MSNBC's Take on the Transformers Movie
Thursday, April 26th, 2007 9:16PM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, EditorialsPosted by: Air Commander Starscream Views: 32,886
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
"It’s got a lot of buzz among the fanboys but it’s still tough to predict if it play beyond that core group. One thing’s for sure, if this one’s no good, Bay won’t be working anytime soon."
Stuart predeicts the Transformers Movie to bring in around $235 million which puts it at #6 on his list. To read the rest of his take on the Transformers Movie and 9 others, please click here.
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
56,927 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by 1337W422102 on April 26th, 2007 @ 9:32pm CDT
Posted by Brakethrough on April 26th, 2007 @ 9:36pm CDT
Posted by Acecool on April 26th, 2007 @ 9:37pm CDT
Posted by Screambug on April 26th, 2007 @ 9:38pm CDT
Posted by Dragontron88 on April 26th, 2007 @ 9:38pm CDT
Posted by Robinson on April 26th, 2007 @ 10:00pm CDT
Acecool wrote:You mean that Bay's career hangs in the balance with this craptacular movie? Oh thank god. Good bye Mr. Bay. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Good job Mr. Bay, no one thinks it'll play beyond the core fanboys and you've alienated them.
You'll just say anything to try to dog Bay won't you. The group of "fanboys" that are "alienated" seems to be dwindling by the day. While not everyone likes all of the designs they will still give the movie a chance.
Posted by jdre_124 on April 26th, 2007 @ 10:27pm CDT
Regarding Stuart Levine's comments I say to not believe him. Many times box office predictions arent true. A prime example is 300. 300 is making a hefty profit and Box Office predictors said it would get past 150 million. Its made more than double that. Well I guess Transformers rides on us fellow Transformer Fans. If we call BS after July 4th the movie may fail. I'm looking foward to the movie.
Posted by The Shadow on April 26th, 2007 @ 10:27pm CDT
I freely admit I still have concerns about the movie - but if the movie is done well [treatment of source, quality-wise, etc.] I think the movie up could hit the number 3/4 spots {$270 - $290 million on the list}.
However, if the movie is not done well [see above] we could easily see a mirror performance of Dean Devlin's and Roland Emmerich's 1998 "Godzilla" movie. A rather good/respectable first weekend but quickly tapering off in subsequent weeks as as Transformers fans and average movie-goers look towards other films.
I'm pretty certain that PotC and Spidey have the number 1 and 2 spots locked down tight, I don't think any other movie this summer will be able to touch 'em.
Posted by Roboto750 on April 26th, 2007 @ 10:32pm CDT
Posted by PrimulArchangel on April 26th, 2007 @ 10:35pm CDT
Posted by TheMuffin on April 26th, 2007 @ 10:42pm CDT
Posted by Collector Maximus on April 26th, 2007 @ 11:03pm CDT
1337W422102 wrote:I can't help but laugh at the quoted part.
Same here! I got a good laugh from that. I'm sure the movie will perform well despite some disagreement about character designs and what not.
And Die Hard isn't on the list...Though I guess I'm not surprised.
Posted by NuclearConvoy on April 26th, 2007 @ 11:04pm CDT
Posted by Powermaster Jazz on April 26th, 2007 @ 11:14pm CDT
Posted by Zeedust on April 26th, 2007 @ 11:59pm CDT
I see Transformers in the number five slot easily, and only because Harry, Spidey, Pirates, and Shrek are huge mega-franshises movie-wise already, whereas Transformers haven't been on the big screen in 21 years.
Posted by clk430r1 on April 27th, 2007 @ 12:04am CDT
Posted by skeletal13 on April 27th, 2007 @ 12:28am CDT
Nightwatcher wrote:Theres no way in Hell it'll beat POTC or SM3.
I've seen it predicted in several places that the box office hits will be POTC 3, SM 3, and TF, in that order.
Posted by TheMuffin on April 27th, 2007 @ 12:37am CDT
Posted by clk430r1 on April 27th, 2007 @ 12:47am CDT
Posted by Sentinel Maximus on April 27th, 2007 @ 1:15am CDT
Posted by Leonardo on April 27th, 2007 @ 2:14am CDT
Posted by SeekerInAFakeMoustache on April 27th, 2007 @ 3:15am CDT
Screambug wrote:"fanboys?"
I know.
