Transformers Movie Criticized For Martketing Towards Kids Too Young
Wednesday, January 9th, 2008 5:38PM CST
Categories: Movie Related News, Digital Media NewsPosted by: Raymond T. Views: 34,649
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
According to the star, the Federal Trade Commission is urging the Motion Picture Association of America to reconsider their guidelines that allow some PG-13 movies in the United States to be marketed towards young children. The issue was taken notice by the FTC after a complaint from an advocacy group that claimed that the movie was advertised towards childeren as young as two years of age. This conclusion was drawn after commercials for the movie was aired during kids shows like Fairly Odd Parents and Jimmy Neutron.
Read the full article here.
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
57,247 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by i_amtrunks on January 9th, 2008 @ 5:40pm CST
Advocacy groups seem to hold a lot of sway. Crazy people always do.
Posted by zemper on January 9th, 2008 @ 5:45pm CST
but well, business is business...
Posted by xxaMaxx on January 9th, 2008 @ 5:55pm CST
I also remember being a kid and I knowing a movie probably wasn't any good unless it was rated PG-13 or higher.
Posted by Raymond T. on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:05pm CST
Posted by what0080 on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:11pm CST
[/Sarcasm]
Posted by Autobot Jazz on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:17pm CST
Posted by imotron on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:35pm CST
Posted by Liege Evilmus on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:42pm CST
Posted by Starscreams bad comedy on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:48pm CST
2. Just because they advertised during shows that may have 2 year olds watching doesn’t means that said two year olds are going to even want to see Transformers.
3. If said two year olds want to see it then its their parents decision if they will take them to see it or if its inappropriate for them, not some advocacy group.
Posted by Abilor on January 9th, 2008 @ 6:53pm CST
PRIORITIES GODDAMNIT!!!!
Posted by Lapse Of Reason on January 9th, 2008 @ 7:46pm CST
It seems the toys were designed for an older age group too, seeing how fragile some of them are.
Posted by ***Galvatron*** on January 9th, 2008 @ 7:51pm CST
Abilor wrote:It's REALLY hard to take this seriously while Ronald McDonald is selling toddlers heart disease and diabetes...
PRIORITIES GODDAMNIT!!!!
That's McHeart Disease and McDiabetes !
Yeah priorities!
Transformers the movie was geared towards 2 year olds ? this is actually an old story dating back at least 5 months now but what two year old understands all of what they would be seeing in that movie anyway ?
I saw the movie five times in the theater and not anyone under the age of 15 was ever present that I noticed.
This is BS and it's the parents job to do exactly that, PARENT your kids and stop blaming everything on tv,music,movies and so on.
Just because an ad appears on a childrens show doesn't mean only two or three year olds are watching especially a show like transformers where even the current animated version is geared towards a younger audience and a lot of the people here have watched it and gee I'm guessing most people here are not two years old!
Parents, do your bloody jobs and quit making excuses, the tv set is not an instant baby sitter for your kids!
Posted by Omega Charge on January 9th, 2008 @ 8:29pm CST
Posted by Wheelimus Prime on January 9th, 2008 @ 8:52pm CST
Posted by imotron on January 9th, 2008 @ 9:44pm CST
Posted by Nemesis_Apoc on January 9th, 2008 @ 9:55pm CST
Posted by Cascadia on January 9th, 2008 @ 10:43pm CST
Posted by Nemesis Cyberplex on January 9th, 2008 @ 10:51pm CST
Except Hasbro's products won't leave kids with a plastic ring in their throats.....er.....wait a minute......Nemesis_Apoc wrote:Hasbro is no different than Marlboro. Gotta hook'em when they're young.
Honestly, Just because they are tied into a movie, you can't forget what they are: toys....children's toys at that. So Bumblebee in the movie peed on a guy....dosen't mean any of the BB toys have a squirt gun feature lodged into the crotch.
My 3-year-old son has several of the kiddy-marketed TF toys, & I have no problem with that. Without the movie's adult content to back them up, they're nothing but hunks of plastic.
