Sabrblade wrote:I really don't get why they even made this (BESIDES "more toys = more $$$").
What, uppercase wasn't enough? Do I have to put the word in bold, italics, and underline it too?RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I really don't get why they even made this (BESIDES "more toys = more $$$").
Well, there you go.
Sabrblade wrote:What, uppercase wasn't enough? Do I have to put the word in bold, italics, and underline it too?RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I really don't get why they even made this (BESIDES "more toys = more $$$").
Well, there you go.
And how are they supposed to make decent money off of something they don't advertise to its target audience or sell via an outlet its target audience is known to shop from? This thing has no promotion or recognition outside of the adult collector market.RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:What, uppercase wasn't enough? Do I have to put the word in bold, italics, and underline it too?RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I really don't get why they even made this (BESIDES "more toys = more $$$").
Well, there you go.
Because?
There's just no better reason.
Sabrblade wrote:And how are they supposed to make decent money off of something they don't advertise to its target audience or sell via an outlet its target audience is known to shop from? This thing has no promotion or recognition outside of the adult collector market.RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:What, uppercase wasn't enough? Do I have to put the word in bold, italics, and underline it too?RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I really don't get why they even made this (BESIDES "more toys = more $$$").
Well, there you go.
Because?
There's just no better reason.
Sabrblade wrote:And how are they supposed to make decent money off of something they don't advertise to its target audience or sell via an outlet its target audience is known to shop from? This thing has no promotion or recognition outside of the adult collector market.RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:What, uppercase wasn't enough? Do I have to put the word in bold, italics, and underline it too?RhA wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I really don't get why they even made this (BESIDES "more toys = more $$$").
Well, there you go.
Because?
There's just no better reason.
Sabrblade wrote:It's just so bizarre and random.
Sabrblade wrote:So it is Blurr after all and not a new character?
'Kay. Just checking since I remember some (but not all) reports from Toy Fair that claimed the blue Blurr was named "Mirage", but never saw any official confirmation about that.D-Maximus_Primal wrote:Sabrblade wrote:So it is Blurr after all and not a new character?
Seems like it
Sabrblade wrote:'Kay. Just checking since I remember some (but not all) reports from Toy Fair that claimed the blue Blurr was named "Mirage", but never saw any official confirmation about that.D-Maximus_Primal wrote:Sabrblade wrote:So it is Blurr after all and not a new character?
Seems like it
Probably some unawares at the event who saw the blue F-1 racer TF and leaped to their own conclusions.D-Maximus_Primal wrote:Sabrblade wrote:'Kay. Just checking since I remember some (but not all) reports from Toy Fair that claimed the blue Blurr was named "Mirage", but never saw any official confirmation about that.D-Maximus_Primal wrote:Sabrblade wrote:So it is Blurr after all and not a new character?
Seems like it
I'm going with what Seibertron himself told me to put in, so it would seem that there is no Mirage here. Wonder where that came from?