Posted by Kayevcee on April 27th, 2007 @ 4:18am CDT
I suspect the reviewer here hates Michael Bay (his movies, him personally, or both) and is transferring that to the page. He's being unrealistically pessimistic because, like Acecool and Sentinel Maximus in this very thread, he wants him to fail and be kicked out of the business. Since most people will be going to see TF because 'Hey! Giant robots that turn into cars!' rather than 'Hey! That director is a skilled storyteller and I admire his other work!' I don't think the film has much to worry about.
-Nick
Posted by Ultra Convoy on April 27th, 2007 @ 7:19am CDT
Posted by Blitzwing the warrior on April 27th, 2007 @ 7:27am CDT
Posted by Liege Evilmus on April 27th, 2007 @ 8:08am CDT
Posted by Predacon Rampage on April 27th, 2007 @ 8:10am CDT
Posted by Booda on April 27th, 2007 @ 9:12am CDT
Second of all, $235 million is the "safe bet." All the movies above it are sequels, with two or more successful movies preceeding them. They're not projecting sales just on whether or not people will LIKE the movies; they're projecting it based on the prequel sales. But I say it's like rolling a die. Just because you roll a six twice in a row doesn't affect the odds of you rolling a six the third time.
And if Transformers beats its $235 mill projection? Then all hell will break loose.
Posted by featofstrength on April 27th, 2007 @ 11:23am CDT
Posted by OptimusIsHot on April 27th, 2007 @ 11:33am CDT
Posted by Ultra Magnus on April 27th, 2007 @ 1:03pm CDT
Why does everyone hate Michael Bay so much? His movies Do Not suck, by any stretch of the imagination. On paper, and in practice, his movies give you everything you want or Could want from a blockbuster movie experience. I just don't get why people give this guy such a hard time. His movies have Action, Comedy, Romance, Politics, and to top it off, he's got his own style. You can tell it's a Michael Bay film when you see it. He doesn't make 'kiddie' movies. He makes movies with Huge explosions and Lude humor, plus, his casts always have charisma. Michael Bay's movies don't seem to have a lot of stupid dialogue either; take Armageddon for example. The whole movie is FULL of one-liners from just about everyone. Michael Bay has worked with some of the best and most well-respected actors on the screen and gotten A LOT of the qualities that make them so good out of them and into his movies. George Lucas certainly wasn't able to do that with the Prequel Trilogy- and I LOVE Star Wars!
All I'm saying is, this guy knows what he's doing. He get's the Actors to breathe life into their characters. Example: Steve Buscemi in Armageddon. Or, Ewan MacGregor in The Island. Through the characters they are portraying, you see what makes those particular actors so good. His Cinematography is excellent. Example: The scene in Pearl Harbor with the Japanese fleet flying over the baseball field(or is it a soccer field?). It gave me Goosebumps to see that many foreign air forces intruding on a kid's every day life; and he accomplished that with ONE camera move! His Editing Crews always get the pacing perfect; his movies never slow down. Maybe Pearl Harbor slowed down a bit, but that's because it was supposed to be more of a "Love Story" centered around the historic date.
My point is, I can not think of a better "Action Movie" director for Transformers. Who else is there?
Posted by Blitzwing the warrior on April 27th, 2007 @ 5:18pm CDT
Ultra Magnus wrote:*Sigh*
Why does everyone hate Michael Bay so much? His movies Do Not suck, by any stretch of the imagination. On paper, and in practice, his movies give you everything you want or Could want from a blockbuster movie experience. I just don't get why people give this guy such a hard time. His movies have Action, Comedy, Romance, Politics, and to top it off, he's got his own style. You can tell it's a Michael Bay film when you see it. He doesn't make 'kiddie' movies. He makes movies with Huge explosions and Lude humor, plus, his casts always have charisma. Michael Bay's movies don't seem to have a lot of stupid dialogue either; take Armageddon for example. The whole movie is FULL of one-liners from just about everyone. Michael Bay has worked with some of the best and most well-respected actors on the screen and gotten A LOT of the qualities that make them so good out of them and into his movies. George Lucas certainly wasn't able to do that with the Prequel Trilogy- and I LOVE Star Wars!
All I'm saying is, this guy knows what he's doing. He get's the Actors to breathe life into their characters. Example: Steve Buscemi in Armageddon. Or, Ewan MacGregor in The Island. Through the characters they are portraying, you see what makes those particular actors so good. His Cinematography is excellent. Example: The scene in Pearl Harbor with the Japanese fleet flying over the baseball field(or is it a soccer field?). It gave me Goosebumps to see that many foreign air forces intruding on a kid's every day life; and he accomplished that with ONE camera move! His Editing Crews always get the pacing perfect; his movies never slow down. Maybe Pearl Harbor slowed down a bit, but that's because it was supposed to be more of a "Love Story" centered around the historic date.
