Toy Fair 2016 List of New Transformers Robots In Disguise Reveals on Display #HasbroToyFair #TFNY
Sunday, February 14th, 2016 8:34am CST
Categories: Toy News, Event NewsPosted by: william-james88 Views: 47,280
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Here is a list of everything else that was revealed only through the display area:
One Step Changer Bisk


One Step Blizzard Strike Sideswipe

One-Step Changers/Advanced Optimus Prime


One-Step Changers/Advanced Strongarm

Legion Groundbuster

Legion Blizzard Strike Drift

Battle 2-pack Sideswipe with Minicon WindStrike
Battle 2-pack Strongarm with Minicon Sawtooth




Powersurge Heros Bumblebee with Minicon Buzzstrike
Powersurge Heros Sideswipe with Minicon Windstrike



Minicon 4 pack with Autobot Dragonus, Bash Breaker, Lord Doomitron, and Lancelon
3 step Energon Boost Bumblebee (with all-spark blue) and 3 step Drift (regular colours)

There is also a Warrior Grimlock rerelease which has a box with a new playability feature highlighted involving the weapon minicons.

And a slew of minicons, many of which can become weapons, such as Tricerashot, Lord Doomitron, Weapon Slipstream and Bashbreaker.



Credit(s): Toy Fair 2016
This article was last modified on Sunday, February 14th, 2016 8:35am CST
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
Most Recent Transformers News
Posted by OptimalOptimus2 on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:58am CST
Posted by william-james88 on February 14th, 2016 @ 9:26am CST
OptimalOptimus2 wrote:Robots In Disguise has traveled into Armada territory on steroids.
FKEN LOVE IT!
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 11:28am CST
Posted by Deadput on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:21pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:Why is Groundpounder's toy named "Groundbuster"?
I wonder why certainly would have nothing to do with copyright at all now would it?
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 2:23pm CST
Why would the show give him a name that Hasbro, the company that created and owns the character, can't Trademark?Deadput wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why is Groundpounder's toy named "Groundbuster"?
I wonder why certainly would have nothing to do with copyright at all now would it?
Posted by Deadput on February 14th, 2016 @ 3:39pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:Why would the show give him a name that Hasbro, the company that created and owns the character, can't Trademark?
Who knows?
I'm not a wizard I can't pretend to know what Hasbro is up to I'm just guessing.
Posted by Microraptor on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:03pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:Why would the show give him a name that Hasbro, the company that created and owns the character, can't Trademark?Deadput wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why is Groundpounder's toy named "Groundbuster"?
I wonder why certainly would have nothing to do with copyright at all now would it?
The show runners not knowing if the name was available for toys, hasbro not caring enough to notify them, no plans to make a toy at the time so nobody thought it would be a problem, take your pick.
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 6:58pm CST
Hasbro has a history of making sure that their cartoons have used names that they can use. For them to not do so would make them look bad.Microraptor wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why would the show give him a name that Hasbro, the company that created and owns the character, can't Trademark?Deadput wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why is Groundpounder's toy named "Groundbuster"?
I wonder why certainly would have nothing to do with copyright at all now would it?
The show runners not knowing if the name was available for toys, hasbro not caring enough to notify them, no plans to make a toy at the time so nobody thought it would be a problem, take your pick.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on February 14th, 2016 @ 8:59pm CST
Bisk, Scorponok, Groundpounder, Windblade are all buys. Yes.
I want minicons so much right now.

