Rachel Taylor Article Online
Monday, May 28th, 2007 12:54PM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, Digital Media NewsPosted by: Raymond T. Views: 15,380
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
A short news article has appeared on the site of The Herald Sun that features Australian actress Rachel Taylor, who will play the part of Maggie in the upcoming Transformers Movie.
Rachel Taylor's agent, David Sheridan: "Like all young actresses, it's been a quantum leap in terms of understanding the business and Los Angeles and how it works, but she's working it all out".
Rachel Taylor's agent, David Sheridan: "Like all young actresses, it's been a quantum leap in terms of understanding the business and Los Angeles and how it works, but she's working it all out".
Credit(s): www.news.com.au/heraldsun
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
57,230 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
News Categories: Toy News, Movie Related News, Cartoon News, Comic Book News, Site News, Rumors, Event News, Digital Media News, Collectables, Sponsor News, Game News, Site Articles, Store News, Reviews, People News, Company News, Sightings, Press Releases, Unlicensed Products News, Auctions, Transtopia, Interviews, Editorials, Collector's Club News, Knock Offs, Podcast, Heavy Metal War, Contests, Book News, Top Lists
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139338)
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 1:03pm CDT
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 1:03pm CDT
Maggie the "code-cracking crime fighter," eh?
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139356)
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 1:17pm CDT
oi, Salazaar. Kinda off topic, no?
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 1:17pm CDT
Salazaar wrote:oi, raymond
oi, Salazaar. Kinda off topic, no?
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139368)
Posted by Darth Bombshell on May 28th, 2007 @ 1:29pm CDT
Posted by Darth Bombshell on May 28th, 2007 @ 1:29pm CDT
Indeed.
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139483)
Posted by Robinson on May 28th, 2007 @ 3:43pm CDT
We see the other thread, no need to spam it to other threads, Kinda kills it.
Posted by Robinson on May 28th, 2007 @ 3:43pm CDT
Salazaar wrote:oi, raymond
We see the other thread, no need to spam it to other threads, Kinda kills it.
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139545)
Posted by on May 28th, 2007 @ 5:05pm CDT
Posted by on May 28th, 2007 @ 5:05pm CDT
In my opinion SHE should have been the lead lady in the movie. She looks the part, is acting the part (code cracking computer genious) and it WAY hotter than Megan Fox. *Insert little heart smilies* I think I'm infactuated with her picture. :p
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139698)
Posted by i_amtrunks on May 28th, 2007 @ 6:53pm CDT
Posted by i_amtrunks on May 28th, 2007 @ 6:53pm CDT
She was one of the lucky Aussie actors who didnt have to spend years on either Home and Away or Neighbours before jetsetting off to LA. I only saw little bits of "Headland" and she was somewhat decent on it.
I think it will just be nice to hear the Aussie accent in amongst all the Americans (if she hasn't lost it already..)
I think it will just be nice to hear the Aussie accent in amongst all the Americans (if she hasn't lost it already..)
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139700)
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 6:53pm CDT
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 6:53pm CDT
I'd like to crack her code if you know what I mean.
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139738)
Posted by Raymond T. on May 28th, 2007 @ 7:17pm CDT
Posted by Raymond T. on May 28th, 2007 @ 7:17pm CDT
*groan*1337W422102 wrote:I'd like to crack her code if you know what I mean.
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139778)
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 7:46pm CDT
Lighten up, Ray, I'm just joking around.
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 7:46pm CDT
Raymond T. wrote:*groan*1337W422102 wrote:I'd like to crack her code if you know what I mean.
Lighten up, Ray, I'm just joking around.
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139808)
Posted by Raymond T. on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:03pm CDT
Posted by Raymond T. on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:03pm CDT
I know you were, or I wouldn't have groaned at you!1337W422102 wrote:Lighten up, Ray, I'm just joking around.Raymond T. wrote:*groan*1337W422102 wrote:I'd like to crack her code if you know what I mean.
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139846)
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:35pm CDT
It could have been worse; I could have posted this:
Posted by 1337W422102 on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:35pm CDT
Raymond T. wrote:I know you were, or I wouldn't have groaned at you!1337W422102 wrote:Lighten up, Ray, I'm just joking around.Raymond T. wrote:*groan*1337W422102 wrote:I'd like to crack her code if you know what I mean.
It could have been worse; I could have posted this:
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139859)
Posted by Roboto750 on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:44pm CDT
I agree 100% with this. A blonde feels more natural anyway (in the sense of a "Carly" type character).
Posted by Roboto750 on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:44pm CDT
Hot_Rod wrote:In my opinion SHE should have been the lead lady in the movie. She looks the part, is acting the part (code cracking computer genious) and it WAY hotter than Megan Fox. *Insert little heart smilies* I think I'm infactuated with her picture. :p
I agree 100% with this. A blonde feels more natural anyway (in the sense of a "Carly" type character).
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139864)
Posted by Raymond T. on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:50pm CDT
Posted by Raymond T. on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:50pm CDT
Well, Thank the Matrix that you didn't post that, then...1337W422102 wrote:Raymond T. wrote:I know you were, or I wouldn't have groaned at you!1337W422102 wrote:Lighten up, Ray, I'm just joking around.Raymond T. wrote:*groan*1337W422102 wrote:I'd like to crack her code if you know what I mean.
It could have been worse; I could have posted this:
Re: Rachel Taylor Article Online (139872)
Posted by Liege Evilmus on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:55pm CDT
Posted by Liege Evilmus on May 28th, 2007 @ 8:55pm CDT
Cool, we're getting not 1 but 2 movie chicks, this is getting better and better!