& IIRC, that's the whole reasoning for why Hasbro ever marketed them towards kiddies in the first place: so that younger kids wouldn't have to miss out on the Transformers movie characters just because the movie was out of their age range......not to cause them to want to watch the movie so much as fill the void for the ones that couldn't watch it. it's kinda a nice gesture. Besides, you don't see people getting pissy about the Spider-man & Friends toys & merchandise, even though the Spider-man movies are PG-13.
Posted by Autobot032 on January 10th, 2008 @ 12:09am CST
The rest of it? I completely agree.
It was a movie aimed at teens and adults (i.e. collectors, old school fans) and it definitely wasn't kid material.
1.) Violent. (Excessive considering the source material.)
2.) Foul language. (More than had ever been in US TF material.)
3.) Sexual situations. (Absolutely unnecessary for the film.)
It was a great movie, no doubt, but it certainly wasn't kid friendly. If I was a parent and hadn't seen the film beforehand, I too would be ballistically infuriated by the content. It's based on a kid's toyline and show, and there are plenty of tie-in toys that kids would want.
As much as I hate to admit it (beyond the age 2 thing...) this argument is sound.
This is why I like TransFormers: Animated, it really *does* encompass all audiences and entertains without selling out or compromising quality.
Posted by Ultra Markus on January 10th, 2008 @ 1:38am CST
it shouldn't matter parents will take them to a
movie like that if they choose
Posted by Autobot032 on January 10th, 2008 @ 1:56am CST
Ultra Markus wrote:so what, then how young is too young,
it shouldn't matter parents will take them to a
movie like that if they choose
Alright, fair enough. However, there are plenty of parents out there who wouldn't take their child to see it. They know to avoid the potential problems that will arise from a viewing.
It's those smart parents that this complaint is for. The sensible ones.
Posted by The Chopnel on January 10th, 2008 @ 2:01am CST
Would you think the same way if you were NOT a Transformers fan? I mean, while I think these things sometimes sounds ridiculous to me, it is also good to rememer that we human beings use to defend the things/TV shows/movies/etc. we personally like, even if it's irrational.
So we, as TF fans, probably aren't the most unbiased people to comment on that complaint. But if there really has been aggressive marketing towards little kids, it does sound kinda weird.
Posted by WhiteRabbit on January 10th, 2008 @ 4:08am CST
If these people want to form groups to yell about movie content to either call out the film's producers or warn their like-minded ilk, fine. As long as they're not kidding themselves that most of the things they find offensive can be found in everything from nursery rhymes to the evening news to the bible. It all depends on how you look at it.
Most of the suggestive stuff in there would've flown right over their heads, not unlike the morbidity of many a nursery rhyme. "Rock-a-bye baby" has a baby falling out of a tree!
Personally, I think if they'd like to defend their children from the media-saturated world, a good start is as simple as communication. Kids are people too, and people always respond better to respect.
There's no need to dumb things down. Trust your instinct as a parent and respect your child as a person. Transformers was PG-13, and was at one point rated R. The movie was intended for an older audience, and a simple amount of research would reveal that to any parent. The rest is their responsibility, not Hollywood's, or the target audience of the film (the people who inevitably pay the price for these little "outrages").
In any case, in the Transformers movie that came out when I was a kid, Spike said "shit", and Optimus Prime died!. Also, a Junkion kissed a Dinobot.
The worst effect all that had on me was over two decades of throwing money at the franchise in question.
Posted by Black Bumblebee on January 10th, 2008 @ 8:44am CST
This should have been quite apparent to anyone with half a brain.
Clues to fill you in that it is not a kid's movie:
1) It is rated PG-13. Duh. Got a 2 year old? Don't take it to a movie that needs Parental Guidance for children under 13!
2) It was directed by Michael Bay. Has he ever directed episodes of Barney? No. He directs movies in which things blow up and people curse a lot while women look like eye candy.
3) It had no little kids in the cast.
4) Most every commercial for Transformers made a point of trying to show the realism of the situation and set up a scary vibe OR focus on showing the female star's stomach. Hmmm... for kids? No.