My point is, I can not think of a better "Action Movie" director for Transformers. Who else is there?
Great to see another Chicago guy around here, and I totally agree. When it comes to portrayl of the military to action sequences, Micheal Bay is the man. I also agree with your opinion on Pearl Harbor, the Zeros flying past the clothes lines and everybody looking at them was spectacular
Posted by Blitzwing the warrior on April 27th, 2007 @ 5:19pm CDT
Ultra Magnus wrote:*Sigh*
Why does everyone hate Michael Bay so much? His movies Do Not suck, by any stretch of the imagination. On paper, and in practice, his movies give you everything you want or Could want from a blockbuster movie experience. I just don't get why people give this guy such a hard time. His movies have Action, Comedy, Romance, Politics, and to top it off, he's got his own style. You can tell it's a Michael Bay film when you see it. He doesn't make 'kiddie' movies. He makes movies with Huge explosions and Lude humor, plus, his casts always have charisma. Michael Bay's movies don't seem to have a lot of stupid dialogue either; take Armageddon for example. The whole movie is FULL of one-liners from just about everyone. Michael Bay has worked with some of the best and most well-respected actors on the screen and gotten A LOT of the qualities that make them so good out of them and into his movies. George Lucas certainly wasn't able to do that with the Prequel Trilogy- and I LOVE Star Wars!
All I'm saying is, this guy knows what he's doing. He get's the Actors to breathe life into their characters. Example: Steve Buscemi in Armageddon. Or, Ewan MacGregor in The Island. Through the characters they are portraying, you see what makes those particular actors so good. His Cinematography is excellent. Example: The scene in Pearl Harbor with the Japanese fleet flying over the baseball field(or is it a soccer field?). It gave me Goosebumps to see that many foreign air forces intruding on a kid's every day life; and he accomplished that with ONE camera move! His Editing Crews always get the pacing perfect; his movies never slow down. Maybe Pearl Harbor slowed down a bit, but that's because it was supposed to be more of a "Love Story" centered around the historic date.
My point is, I can not think of a better "Action Movie" director for Transformers. Who else is there?
Great to see another Chicago guy around here, and I totally agree. When it comes to portrayl of the military to action sequences, Micheal Bay is the man. I also agree with your opinion on Pearl Harbor, the Zeros flying past the clothes lines and everybody looking at them was spectacular
Posted by Ericus Prime on April 27th, 2007 @ 6:38pm CDT
Posted by on April 30th, 2007 @ 3:13am CDT
How ironic.
Posted by Duo Prime on May 6th, 2007 @ 12:36am CDT
Posted by Roboto750 on May 6th, 2007 @ 12:41am CDT
Duo Prime wrote:As much as i hate most of the designs, and the mouth thing(uuugggghhhhh....), I want the movie to rip everything else to shreds just because its Transformers. Sort of a tie up between Spiderman 3 and Transformers, the other movies, I don't know anything about. I'm just so afraid they messed it up too much, and the rest of the world(if they show up to see it) is going to look at it and say(to us the fans), why do you like Transformers? That movie sucked.
Spider-Man 3 is doing a good job of making money, but it is disappointing more and more people along the way (based on the feedback and reviews I've heard, as well as my own thoughts after seeing it). It might just give TF somewhat of a slight advantage. At least in reviews, that is...
Posted by For Gondor! on May 6th, 2007 @ 12:44am CDT
Posted by Roboto750 on May 6th, 2007 @ 1:02am CDT
For Gondor! wrote:Doesn't Harry Potter come out a week or so after Transformers? It's getting good buzz (the trailer looks excellent) and at it's worst will make over 700m WW (third one made $789,804,554 worldwide and that was the lowest gross of the series). With the final book coming out and sending the hype even further, it could be the biggest film of the series and make a billion. That is something Transformers is not going to want to run into.
True, Harry Potter will be all hyped up at the time of it's release (and is even now), but it is still the 5th movie in the series. I can see more kids (and older readers) buying the new book before getting to go see the new movie in the theater. I'm sure it will make a bunch of money, but I think TF is still a pretty strong contender against it (that is if they would promote the darn TF movie like it should be!).