Michael Bay on Transformers Dark of the Moon 3D Blu-ray Color and Brightness Issues
Wednesday, February 8th, 2012 11:23PM CST
Category: Movie Related NewsPosted by: El Duque Views: 39,143
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
The reason some 3D TV color on some systems might not look perfect? Well because there is no standards in 3D. It sounds stupid doesn't it. When we color transfer we spend weeks on a single format. Six weeks on the feature, then weeks additional on DVD, then weeks more on 3D. Every single shot might have brightness windows color moves high light adds. My colors on almost every one of my films have had almost perfect color space scores. I'm the guy who did the first - film to digital - digital transfer release on a movie - Bad Boys 2. I know color and telecine equipment better then almost any director out there. But when I started doing my 3D transfer with the most talented color telecine expert in the world, my buddy Stephan. He told me 3D is fucked. There is no standard to the equipment it is the wild west right now. So if it looks bad it's your product. We aimed color space for the most the equipment that has the biggest market share. In our room it looked perfect. So I'm sorry but it's your equipment. Tell the business to standardize and it will all look perfect in the future. Sorry.
Michael
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by BATTOUSAIXD on February 8th, 2012 @ 11:30pm CST
Posted by jrgreer74 on February 9th, 2012 @ 12:07am CST
"The Cat in the Hat knows a lot about that!" in 3D anyone?

Posted by Aluus on February 9th, 2012 @ 12:12am CST
The reason some 3D TV color on some systems might not look perfect? Well because there is no standards in 3D. It sounds stupid doesn't it. When we color transfer we spend weeks on a single format. Six weeks on the feature, then weeks additional on DVD, then weeks more on 3D. Every single shot might have brightness windows color moves high light adds. My colors on almost every one of my films have had almost perfect color space scores. I'm the guy who did the first - film to digital - digital transfer release on a movie - Bad Boys 2. I know color and telecine equipment better then almost any director out there. But when I started doing my 3D transfer with the most talented color telecine expert in the world, my buddy Stephan. He told me 3D is **** There is no standard to the equipment it is the wild west right now. So if it looks bad it's your product. We aimed color space for the most the equipment that has the biggest market share. In our room it looked perfect. So I'm sorry but it's your equipment. Tell the business to standardize and it will all look perfect in the future. Sorry.
Michael
Does he really have to sound like a dick, EVERY time he opens his mouth?

Posted by IAmThePeej on February 9th, 2012 @ 12:56am CST
Translation wrote:Look, you see, I spend all my time doing this, what I see is great because I make SO MUCH MORE than you ever will, so I buy the best equipment, TVs, everything. So everything looks great on my end. I had a friend come over and explain really quick what Telecine means, and because he knows some pretty damn big words, I think he's the best there ever is and ever will be. I also like saying I'm better than everyone at everything I do. Now as for why my 3D BluRays don't look good in your house? You bought a Vizio from WalMart on Black Friday because that's all you can afford. Not my problem, its yours. I'm not broke, so it looks great on my setup. Go buy something better and it just MAY look slightly better. I mean, what else are credit cards for? Sorry (not really).
Michael
Am I the only one who read it as this^?
I seriously don't like him as a director, and his response to a problem is "go buy a new 3DTV/ BluRay Player/ Glasses"?
Thanks dick for telling me its my fault and to go buy better stuff.. He's really shown why I don't support his "movies", if you can call SFX porn a real movie.
Posted by Burn on February 9th, 2012 @ 2:02am CST
IAmThePeej wrote:I seriously don't like him as a director, and his response to a problem is "go buy a new 3DTV/ BluRay Player/ Glasses"?
Thanks dick for telling me its my fault and to go buy better stuff.. He's really shown why I don't support his "movies", if you can call SFX porn a real movie.
Way to misinterpret.

The only thing he said is basically put a call out for 3D technology to have a standard developed so that 3D looks the same on ALL tv's. Thus people won't have to go out and buy different equipment for different movies.
He never said you had to go out and buy different technology, just that if it looks bad on your screen, it's because your technology isn't compatible with his because there's no standard.
Posted by karellan on February 9th, 2012 @ 7:12am CST
I have a Samsung 3D TV from 2010, and the 3D on it looks better than the 3D in theaters, pretty much without exception. Transformers 3 looks awesome on it.
Posted by T-Macksimus on February 9th, 2012 @ 10:34am CST
Stuff like this is EXACTLY why I have been scoffing at the idea of 3D TV since the beginning. It's too $%&@ early in the development of the technology and, here's the worst part, all of you know it and you still buy the @$#% things because you just HAVE to have the latest, coolest High Tech stuff out there!!! Bunch of freaking lemmings or sheep is what you folks are and you deserve the crap results you wind up with.





Posted by karellan on February 9th, 2012 @ 10:59am CST
You were right about one thing though: I do think you're a prick.
Posted by Bouncy X on February 9th, 2012 @ 11:24am CST
hell a recent example is the first Lord of the Rings EE, with all this hoopla about "green tinting", i didn't see a thing and it looked the same to me. now thats not saying these issues aren't real, just that 99% of people probably wont notice.
as for this particular case, i do have the 3D package but no 3D tv since i just got it for the extras and have no interested in 3D so least the 2D version is apparently not "broken". lol
Posted by jrgreer74 on February 9th, 2012 @ 12:33pm CST
Posted by Burn on February 9th, 2012 @ 1:32pm CST
Bouncy X wrote:i'm willing to bet whoever can even spot these "problems" are probably really really tech savvy folk. i'm sure most of the general population (myself included) wouldn't even notice it. can't count how often i read reviews about picture problems that i dont notice even after its described.
I still can't see the difference between a DVD and a Blu-Ray.

Posted by jrgreer74 on February 9th, 2012 @ 2:00pm CST

Posted by Oilspill on February 10th, 2012 @ 1:48am CST
Posted by cotss2012 on March 27th, 2012 @ 7:52pm CDT
T-Macksimus wrote:I'm laughing my A**off right now (and yes, I'm probably going to come across as an even bigger prick than a lot of you think that Bay is, and I don't care).
Stuff like this is EXACTLY why I have been scoffing at the idea of 3D TV since the beginning. It's too $%&@ early in the development of the technology and, here's the worst part, all of you know it and you still buy the @$#% things because you just HAVE to have the latest, coolest High Tech stuff out there!!! Bunch of freaking lemmings or sheep is what you folks are and you deserve the crap results you wind up with.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


I couldn't have said it better myself. 3D is crap right now.
Let me know when I can see something in 3D without those stupid glasses that make everything too dark.