While I am in agreement that the movie did not need to be advertised during cartoons aimed at extremely young children, I am sick of groups trying to censor material that parents should easily be able to censor themselves. These are the same groups that will complain about the content in Grand Theft Auto even though the label states explicity on the cover that it is not for little children.
Put the responsibility back where it deserves to be. On the parent.
Posted by woosh on January 10th, 2008 @ 9:33am CST
I wonder why the kids aren't scared of venom.
Or are they?
And yes. Transformers wasn't a kids movie, just like any of the "resurrected francise" movies.
Posted by Prankmeister on January 10th, 2008 @ 9:45am CST
Posted by Sunstar on January 10th, 2008 @ 9:56am CST
Since I don't have a TV, I can't tell where these commercials are coming up, or were coming up. In that, I'll take your word for it.
But with the toys. I have raised a brow a few times and I am in agreement with these figures are far too difficult for a child of 5 to transform.
The Masterpiece Starscream, for instance, says for ages 5+. I don't feel that figure should be in the hands of anyone younger than 10 at the very least. It's a rather tough figure to transform, even for me and I am 32. Just move the figure the wrong way and it will break and children are not known for being gentle with toys.
As for hasbro. It's all a business opportunity. I sound like Quark, been watching DS9 lately.
Marketing is Marketing. And In the end, it is up to the parent to decide what is right for their child and what is not. It's not up to everyone else to make that decision.
Posted by Duo Prime on January 10th, 2008 @ 10:59am CST
And even besides all of that, all of my friends and family let their kids watch Transformers, and they are just fine. What is it exactly that these baffoons are trying to shield their kids from, and is it really that bad? Really..
Posted by Ultra Markus on January 10th, 2008 @ 1:11pm CST
Autobot032 wrote:Ultra Markus wrote:so what, then how young is too young,
it shouldn't matter parents will take them to a
movie like that if they choose
Alright, fair enough. However, there are plenty of parents out there who wouldn't take their child to see it. They know to avoid the potential problems that will arise from a viewing.
It's those smart parents that this complaint is for. The sensible ones.
so your calling those parents who sit and watch these shows with their kids and teach them the difference between fact and fiction stupid for allowing them to see it.
You know if it was a rated R i could see your point but don't call parents stupid for letting their kids watch a pg-13 movie thats just ignorant .
Posted by Chaoslock on January 10th, 2008 @ 1:29pm CST
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:So Bumblebee in the movie peed on a guy....dosen't mean any of the BB toys have a squirt gun feature lodged into the crotch.
I knew something was missing from Premium Quality Bumblebee!
Posted by Autobot032 on January 10th, 2008 @ 3:01pm CST
Ultra Markus wrote:Autobot032 wrote:Ultra Markus wrote:so what, then how young is too young,
it shouldn't matter parents will take them to a
movie like that if they choose
Alright, fair enough. However, there are plenty of parents out there who wouldn't take their child to see it. They know to avoid the potential problems that will arise from a viewing.
It's those smart parents that this complaint is for. The sensible ones.
so your calling those parents who sit and watch these shows with their kids and teach them the difference between fact and fiction stupid for allowing them to see it.
You know if it was a rated R i could see your point but don't call parents stupid for letting their kids watch a pg-13 movie thats just ignorant .
But it *IS* stupid. Not to mention, most of the parents today don't actually sit down and explain the difference for their children. Nor do they talk to them. If that wasn't the case, we wouldn't have ads about "Make a family night!" or "Dinnertime: The time for family!" etc...etc...
No. It's easier to shove a kid in front of a TV and let it be the babysitter.
PG-13: "PARENTS STRONGLY CAUTIONED — Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13" (this is the current MPAA description for PG-13) Not to mention, the ads clearly say "INTENSE SEQUENCES OF SCI-FI ACTION VIOLENCE, BRIEF SEXUAL HUMOR AND LANGUAGE" (all in caps, I might mention) and this is the actual rating icon taken from the movie's official site: http://www.transformersmovie.com/images/rating.gif
Any parent who takes their child (under the age of 13) to the film is just asking for trouble. It's their own stupidity if the kid sees it and has a problem because it's their job to make sure their children don't see if it doesn't fit them.