Posted by william-james88 on February 14th, 2016 @ 9:43pm CST
Sabrblade wrote:Hasbro has a history of making sure that their cartoons have used names that they can use. For them to not do so would make them look bad.Microraptor wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why would the show give him a name that Hasbro, the company that created and owns the character, can't Trademark?Deadput wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why is Groundpounder's toy named "Groundbuster"?
I wonder why certainly would have nothing to do with copyright at all now would it?
The show runners not knowing if the name was available for toys, hasbro not caring enough to notify them, no plans to make a toy at the time so nobody thought it would be a problem, take your pick.
Wait wait, so Hasbro saying we'd get an MP Sideswipe but not giving us one was fine, them never giving us the voyager Prime Breakdown (which they designed) is totally cool, and them green lighting all those Michael bay films is no problem, all the piss poor platinums being released this year are totally firgiveable, BUT it's this that makes them look bad, THIS!?!?!?!
Posted by Sabrblade on February 14th, 2016 @ 9:48pm CST
Please don't twist my words. You know good and well what I meant.william-james88 wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Hasbro has a history of making sure that their cartoons have used names that they can use. For them to not do so would make them look bad.Microraptor wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why would the show give him a name that Hasbro, the company that created and owns the character, can't Trademark?Deadput wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Why is Groundpounder's toy named "Groundbuster"?
I wonder why certainly would have nothing to do with copyright at all now would it?
The show runners not knowing if the name was available for toys, hasbro not caring enough to notify them, no plans to make a toy at the time so nobody thought it would be a problem, take your pick.
Wait wait, so Hasbro saying we'd get an MP Sideswipe but not giving us one was fine, them never giving us the voyager Prime Breakdown (which they designed) is totally cool, and them green lighting all those Michael bay films is no problem, all the piss poor platinums being released this year are totally firgiveable, BUT it's this that makes them look bad, THIS!?!?!?!
Posted by Deadput on February 14th, 2016 @ 10:02pm CST
Were kinda sending this thread out of control.
Posted by Lunatic Prime on February 15th, 2016 @ 3:47am CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:OK, So I love that new prime. I want it. and the warrior version seems to have tried to solve the enclosed fist issue by putting that blockage on the shoulders.
Bisk, Scorponok, Groundpounder, Windblade are all buys. Yes.
I want minicons so much right now.
The Blizzard Strike OP already has fixed fists and they didn't put something on his shoulders.
I'm definitely waiting for the Warrior version of Bisk and the new weapon Mini-Cons are really cool. I want that black version of Lord Doomitron so bad.

Posted by william-james88 on February 15th, 2016 @ 6:38am CST
Sabrblade wrote:Please don't twist my words. You know good and well what I meant.
No, I did not. If your main argument is that Hasbro is afraid of looking bad then I feel that isnt much of an argument seeing as how they havent been afraid in the past. Disney made a legal mistake for the avengers blu ray boxset, Hasbro's legal department is not impervious to mistakes either.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on February 15th, 2016 @ 9:08am CST
Lunatic Prime wrote:The Blizzard Strike OP already has fixed fists and they didn't put something on his shoulders.
When was this mentioned? I hadn't heard that

Posted by Lunatic Prime on February 15th, 2016 @ 9:30am CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Lunatic Prime wrote:The Blizzard Strike OP already has fixed fists and they didn't put something on his shoulders.
When was this mentioned? I hadn't heard that
Good question. I think it was in the YouTube video from the show floor posted here.
Edit: No, forget that. I muddled something from a review.
Posted by PeterPrime on February 15th, 2016 @ 1:16pm CST

Posted by Hellscream9999 on February 15th, 2016 @ 3:43pm CST
PeterPrime wrote:I read on the Hasbro press release for Toy Fair that the 6 mini-con battlepacks we've seen are all they are going to release.No Steeljaw in almost cyberverse commander size.
Welcome to the boards

So, what's your story, you into RID?
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on February 15th, 2016 @ 4:01pm CST
Lunatic Prime wrote:D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Lunatic Prime wrote:The Blizzard Strike OP already has fixed fists and they didn't put something on his shoulders.
When was this mentioned? I hadn't heard that
Good question. I think it was in the YouTube video from the show floor posted here.
Edit: No, forget that. I muddled something from a review.
Well look at that. I may need to find another warrior with the fix now. Maybe that Power Surge one, but that larger one looks cooler...

Posted by william-james88 on February 15th, 2016 @ 4:07pm CST
D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Well look at that. I may need to find another warrior with the fix now. Maybe that Power Surge one, but that larger one looks cooler...
I must be slow, what is dfferent when it comes to his wrists compared to the previous one?

Transformers: Robots In Disguise (2015) Blizzard Strike Optimus Prime Gallery