LEGO products, LEGO Company, LEGO play materials, LEGO bricks, LEGO universe, etc.

So technically, you can have neither a single LEGO nor multiple LEGO (or LEGOs). You can only have one LEGO brick or multiple LEGO bricks.

I always said Legos. Hmm. Learn something new everyday. Even if you don't want to.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318215)
Posted by Supreme Convoy on September 2nd, 2007 @ 3:49am CDT

Whoa... that's sweet looking!

Hopefully Hasbro releases more sophisticated Lego-esque line (unlike the BTR line) like this.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318296)
Posted by terc81 on September 2nd, 2007 @ 5:21am CDT

It's just... 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O

The closest transforming LEGO toy (in deference to the sub-thread on the proper use of the word LEGO

) I had that worked was the StarWars LEGO Technic Droideka, which had a lot of kibble and pales in comparison to this.

Makes me wonder what happened to the LEGO Escaflowne I also drooled over some time ago.

Kudos to the Brickmasters!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318336)
Posted by Tigertrack on September 2nd, 2007 @ 6:16am CDT

terc81 wrote:It's just... 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O 8-O

The closest transforming LEGO toy (in deference to the sub-thread on the proper use of the word LEGO ) I had that worked was the StarWars LEGO Technic Droideka, which had a lot of kibble and pales in comparison to this.

Makes me wonder what happened to the LEGO Escaflowne I also drooled over some time ago. Kudos to the Brickmasters!

Terc81 welcome! As you can plainly see Seibertron contains nuts of all sorts. Sorry that I misspelled the plural of LEGO apparently, but fear not, the site is a high quality place to hang out even if the news crew sometimes makes a spelling error. Enjoy the community, it's the best (and obviously smartest) around.

"Let the person without sin, cast the first stone..." in regards to spelling.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318857)
Posted by Liege Evilmus on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:04pm CDT

Very Very cool!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (318906)
Posted by Auto Bot on September 2nd, 2007 @ 1:39pm CDT

I like to see the helicopter mode!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (319643)
Posted by i_amtrunks on September 2nd, 2007 @ 7:57pm CDT

Crazy crazy creator.

Love the fanmade lego-bots.

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (319822)
Posted by Bombus distinguendus on September 2nd, 2007 @ 8:56pm CDT

be nice if he showed what peices were used and if any kits were used also?

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (320810)
Posted by Fred2012 on September 3rd, 2007 @ 8:33am CDT

theres one on youtube like this but with the same colours as blackout, there both really good

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (322036)
Posted by Nemesis Maximus on September 3rd, 2007 @ 9:05pm CDT

This is a really awesome custom!!! To bad the built to rule transformers were so bad! They should learn from this guy!

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (323079)
Posted by devil prime on September 4th, 2007 @ 11:02am CDT

damn thats cool

Re: LEGO Blackout--A Brickfrenzy.com Creation (328172)
Posted by Dinobot Prime on September 6th, 2007 @ 5:32pm CDT

Man, this guy totally stole my thunder. Granted, I've only got a rotor so far but still. Besides, mine's going to be better, seeing as I've figured out the way he REALLY transforms.

But that is pretty flipping sweet. And way too big for me.