This is why the complaint is being made...too many idiot parents need a wake up call. Not to mention the film is marketed towards a youth audience. One commercial shows Bumblebee (who is adorable, there's no doubt that was intentional) and Sam (who's clearly a kid, a teenager yes, but a kid, and youngsters will identify with him) and it said "THEY'RE TEAMING UP TO SAVE THE WORLD!" ....what kid wouldn't buy into that? The kid's the superhero! The parents would buy into it too! Heck, even I was sucked into it.
The film is marketed towards too young of an audience and parents should pay attention to the ratings. They don't, which leads to complaints like this. I could repeat it 'til I'm blue in the face.
Posted by Nemesis Cyberplex on January 10th, 2008 @ 3:49pm CST
I took my kids to see it, & have had no problems with them. They didn't get scared, they haven't started asking about masturbating, haven't started running around the house swearing....nothing. I do find it offensive, though, that you do a large lump grouping of people & call them stupid. I was well aware of what the movie consisted of before I took my kids to see it. I saw a few things that weren't suitable, but overlooked it because I figured they would too, & they did.Any parent who takes their child (under the age of 13) to the film is just asking for trouble.
The standard deluxe/voyager/leader class figures are, yes, but there are also the fast action battlers, real gear, cyber stompin ,& cyber slammers, among others, that younger kiddies can easily play with & have fun.But with the toys. I have raised a brow a few times and I am in agreement with these figures are far too difficult for a child of 5 to transform.
Posted by Autobot032 on January 10th, 2008 @ 6:07pm CST
Nemesis Cyberplex wrote:I took my kids to see it, & have had no problems with them. They didn't get scared, they haven't started asking about masturbating, haven't started running around the house swearing....nothing. I do find it offensive, though, that you do a large lump grouping of people & call them stupid. I was well aware of what the movie consisted of before I took my kids to see it. I saw a few things that weren't suitable, but overlooked it because I figured they would too, & they did.Any parent who takes their child (under the age of 13) to the film is just asking for trouble.The standard deluxe/voyager/leader class figures are, yes, but there are also the fast action battlers, real gear, cyber stompin ,& cyber slammers, among others, that younger kiddies can easily play with & have fun.But with the toys. I have raised a brow a few times and I am in agreement with these figures are far too difficult for a child of 5 to transform.
Each parent/child relationship is different. Whereas your children might be able to handle such a film (which is the case, obviously) there are many others that can't and the parents still don't care. I've seen plenty more irresponsible parents than I have responsible ones. Granted, that's my personal experience and I can't speak for everyone in what they've seen, but that's how it's been for me. Believe me, I'd have rather seen better examples of parenting. The only example I had that was any good, were my own parents. They sheltered me some, sure, but they did it out of a good, kind hearted mentality.
Some children are obviously capable of handling films that aren't aimed at them (I still can't stomach Alien(s), but I've known families who'd sit around and watch Ripley blow crap up.) and other children can't...yet their parents don't give a crap and let them see terrible stuff and can't figure out why the kid ain't doin' well with that material. It's those kids, those families that something like this is for.
Posted by Sentry Prime on January 10th, 2008 @ 6:42pm CST
on a related note, does it make me a bad father, if my 2 yr old cas quote Megatron:
"No Pyme, it juss me!"
"Oh, so sunwise!"
*collective AWWwwww*
Posted by Abilor on January 10th, 2008 @ 9:13pm CST
Sentry Prime wrote:"No Pyme, it juss me!"
"Oh, so sunwise!"
Awesome. That would make a hell of a youtube with her voice cut over the movie scenes...
Posted by imotron on January 11th, 2008 @ 9:50am CST
Posted by rhinox555 on January 11th, 2008 @ 10:55am CST
Posted by ***Galvatron*** on January 15th, 2008 @ 10:03pm CST
rhinox555 wrote:And nobody protests against dutch toy stores selling porn.
LOL yeah but are they "adult toys" then if there's porn being sold in them ? ah ha ha ha ha!